Combatting Fusarium head blight: advances in molecular interactions between Fusarium graminearum and wheat
Phytopathology Research volume 4, Article number: 37 (2022)
Fusarium head blight (FHB), mainly caused by Fusarium graminearum, is one of the most devastating diseases in wheat and barley worldwide. In addition to causing severe yield losses, F. graminearum produces deoxynivalenol (DON), a trichothecene mycotoxin which is harmful to human health and serves as an important virulence factor. Currently, changes in global climate and tillage systems have made FHB epidemics more frequent and severe. During the past decade, considerable efforts have been deployed to reveal the pathogenic mechanisms of F. graminearum, identify resistance genes in wheat, and breed FHB-resistant varieties. In this review, we highlight recent advances in FHB pathogenesis, F. graminearum-wheat interaction, and wheat defense mechanisms. This review contains four main sections: (1) signal sensing and transduction associated with the pathogenesis of F. graminearum; (2) regulation and functions of DON during wheat infection; (3) roles of F. graminearum-secreted enzymes and effectors in facilitating pathogen infection of wheat; (4) wheat components involved in interactions with F. graminearum. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular interactions between F. graminearum and wheat will contribute to the development of novel and efficient strategies for controlling FHB.
Wheat, one of the most important and highly nutritional cereals in the world, is used in the production of a diverse range of foods (Appels et al. 2018). It is a staple crop in Asia, Europe, North America, Australasia, as well as in other countries and regions (Hazard et al. 2020). Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused by Fusarium graminearum, is a notorious fungal disease affecting wheat and barley production worldwide (Walter et al. 2010; Jiang et al. 2020a). As global warming advances and the tillage system changes, the frequency and magnitude of FHB epidemics have significantly increased in recent years (Chen et al. 2019; Zhu et al. 2019). In addition to causing severe yield losses and reducing grain quality, F. graminearum produces trichothecene mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) and other toxic secondary metabolites (Ma et al. 2020). Due to the devastating nature of FHB, F. graminearum is ranked in the top 10 fungal pathogens in plant pathology (Dean et al. 2012).
FHB epidemics cause severe economic losses and pose a serious threat to human and animal health worldwide (Gorash et al. 2021). Since 1950, at least thirty FHB epidemics have been reported in China, occurring almost yearly during the past 20 years (Ma et al. 2020). FHB affects an average of over 4.5 million hectares, approximately 20% of which are planted with wheat, resulting in yield losses of over 3.41 million tons between 2000 and 2018 (Chen et al. 2019). FHB was also considered the most destructive wheat disease in the USA (Wood et al. 1999) and caused a total loss of 17 billion U.S. dollars between 1993 and 2014 (Wood et al. 1999; Wilson et al. 2017). FHB epidemics were also reported in other wheat-growing countries, such as Canada, Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, Hungary, and Poland (Dweba et al. 2017; Ma et al. 2020).
Although multidisciplinary efforts from phytopathologists, agronomists, breeders, commercial companies, and government research agencies have been conducted to control FHB, novel strategies for management of FHB still must be developed to face the continuous threat of the disease (Dweba et al. 2017). Here, we review the pathogenesis of F. graminearum, and the defense of wheat against infection by F. graminearum, providing new insights into the development of FHB control strategies and guiding wheat breeding programs to achieve resistance to FHB.
Signal sensing and transduction associated with the pathogenicity of F. graminearum
Infection and colonization of host plants by F. graminearum
As the main primary inoculum of FHB, F. graminearum ascospores are released from perithecia that are generated in infected residues of preceding crops or other non-crop plants (Dill-Macky and Jones 2000; Trail 2009). The ascospores adhere to the host surface and germinate to produce germ tubes. Hydrophobin proteins FgHyd2, FgHyd3, and FgHyd4 contribute to the attachment of ascospores to hydrophobic surfaces such as wheat spike tissues (Quarantin et al. 2019a). Attached germ tubes then develop into specialized unbranched hyphae known as runner hyphae (RH). The RH grows epiphytically on the surface of the wheat spike and differentiates to generate multicellular infection cushions (IC) (Boenisch and Schäfer 2011). The IC penetrate plant cuticles and form multiple penetration sites to facilitate the initiation of infection (Mentges et al. 2020). In addition, small infection structures, such as lobate appressoria and foot structures, found on the wheat palea, may also be involved in the early stage of infection (Mentges et al. 2020). To investigate the molecular basis of infection structure formation, laser capture microdissection was used to isolate RH and IC (Mentges et al. 2020). RNA-seq and transcriptome analysis showed that a variety of infection-related genes such as carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), candidate effectors, and secondary metabolism gene clusters are upregulated in the IC relative to those in the RH (Mentges et al. 2020). During F. graminearum infection, IC act as both infection structures and arsenal. Upon infection, infection hyphae spread throughout the spikelet and the rachial node, and eventually grow through the rachis to reach the spikelets above and below the node (Dweba et al. 2017).
G-protein-coupled receptor and G-protein signaling pathways
Fungal signaling pathways are important for initial colonization and subsequent switches among different stages of plant infection (Fig. 1). Fungi utilize G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to sense environmental cues and in turn activate downstream signaling for the regulation of various biological processes (Brown et al. 2018). During infection of plants, fungal pathogens direct hyphal growth toward host-derived signals such as nutrients, wax, and hydrophobic surfaces (Turrà et al. 2015; Brown et al. 2018; Sridhar et al. 2020). A systematic characterization of 105 GPCR genes in F. graminearum demonstrated that five of them (GIV1–GIV5) are up-regulated during infection of plant and play crucial roles in the virulence of the pathogen (Jiang et al. 2018). Giv1 likely senses factors in wheat floral tissue for the regulation of IC formation through Gα Gpa2 and the cAMP-PKA pathways (Yu et al. 2008; Hu et al. 2014; Jiang et al. 2018). Giv1 also functions upstream of the Gpmk1 MAPK (PMK1) pathway which is also required for plant infection (Jenczmionka et al. 2003; Jiang et al. 2018, 2019). Although Giv2 and Giv3 have no effect on the initial infection of lemma tissues, they are involved in penetrating the rachis and spreading in the wheat spike (Jiang et al. 2018). Interestingly, F. graminearum has an expanded infection-related GPCR (EIG) gene subfamily including GIV2–GIV6. Comparative genomic analysis between Magnaporthe oryzae and Neurospora crassa suggests that GPCR genes in the EIG subfamily have expanded in phytopathogenic fungi, especially in F. graminearum. A total of 19 of the 22 EIG genes are in the fast-evolving genomic regions (Wang et al. 2017; Jiang et al. 2019), further indicating that this subfamily may be subjected to positive selection during the co-evolution of F. graminearum and wheat (Jiang et al. 2019). Another research group also showed that the expanded class X GPCRs (FGRRES_07792, accession number in the comprehensive reference annotation YL1 for PH-1: FG4G20870 and FGRRES_16221, accession number in the comprehensive reference annotation YL1 for PH-1: FG2G28420) interact with Gα subunits and are important for the virulence of F. graminearum (Dilks et al. 2019). FGRRES_16221 contributes to virulence by orchestrating the expression of some components in the fungal signaling pathway, such as GPCRs, G-proteins, cAMP-PKA, and MAPK, secondary metabolite genes, and putative secreted effector genes (Dilks et al. 2019). In addition, the pheromone receptor Ste2 in F. graminearum mediated the peroxidase-directed chemotropism that is associated with stimulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascade important for fungal cell wall integrity (Sridhar et al. 2020).
GPCRs are associated with intracellular heterotrimeric G proteins (Gα, Gβ, and Gγ) to regulate signal transduction. Once ligands are recognized by putative GPCRs, the heterotrimeric G-proteins will be dissociated into a GTP-binding Gα monomer and a Gβ/Gγ dimer, which in turn activates or inactivates the downstream signals by regulating downstream targets, such as phospholipases or adenylate cyclases (Brown et al. 2018; El-Defrawy and Hesham 2020). The genome of F. graminearum contains five heterotrimeric G protein genes, including three Gα subunits (GzGpa1, GzGpa2, and GzGpa3), one Gβ subunit GzGpb1, and one Gγ subunit GzGpg1. Deletion of GzGPA2 or GzGPB1, but not GzGPA1 or GzGPA3 reduces the pathogenicity of F. graminearum (Yu et al. 2008). Repressors of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins function primarily as GTPase-accelerating proteins to promote the hydrolysis rate of GTP bound to Gα, and then inactivate Gα and promote the formation of heterotrimeric G proteins, thus acting as negative regulators of G protein signaling (Xue et al. 2008). Three RGS proteins, FgFlbA, FgRgsA, and FgRgsB, were shown to be associated with the virulence of F. graminearum (Park et al. 2012).
MAPK and cAMP–PKA pathways
MAPK pathways play important roles in the responses to abiotic and biotic stresses in eukaryotic organisms. Typically, the MAPK pathway includes a kinase cascade, which comprises a MEK kinase (MEKK), a MAPK kinase (MEK), and a MAPK. The sequential activation of these kinases phosphorylates downstream transcription factors and other target proteins for the regulation of gene transcription associated with various biological processes (Zhang et al. 2021). Like most ascomycetous plant pathogenic fungi, F. graminearum has three MAPKs (Gpmk1/Map1, Mgv1, and FgHog1) that are orthologous to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fus3/Kss1, Slt2, and Hog1, respectively (Wang et al. 2011).
F. graminearum Gpmk1 (Map1) is orthologous to Fus3/Kss1, which is a component of the invasive growth (IG) MAPK pathway. Deletion of GPMK1 (MAP1) results in loss of pathogenicity and a reduction in DON production at the initial inoculation site (Urban et al. 2003). In addition, Gpmk1 mediates the regulation of the early production of extracellular enzymes such as endoglucanases, xylanases, proteases, and lipases (Jenczmionka and Schäfer 2005). The FgSte11-FgSte7-Gpmk1 kinase cascade is responsible for signal transduction in the F. graminearum Gpmk1 (Map1) pathway. Deletion of the upstream FgSTE11 (MEKK-coding gene) or FgSTE7 (MEK-coding gene), results in similar phenotypic defects to those observed in gpmk1 mutant during infection of wheat (Wang et al. 2011). A scaffold protein FgSte50 interacts with both FgSte11 and FgSte7, and the Fgste50 deletion mutant is non-pathogenic towards the wheat head as well (Gu et al. 2015a). FgSte50, FgSte11, and FgSte7 are essential for the phosphorylation of Gpmk1 and activation of the IG MAPK pathway in F. graminearum (Ramamoorthy et al. 2007; Gu et al. 2015a). Transcription factors FgSte12 and FgMcm1 were identified as the downstream targets of Gpmk1 (Gu et al. 2015b; Yang et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2021). Whereas FgSte12 is required for the secretion of cellulase and protease that are important for infection (Gu et al. 2015b), FgMcm1 is involved in the initial colonization and subsequent spread of F. graminearum throughout the wheat heads by regulating the expression of pathogenicity factors (Yang et al. 2015).
F. graminearum Mgv1, an ortholog of S. cerevisiae Slt2, is the MAPK of the cell wall integrity (CWI) MAPK pathway. Deletion of MGV1 or its upstream FgMKK1 or FgBCK1 in this pathway results in hypersensitivity to cell wall stresses and severe defects in pathogenicity (Wang et al. 2011; Zheng et al. 2012). The transcription factors FgRlm1, FgSwi6, and Fgp1, are potential downstream targets of CWI MAPK signaling (Jonkers et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2013; Yun et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2021). The Fgrlm1 deletion mutant is hypersensitive to cell wall-damaging agents and defective in pathogenicity (Yun et al. 2014). In contrast, FgSwi6 is required for cellulose utilization, DON production, and virulence of F. graminearum (Liu et al. 2013). The Wor1-like protein Fgp1 is required for DON production and pathogenicity (Jonkers et al. 2012). Although the relationship between Mgv1 and Fgp1 remains to be investigated, MoGti1 (the ortholog of Fgp1) in M. oryzae is indirectly regulated by Mps1 (the ortholog of Mgv1) (Li et al. 2016).
F. graminearum Hog1 is the MAPK that functions in the high-osmolarity glycerol (HOG) MAPK pathway. The HOG pathway is associated with the two-component system consisting of an osmosensor histidine kinase FgSln1, a histidine phosphotransfer protein FgHpt-1, and two response regulator proteins FgRrg-1 and FgRrg-2 (Jiang et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2021). Deletion of FgRRG-1 largely abolished the virulence of F. graminearum on wheat heads (Jiang et al. 2011). FgSsk2 and FgPbs2 act as the MEKK and MEK in the HOG MAPK cascade, respectively. Deletion of three main components in this kinase cascade increases the sensitivity of F. graminearum to osmotic and oxidative stresses, which are likely related to defects in virulence (Wang et al. 2011; Zheng et al. 2012). ATF/CREB transcription factor FgAtf1 is a well-studied downstream target of FgHog1. Osmotic stress promotes the interaction between FgAtf1 and FgHog1 (FgOS-2) in the nucleus, and the Fgatf1 deletion mutant is defective in wheat infection (van Nguyen et al. 2013).
Unlike its yeast ortholog, the osmosensor FgSho1 only plays a minor role in the response to osmotic stress in F. graminearum (Posas et al. 1996; Gu et al. 2015a, b). Instead, FgSho1 has an additive effect with FgSln1 on the pathogenicity of F. graminearum by physically interacting with the IG MAPK module FgSte50-Ste11-Ste7. In addition, the Fgsho1 deletion mutant exhibited increased sensitivity to cell wall stress agents, which is consistent with that FgSho1 positively regulates phosphorylation of FgMgv1. Moreover, membrane mucin FgMsb2 may also function upstream of MAPK module FgSte50-Ste11-Ste7 (Gu et al. 2015a, b).
To determine the effects of MAPK-deficient strains of F. graminearum, mutants deleted of all three MAPK genes (GPMK1/MAP1, MGV1, and FgHOG1) were generated in a recent study (Ren et al. 2022). The Gpmk1 mgv1 Fghog1 triple mutant is still viable but has severe defects in vegetative growth, conidiation, sexual reproduction, responses to various abiotic stresses, and bacterial- or fungal-fungal interactions. Moreover, the Gpmk1 mgv1 Fghog1 triple mutant is non-pathogenic towards the wheat head, wheat coleoptile, and corn silks (Ren et al. 2022).
The cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) signaling pathway is also an important signal transduction pathway in plant pathogenic fungi (Hu et al. 2014). In F. graminearum, CPK1 and CPK2 encode the catalytic subunit of PKA. Whereas the cpk1 mutant was defective in the development of penetration branches on plant surfaces, colonization of wheat rachises, and spreading in flowering wheat heads, the cpk2 mutant was normal in plant infection. Nevertheless, the cpk1 cpk2 double mutant is nonpathogenic, suggesting that Cpk1 and Cpk2 have an overlapping function in pathogenesis (Hu et al. 2014). PKR, the regulatory subunit of PKA plays a critical role in vegetative growth, viability of conidia, sexual reproduction, and plant infection (Li et al. 2018). In addition, the adenylate cyclase Fac1 and its associated protein FgCap1 were shown to be important for modulating the intracellular cAMP level and regulating vegetative and invasive growth of F. graminearum (Hu et al. 2014; Yin et al. 2018). In a recent study, FgSfl1 was characterized as a downstream transcription factor of PKA (Gong et al. 2021). Three PKA phosphorylation sites S223, T452, and S559 of FgSfl1 have distinct functions in fungal development and plant infection (Gong et al. 2021).
The regulation and functions of deoxynivalenol (DON) during infection of wheat
DON is an important virulence factor of F. graminearum
DON is a mycotoxin that binds to the ribosome to inhibit protein biosynthesis, resulting in disorders of cell signaling, differentiation, reproduction, and even teratogenicity in mammals (Pestka 2010; Chen et al. 2019). DON is also an important virulence factor of F. graminearum during infection of plants (Proctor et al. 1995; Bai et al. 2002; Jansen et al. 2005). The gene TRI5 encodes trichodiene synthase, which catalyzes the first step in trichothecene biosynthesis, cyclizing farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) to trichodiene (Hohn and Beremand 1989). The tri5 deletion mutant blocks DON production (Bai et al. 2002), and is restricted to the initially infected spikelets (Jansen et al. 2005), indicating that DON may facilitate the spread of F. graminearum throughout the wheat head. A comparative transcriptome study of symptomatic and symptomless wheat tissues revealed that TRI genes are highly induced in symptomless tissues, indicating a crucial role of DON in modulating host defenses and the establishment of infection (Brown et al. 2017). Metabolite profiling of F. graminearum wild-type and the tri5 deletion mutant in infected rachis nodes provides evidence to support the role of DON in the suppression of host defense-related metabolites (Bonnighausen et al. 2019). DON was shown to modulate programmed cell death (PCD) of plant cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Diamond et al. 2008; Diamond et al. 2013). During infection, F. graminearum may produce a higher concentration of DON to elicit hydrogen peroxide production via increasing the size of hyphal colony, which further stimulates PCD in wheat (Diamond et al. 2008, 2013) and thus promotes its switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Bonnighausen et al. 2019).
The biosynthesis of DON
A total of 15 TRI genes, including TRI5, are responsible for DON biosynthesis. These TRI genes are located at three different loci in the F. graminearum genome: a core TRI cluster that includes 12 genes, a TRI1–TRI16 locus, and the TRI101 locus (Alexander et al. 2009; Seong et al. 2009; Chen et al. 2019). Tri6 and Tri10 are considered as transcription factors regulating the expression of TRI genes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-Seq) revealed that Tri6 regulates genes involved in the biosynthesis and transport of DON, including TRI1, TRI3, TRI6, TRI7, TRI12, and TRI14 (Nasmith et al. 2011). The tri6 or tri10 deletion mutants are significantly reduced in pathogenicity and DON production. Transcriptome analysis showed that Tri6 regulates not only the expression of TRI genes but also the upstream isoprenoid pathway of DON biosynthesis (Seong et al. 2009). Differentially expressed genes identified in the tri10 deletion mutant are decreased in expression level relative to the tri6 deletion mutant. A total of 73% of genes (including some TRI genes and isoprenoid biosynthesis-related genes) with altered expression levels in the tri10 deletion mutant overlapped with those in the tri6 deletion mutant. Tri6 is likely a global regulator while Tri10 tends to be a specific transcription factor of the TRI gene cluster (Seong et al. 2009). Two cytochrome P450 oxygenases (Tri1 and Tri4) are localized to the remodeled endoplasmic reticulum, named toxisome, which is involved in early and late steps in DON biosynthesis under TRI-inducing conditions and during plant infection (Menke et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2019; Qiu et al. 2019). Tri12, a predicted 14-membrane-spanning domain MFS transporter, localizes to small motile vesicles, larger stationary vacuoles, and motile vesicles, likely dynamically interacting with toxisomes. Tri12-containing vesicles may accumulate or transfer DON to the vacuole and eventually export DON from F. graminearum cells (Alexander et al. 1999; Menke et al. 2012, 2013; Boenisch et al. 2017). F. graminearum class I myosin FgMyo1 interacts with Tri1 and actin to promote the formation of the toxisome (Tang et al. 2018). Inhibition of FgMyo1 and actin polymerization by phenamacril (JS399-19, a novel cyanoacrylate fungicide) and latrunculin A, respectively (Zhang et al. 2015; Tang et al. 2018), reduce toxisome formation and DON biosynthesis. These results suggest that the FgMyo1-actin cytoskeleton system is important for the organization of the toxisome (Chen et al. 2019).
Factors inducing DON production and mechanisms underlying the regulation of DON production
F. graminearum infection causes environmental changes, including nutrition, pH, and oxidative stress that are related to the induction of DON production (Ponts 2015; Chen et al. 2019). Significantly high levels of DON production induced by sucrose, 1-kestose and nystose were observed in F. graminearum (Jiao et al. 2008). CreA (Mig1 in yeast), the global regulator of carbon catabolite repression, negatively regulates the expression of genes required for utilizing carbon sources (Fernandez et al. 2014). Predicted binding sites of FgCreA are present in promoters of TRI1, TRI3-TRI8, TRI10, TRI12, and TRI101 (Hou and Wang 2018). Nevertheless, the exact roles of FgCreA in the regulation of DON biosynthesis are still unknown. Sucrose is the main carbon source transported from source to sink via highly specialized cells in the phloem vascular system (Xu et al. 2020) colonized by F. graminearum (Brown et al. 2010). Therefore, F. graminearum may hijack host sucrose transport pathways to facilitate its systemic infection by both utilization of host carbon sources and induction of DON biosynthesis.
Several nitrogen sources such as L-arginine, putrescine, agmatine, and guanine can stimulate DON production (Gardiner et al. 2009a). These compounds are either precursors or products in polyamine biosynthetic pathways. Plant polyamines are not only related to the generation of plant defense-related hydrogen peroxide and hydroxycinnamic acid amides, but are also involved in crosstalk with plant hormonal and signaling pathways such as salicylic acid (SA), abscisic acid (ABA), calcium, and nitric oxide (NO) (Gerlin et al. 2021). F. graminearum infection activates polyamine biosynthetic pathways and putrescine production in wheat heads, which further stimulates the biosynthesis of DON (Gardiner et al. 2010). Thus, F. graminearum appears to hijack wheat defense-related polyamines to produce virulence-associated DON and cause infection in plant. DON biosynthesis is regulated by FgAreA, a global regulator of nitrogen metabolism (Hou et al. 2015). FgAreA is translocated into the nucleus under nitrogen starvation conditions or in the presence of putrescine (Ma et al. 2021). Deletion of FgAreA suppresses the expression of TRI5, TRI6, and TRI10, and reduces DON production under the stimulation of arginine. FgAreA interacts with Tri10 for the transcriptional regulation of TRI genes (Hou et al. 2015). A recent study showed that FgAreA binds to the promoter regions of TRI genes to rearrange the nucleosome array. The exposure of nucleosome-free regions subsequently facilitates the deposition of histone H2B monoubiquitination (H2B ub1) and histone 3 lysine 4 di- and trimethylations (H3K4 me2/3) on TRI genes, which further activates the expression of TRI genes and promotes DON biosynthesis (Ma et al. 2021).
A low extracellular pH was reported to be a prerequisite for DON production in in vitro cultures of F. graminearum (Gardiner et al. 2009b; Merhej et al. 2010). Acidification induces the expression of TRI4, TRI5, TRI6, TRI10, and TRI101, while neutral growth PH induces neither the expression of TRI genes nor DON production (Merhej et al. 2010). Fungal transcription factor PacC is the key regulator that facilitates extra-cellular pH adaptation. Deletion of the PacC homolog FgPac1 showed an earlier TRI gene induction and DON production under acidic pH conditions. Constitutive expression of the dominant allele FgPac1c (truncated FgPac1, 1–490 amino acids) strongly repressed the expression of TRI genes (Merhej et al. 2011a). A total of 14 putative binding sites of FgPac1 were identified in the promoter region of TRI genes (Merhej et al. 2011b). However, the exact role of FgPac1 in the regulation of DON production still needs to be investigated. A recent study demonstrated that F. graminearum infection induces host to form an alkaline environment, under which the pH-dependent transcription factor FgPacC undergoes a proteolytic cleavage into the functional isoform named FgPacC30 (Gu et al. 2022).
Infection of a plant by phytopathogenic fungi induces a burst of H2O2, which is toxic to fungal pathogens and plays a critical role in plant defense signaling (Lehmann et al. 2015). DON production is induced by exogenous H2O2 in in vitro cultures (Ponts et al. 2006). During infection, defense-related H2O2 generated in plants stimulates the biosynthesis of DON. In addition, an improper fungicide dosage induces DON production, likely by stimulating the generation of H2O2. Treatment with prothioconazole induces a rapid hyperinduction of H2O2 that is required for DON production in F. graminearum (Audenaert et al. 2010). The transcription factor FgSkn7 is responsible for H2O2-induced TRI gene expression (Jiang et al. 2015). The promoters of multiple TRI genes, including TRI5–TRI10, TRI12, TRI14, and TRI101, contain putative FgSkn7-binding elements (Jiang et al. 2015).
DON production is not only affected by various environmental and plant factors but also regulated by intracellular signaling and epigenetic mechanism. Whereas deletion of PKA or FgFAC1 in the cAMP-PKA pathway reduces the biosynthesis of DON, the pde and pkr deletion mutants had an increased DON production (Jiang et al. 2016; Li et al. 2018; Yin et al. 2018). As an associated protein of FgFac1, FgCap1 is subject to feedback regulation mediated by Tri6 during DON production (Yin et al. 2018). Disruption of any one of the three MAPK signaling pathways or their downstream transcription factors results in a defect in DON production. Epigenetic regulation, including heterochromatin, histone methylation, and acetylation, are involved in the regulation of DON production (Ponts 2015; Chen et al. 2019). Deletion of the heterochromatin protein Hep1 represses the expression of TRI5 and TRI6 and consequently reduces DON production (Reyes-Dominguez et al. 2012). Deletion of HEP1 reduced the enrichment of the H3K9me3 heterochromatic mark in the promoters of TRI5 and TRI6 (Reyes-Dominguez et al. 2012). Kmt6, the putative histone H3 lysine 27 methylation (H3K27me) methyltransferase, is responsible for transcriptional suppression of genes involved in the biosynthesis of mycotoxins, pigments, and other secondary metabolites, including TRI4, TRI5, and TRI11 (Connolly et al. 2013). FgSet1-mediated H3K4me was reported to activate the expression of eight TRI genes (TRI3–TRI6, TRI9–TRI12) (Liu et al. 2015). Histone acetyltransferases FgGcn5, Elp3, and FgSas3 are involved in the activation of expression of TRI genes and DON production (Lee et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2018; Kong et al. 2018). Deletion of the histone deacetylase gene HDF1 results in a significant reduction in DON production and virulence in F. graminearum (Li et al. 2011). Moreover, Fng1 and Fng3, two Inhibitor of Growth (ING) proteins associated with histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) complexes, are important for DON production (Jiang et al. 2020b; Xu et al. 2022a).
Roles of F. graminearum-secreted enzymes and effectors in facilitating wheat infection by the pathogen
Secreted enzymes and proteins
Fungi secrete a variety of proteins, including cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs), proteases, lipases, oxidoreductases, and effectors into extracellular milieu to benefit their survival. More than 500 CWDEs have been identified in F. graminearum (Zhao et al. 2014). Some important secreted pathogenicity factors of F. graminearum were exhibited in Fig. 2. Transcriptome analysis showed that a large number of CWDE-coding genes are upregulated during F. graminearum infection (Zhang et al. 2012; Cao et al. 2021). Cytological observation of F. graminearum-infected wheat spikes using enzyme-gold and immune-gold labeling techniques showed that the cell wall components such as cellulose, xylan, and pectin were degraded, likely mediated by CWDEs secreted by F. graminearum (Wanjiru et al. 2002; Kang et al. 2007). F. graminearum-secreted CWDEs macerate plant tissues to liberate nutrients for the growth and development of the pathogen. A comparative transcriptome study of symptomless and symptomatic wheat tissues infected by F. graminearum revealed that CWDE-encoding genes were highly induced in both symptomless and symptomatic wheat tissues, suggesting their important roles in different infection stages (Brown et al. 2017). The pectin methylesterase PME cooperates with polygalacturonase (PG) to degrade highly methyl-esterified pectin and promote the infection (Sella et al. 2016). F. graminearum-generated endo-polygalacturonase Pg and xylanase Xyr1 share a synergistic role during plant infection. The pg xyr1 double deletion mutants but not the single mutants were significantly reduced in virulence (Paccanaro et al. 2017). ROS (reactive oxygen species) generated by the host is suppressed by F. graminearum- secreted exo-1,5-a-L-arabinanase Arb93B (Hao et al. 2019). The xylanase gene XylA derived from F. graminearum is involved in the degradation of D-xylose, the main component of cereal plant cell walls (Tini et al. 2020). Functional redundancy is a common property of CWDEs in plant pathogenic fungi (Xu et al. 2018). Although transcription levels of five of the seven feruloyl esterase-coding genes of F. graminearum are increased during infection of plant, deletion of them individually showed no obvious reduction in pathogenicity (Balcerzak et al. 2012). In addition to CWDEs, the tomatinase-like enzyme FgTom, KP4-like proteins, the putative catalase-peroxidase KatG2 and Fca7, and cerato-platanins were verified to be involved in F. graminearum-host interactions to some extent (Voigt et al. 2005; Carere et al. 2017; Lee et al. 2018; Guo et al. 2019; Lu and Faris 2019; Quarantin et al. 2019b; Eranthodi et al. 2022).
Generally, effectors are defined as pathogen-secreted factors that alter the interaction between pathogen and host (Varden et al. 2017; Tariqjaveed et al. 2021). To suppress host defense, plant pathogens secrete a variety of effectors into the plant apoplast or directly into plant cells to manipulate plant physiology and immunity system and suppress host defense responses (Wang et al. 2022). The hemibiotrophic lifestyle of F. graminearum suggests that this pathogen may be equipped with a broad arsenal of effectors (Gorash et al. 2021). Indeed, a recent study has identified multiple candidate effector genes and a total of 357 effectors in F. graminearum, which constitute the core effectome of the pathogen (Rocher et al. 2022). The lipase Fgl1 is secreted by F. graminearum to suppress the immunity-related callose deposition of the host (Blümke et al. 2014). An orphan secreted protein Osp24 in F. graminearum functions as a cytoplasmic effector targeting TaSnRK1α for degradation and is important for the pathogenicity of F. graminearum (Fig. 2; Jiang et al. 2020a). Three secreted protein-encoded genes, FGSG_01831 (Accession number in the comprehensive reference annotation YL1 for PH-1: FG1G27550), FGSG_03599 (FG2G27040), and FGSG_12160 (FG1G38440), were highly expressed in F. graminearum when the pathogen infects wheat tissues; two of them suppressed Bax-induced cell death, while all of them interfered with chitin-triggered ROS generation; nevertheless, the deletion mutants of each of these effector genes were normal in pathogenicity (Hao et al. 2020a).
In recent years, fungal nonproteinaceous effectors, such as small RNA (sRNA) effectors and secondary metabolites (chemical effectors), generate a paradigm shift in interactions between plants and phytopathogenic fungi (Collemare et al. 2019). A F. graminearum sRNA, Fg-sRNA1, promotes pathogen infection by silencing wheat defense-related TaCEBiP (Jian and Liang 2019). Two nonribosomal octapeptides, fusaoctaxin A and B biosynthesized by the gene cluster fg3_54, were identified as virulence factors of F. graminearum (Jia et al. 2019; Tang et al. 2021). Fusaoctaxin A alters the subcellular localization of chloroplasts in the coleoptile cells and prevents callose accumulation in plasmodesmata during pathogen infection, which facilitates the cell-to-cell invasion of F. graminearum in wheat tissues (Jia et al. 2019). In contrast, Fusaoctaxin B contributes to virulence by disrupting the normal chloroplast distribution (Tang et al. 2021).
Wheat components involved in interactions with F. graminearum
Innate immunity confers wheat resistance to F. graminearum
Fungal infection usually activates plant immune responses such as the influx of calcium ion (Ca2+), ROS burst, transcriptional reprogramming, antimicrobial substance production, and callose deposition (Xu et al. 2022b). Transcriptome and proteome profiling are efficient approaches for the identification of wheat genes that are associated with FHB resistance (Kazan and Gardiner 2018; Pan et al. 2018; Liu et al., 2019). Two leucine-rich repeat-RKs and two RKs with lectin domain-coding genes have been identified by transcriptome sequencing of three FHB-resistant wheat genotypes (Nyubai, Wuhan 1, and HC374) and one susceptible wheat genotype (Shaw) (Pan et al. 2018). The leucine-rich receptor-like kinase gene TaLRRK-6D is induced in wheat by DON treatment during the early stage of F. graminearum infection. Silencing of TaLRRK-6D compromises wheat resistance to F. graminearum by suppressing the expression of salicylic acid signaling genes, including ICS1, PAL, NPR1, NPR3-like, and NPR4 (Thapa et al. 2018). The transcription level of wheat wall-associated kinase gene TaWAK2A-800 is increased when plants are treated with chitin or infected by F. graminearum. Defense-related genes such as TaCERK1, TaRLCK1B, and TaMPK3 are down-regulated in TaWAK2A-800 RNAi wheat lines that are susceptible to F. graminearum (Guo et al. 2021).
FHB resistance genes identified by quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping
FHB resistance in wheat is inherited quantitatively and controlled by either major or minor QTL (Waldron et al. 1999; Semagn et al. 2007). More than 600 QTL distributed among all 21 chromosomes in wheat have been detected by linkage mapping or association mapping (Liu et al. 2009; Ma et al. 2020; Zheng et al. 2021). However, only seven FHB-resistant QTL (Fhb1–Fhb7) have been formally designated (Guo et al. 2015; Singh et al. 2016; Hao et al. 2020b).
To date, two FHB resistance genes Fhb1 and Fhb7 have been cloned by QTL mapping. Rawat et al. (2016) reported the map-based cloning of Fhb1 from Sumai 3 and showed that the pore-forming toxin-like gene PFT is responsible for Fhb1-mediated resistance through mutation analysis, gene silencing, and overexpression. In two recent studies, Su et al. (2019) and Li et al. (2019) independently identified a histidine-rich calcium-binding gene (TaHRC or HisR) adjacent to PFT as a new Fhb1 candidate. Su et al. (2019) demonstrated that TaHRC is a susceptibility gene, a deletion spanning the start codon of this gene results in FHB resistance. Li et al. (2019) proposed that HisR is a gain-of-function mutation, and that the newly generated protein enhances wheat immunity. The contrasting functions of Fhb1 suggest the complexity of wheat-F. graminearum interaction. Cloning of Fhb1 has contributed substantially toward the improvement of breeding wheat with FHB resistance worldwide. Fhb7 was cloned from Thinopyrum elongatum, a species used in wheat distant hybridization breeding (Wang et al. 2020a). Fhb7 encodes a glutathione S-transferase which detoxifies trichothecene and overexpression of Fhb7 in wheat variety KN199 enhanced the FHB resistance of wheat (Wang et al. 2020a).
Effector-based identification of wheat components against F. graminearum
In-depth knowledge of pathogen-host interactions shines a light on the development of breeding strategies (Li et al. 2021). With the Osp24 as a bait, TaSnRK1α was identified as an interacting protein of Osp24. Overexpression and silencing of TaSnRK1α enhanced and attenuated wheat resistance to FHB, respectively (Jiang et al. 2020a). TaSnRK1α was previously identified as an interacting protein of a DON response wheat orphan protein TaFROG, which is associated with FHB resistance (Perochon et al. 2015). Osp24 and TaFROG interacted competitively with the same C-terminal region of TaSnRK1α (267–499 aa). Overexpression of TaFROG may improve FHB resistance by preventing TaSnRK1α degradation mediated by the ubiquitin-26S proteasome system (Jiang et al. 2020a). Besides, TaFROG also interacts with the wheat NAC-like transcription factor TaNacL-D1. Overexpression of TaNACL-D1 enhances wheat resistance to FHB (Perochon et al. 2019). Therefore, effectors discovered in the F. graminearum-wheat interaction may direct the identification of resistant and susceptible components that can be utilized to develop FHB resistance in wheat.
Susceptibility of wheat to FHB
Susceptibility genes in plants are negative regulators of plant immunity or the genes hijacked by pathogens to promote their colonization and growth (van Schie and Takken 2014). A susceptibility QTL was identified in the long arm of chromosome 2A by QTL-mapping (Garvin et al. 2009). A type II FHB susceptibility factor was identified in wheat chromosome 4D by point-inoculating wheat lines possessing barley chromosome introgressions. Wheat lines del4DS-3 and del4DS-1, which contain larger deletions of chromosome 4D, confer resistance to FHB, suggesting the susceptibility factor exists in this deletion region (Hales et al. 2020). Silencing of TaLpx-1, the wheat homolog of Arabidopsis LOX1 and LOX5, enhances wheat resistance to FHB, demonstrating that TaLpx-1 acts as a susceptibility gene during the F. graminearum-wheat interaction (Nalam et al. 2015). Silencing of ethylene receptor gene EIN2 in wheat enhances FHB resistance and reduces DON content in the inoculated heads (Chen et al. 2009). Silencing of the wheat stearoyl-acyl carrier protein fatty acid desaturase gene TaSSI2 enhances FHB resistance by depressing the SA signaling pathway in wheat (Hu et al. 2018). In addition, RNAi-mediated knockdown of the auxin receptor gene TaTIR1 enhances wheat FHB resistance (Su et al. 2021). Silencing or knockout of a DON-induced transcription factor TaNFXL1 enhances wheat resistance to FHB, suggesting that TaNFXL1 is a susceptibility gene during F. graminearum-wheat interaction (Brauer et al. 2020). Counteracting these susceptibility factors and genes may contribute to the future development of FHB-resistant wheat varieties.
Conclusions and perspectives
F. graminearum genes as potential targets for HIGS- and SIGS-based disease control
To date, hundreds of genes important for fungal development, pathogenesis, and DON production have been widely identified in F. graminearum. RNA interference of those genes may inhibit the growth and infection of F. graminearum, which potentially can be used for FHB control. HIGS (host-induced gene silencing) and SIGS (spray-induced gene silencing) have been developed to silence F. graminearum genes including CHS3b, FgPP1, FgSGE1, FgSTE12, and CYP51 (Cheng et al. 2015; Koch et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2020b). Further functional characterization of F. graminearum genes will lay the foundation for the generation of HIGS transgenic wheat and the development of nucleic acid pesticides.
Interfering with the signaling sensing of F. graminearum to block the transitions between saprophytic and pathogenic growth
Fungicides (including benzimidazoles, triazoles, carboximides, and JS399-19) strongly inhibited the growth of F. graminearum and tended to be efficient strategies for the control of FHB in the field (Zhang et al. 2015; Zhou et al. 2020). However, F. graminearum frequently developed resistance against these fungicides under selection pressure. As a hemibiotrophic pathogen, F. graminearum has both saprophytic and pathogenic growth in its life cycle. Instead of killing the fungus, a potential alternative strategy is blocking the initiation of infection without inhibiting saprophytic growth. Host signals sensing mediates the transitions from saprophytic growth to pathogenic growth phases, and is also required for the activation of DON biosynthesis. Wheat anthers are rich in various nutrients and have stimulating compounds to stimulate the virulence of F. graminearum (Jiang et al. 2019). Moreover, plant-derived polyamines act as a cue to trigger DON biosynthesis (Gardiner et al. 2010). Intracellular signaling pathways are coordinately involved in responses to various plant signals recognized by a variety of F. graminearum receptors. Reducing wheat-derived cues to weaken the stimulation from the host plant or interfering with the signaling sensing by inhibiting the function of F. graminearum-secreted receptors (or the downstream signaling) may be useful approaches to improve FHB resistance.
F. graminearum-secreted protein as bait to capture and identify resistance and susceptibility genes in wheat
A large number of in planta-specific upregulation secreted protein-encoded genes were identified from the omics studies, although only a few of them have been functionally characterized. These secreted proteins may enter the plant cells to modulate the functions of plant genes. Whereas some of them interact with resistance genes to suppress plant defense responses (Jiang et al. 2020a), others may target susceptibility genes to facilitate the invasive growth of F. graminearum (Fig. 2). Recently, the full-length transcriptome annotation of F. graminearum was generated (Lu et al. 2022), which facilitates the comprehensive identification of additional secreted proteins. With more secreted proteins being functionally characterized in F. graminearum, it will be possible to identify their host targets and even the exact interaction sites. CRISPR/Cas9 system has provided an efficient tool for generating site-specific mutations in genes of interest (Grutzner et al. 2021). Disrupting the targeted gene of F. graminearum by gene editing will likely enhance the FHB resistance of wheat. In contrast, disrupting the susceptibility genes may interfere with the compatibility between the host and the pathogens and consequently provide broad-spectrum disease resistance (Zaidi et al. 2018). The overexpression of plant resistance proteins often comes with a trade-off with growth, but gene editing of the pathogen-targeting sites may not affect the biological function of host genes and will not produce significant deleterious effects on the yield and quality traits of wheat.
Use of other pathosystems to identify genes for developing resistance against F. graminearum
Arabidopsis and Brachypodium distachyon are two model plants that have been used to study F. graminearum-plant interactions (Chen et al. 2009; Peraldi et al. 2011; Brewer and Hammond-Kosack 2015). Multiple genes related to Arabidopsis resistance and susceptibility to F. graminearum have been identified in the past 10 years (Brewer and Hammond-Kosack 2015). In addition, F. graminearum can infect intact foliar tissues of the monocotyledonous model species B. distachyon, indicating that B. distachyon is also a valuable model plant for the study of FHB (Peraldi et al. 2011; Brewer and Hammond-Kosack 2015). Further investigation of the interactions between these two model plants with F. graminearum may provide new clues to study the wheat-F. graminearum interaction and facilitate the development of strategies to improve wheat resistance against F. graminearum.
Availability of data and materials
- Ca2+ :
Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing
Cell wall-degrading enzymes
Cell wall integrity
Fusarium head blight
Host-induced gene silencing
Programmed cell death
Protein kinase A
Quantitative trait loci
Reactive oxygen species
Spray-induced gene silencing
Alexander NJ, McCormick SP, Hohn TM. TRI12, a trichothecene efflux pump from Fusarium sporotrichioides: gene isolation and expression in yeast. Mol Gen Genet. 1999;261:977–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380051046.
Alexander NJ, Proctor RH, McCormick SP. Genes, gene clusters, and biosynthesis of trichothecenes and fumonisins in Fusarium. Toxin Rev. 2009;28:198–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15569540903092142.
Appels R, Eversole K, Stein N, Feuillet C, Keller B, Rogers J, et al. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science. 2018;361:eaar7191. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7191.
Audenaert K, Callewaert E, Hofte M, de Saeger S, Haesaert G. Hydrogen peroxide induced by the fungicide prothioconazole triggers deoxynivalenol (DON) production by Fusarium graminearum. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:112. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-112.
Bai GH, Desjardins AE, Plattner RD. Deoxynivalenol-nonproducing Fusarium graminearum causes initial infection, but does not cause disease spread in wheat spikes. Mycopathologia. 2002;153:91–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014419323550.
Balcerzak M, Harris LJ, Subramaniam R, Ouellet T. The feruloyl esterase gene family of Fusarium graminearum is differentially regulated by aromatic compounds and hosts. Fungal Biol. 2012;116:478–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2012.01.007.
Blümke A, Falter C, Herrfurth C, Sode B, Bode R, Schäfer W, et al. Secreted fungal effector lipase releases free fatty acids to inhibit innate immunity-related callose formation during wheat head infection. Plant Physiol. 2014;165:346–58. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.236737.
Boenisch MJ, Schäfer W. Fusarium graminearum forms mycotoxin producing infection structures on wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:110. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-110.
Boenisch MJ, Broz KL, Purvine SO, Chrisler WB, Nicora CD, Connolly LR, et al. Structural reorganization of the fungal endoplasmic reticulum upon induction of mycotoxin biosynthesis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44296. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44296.
Bonnighausen J, Schauer N, Schafer W, Bormann J. Metabolic profiling of wheat rachis node infection by Fusarium graminearum-decoding deoxynivalenol-dependent susceptibility. New Phytol. 2019;221:459–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15377.
Brauer EK, Balcerzak M, Rocheleau H, Leung W, Schernthaner J, Subramaniam R, et al. Genome editing of a deoxynivalenol-induced transcription factor confers resistance to Fusarium graminearum in wheat. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2020;33:553–60. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-11-19-0332-R.
Brewer HC, Hammond-Kosack KE. Host to a stranger: Arabidopsis and Fusarium ear blight. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20:651–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.011.
Brown NA, Urban M, van de Meene AML, Hammond-Kosack KE. The infection biology of Fusarium graminearum: defining the pathways of spikelet to spikelet colonisation in wheat ears. Fungal Biol. 2010;114:555–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2010.04.006.
Brown NA, Evans J, Mead A, Hammond-Kosack KE. A spatial temporal analysis of the Fusarium graminearum transcriptome during symptomless and symptomatic wheat infection. Mol Plant Pathol. 2017;18:1295–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12564.
Brown NA, Schrevens S, van Dijck P, Goldman GH. Fungal G-protein-coupled receptors: mediators of pathogenesis and targets for disease control. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:402–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0127-5.
Cao X, Li D, Lu P, Wang Q, Jiang C, Liu H. Transcriptome analysis of ascomycete fungal pathogen Fusarium graminearum at different life-cycle stages using strand-specific RNA-seq. J Plant Protect. 2021;48:1466–78. https://doi.org/10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2021.2021902 ((in Chinese)).
Carere J, Benfield AH, Ollivier M, Liu CJ, Kazan K, Gardiner DM. A tomatinase-like enzyme acts as a virulence factor in the wheat pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet Biol. 2017;100:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2017.01.007.
Chen X, Steed A, Travella S, Keller B, Nicholson P. Fusarium graminearum exploits ethylene signalling to colonize dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants. New Phytol. 2009;182:975–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02821.x.
Chen Y, Wang J, Yang N, Wen Z, Sun X, Chai Y, et al. Wheat microbiome bacteria can reduce virulence of a plant pathogenic fungus by altering histone acetylation. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3429. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05683-7.
Chen Y, Kistler HC, Ma Z. Fusarium graminearum Trichothecene mycotoxins: biosynthesis, regulation, and management. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2019;57:15–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-082718-100318.
Cheng W, Song X, Li H, Cao L, Sun K, Qiu X, et al. Host-induced gene silencing of an essential chitin synthase gene confers durable resistance to Fusarium head blight and seedling blight in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015;13:1335–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12352.
Collemare J, O’Connell RJ, Lebrun M. Nonproteinaceous effectors: the terra incognita of plant-fungal interactions. New Phytol. 2019;223:590–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15785.
Connolly LR, Smith KM, Freitag M. The Fusarium graminearum histone H3 K27 methyltransferase KMT6 regulates development and expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003916.
Dean R, Van KJ, Pretorius ZA, Hammond-Kosack KE, Di Pietro A, Spanu PD, et al. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol. 2012;13:414–30. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003916.
Desmond OJ, Manners JM, Stephens AE, Maclean DJ, Schenk PM, Gardiner DM, et al. The Fusarium mycotoxin deoxynivalenol elicits hydrogen peroxide production, programmed cell death and defence responses in wheat. Mol Plant Pathol. 2008;9:435–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1364-3703.2008.00475.X.
Diamond M, Reape TJ, Rocha O, Doyle SM, Kacprzyk J, Doohan FM, et al. The Fusarium mycotoxin deoxynivalenol can inhibit plant apoptosis-like programmed cell death. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e69542. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069542.
Dilks T, Halsey K, De Vos RP, Hammond-Kosack KE, Brown NA. Non-canonical fungal G-protein coupled receptors promote Fusarium head blight on wheat. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15:e1007666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007666.
Dill-Macky R, Jones RK. The effect of previous crop residues and tillage on Fusarium head blight of wheat. Plant Dis. 2000;84:71–6. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.1.71.
Dweba CC, Figlan S, Shimelis HA, Motaung TE, Sydenham S, Mwadzingeni L, et al. Fusarium head blight of wheat: pathogenesis and control strategies. Crop Prot. 2017;91:114–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.10.002.
El-Defrawy MMH, Hesham AEL. G-protein-coupled receptors in fungi. In: Hesham AL, Upadhyay R, Sharma G, Manoharachary C, Gupta V, editors. Fungal Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Fungal Biology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020. p. 37–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41870-0_3
Eranthodi A, González-Peña Fundora D, Montenegro Alonso AP, Bakkeren G, Subramaniam R, Ouellet T, et al. Cerato-platanin protein 1 is not critical for Fusarium graminearum growth and aggressiveness, but its overexpression provides an edge to Fusarium head blight in wheat. Can J Plant Pathol. 2022;44:577–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2022.2044910.
Fernandez J, Marroquin-Guzman M, Wilson RA. Mechanisms of nutrient acquisition and utilization during fungal infections of leaves. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2014;52:155–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-050135.
Gardiner DM, Kazan K, Manners JM. Nutrient profiling reveals potent inducers of trichothecene biosynthesis in Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet Biol. 2009a;46:604–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2009.04.004.
Gardiner DM, Osborne S, Kazan K, Manners JM. Low pH regulates the production of deoxynivalenol by Fusarium graminearum. Microbiology. 2009b;155:3149–56. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.029546-0.
Gardiner DM, Kazan K, Praud S, Torney FJ, Rusu A, Manners JM. Early activation of wheat polyamine biosynthesis during Fusarium head blight implicates putrescine as an inducer of trichothecene mycotoxin production. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:289. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-289.
Garvin DF, Stack RW, Hansen JM. Quantitative trait locus mapping of increased Fusarium head blight susceptibility associated with a wild emmer wheat chromosome. Phytopathology. 2009;99:447–52. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-99-4-0447.
Gerlin L, Baroukh C, Genin S. Polyamines: double agents in disease and plant immunity. Trends Plant Sci. 2021;26:1061–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.05.007.
Gong C, Huang J, Sun D, Xu D, Guo Y, Kang J, et al. FgSfl1 and its conserved PKA phosphorylation sites are important for conidiation, sexual reproduction, and pathogenesis in Fusarium graminearum. J Fungi. 2021;7:755. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7090755.
Gorash A, Armonienė R, Kazan K. Can effectoromics and loss-of-susceptibility be exploited for improving Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat? Crop J. 2021;9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.06.012.
Grutzner R, Martin P, Horn C, Mortensen S, Cram EJ, Lee-Parsons C, et al. High-efficiency genome editing in plants mediated by a Cas9 gene containing multiple introns. Plant Commun. 2021;2:100135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2020.100135.
Gu Q, Chen Y, Liu Y, Zhang C, Ma Z. The transmembrane protein FgSho1 regulates fungal development and pathogenicity via the MAPK module Ste50-Ste11-Ste7 in Fusarium graminearum. New Phytol. 2015a;206:315–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13158.
Gu Q, Zhang C, Liu X, Ma Z. A transcription factor FgSte12 is required for pathogenicity in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2015b;16:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12155.
Gu Q, Wang Y, Zhao X, Yuan B, Zhang M, Tan Z, et al. Inhibition of histone acetyltransferase GCN5 by a transcription factor FgPacC controls fungal adaption to host-derived iron stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:6190–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac498.
Guo J, Zhang X, Hou Y, Cai J, Shen X, Zhou T, et al. High-density mapping of the major FHB resistance gene Fhb7 derived from Thinopyrum ponticum and its pyramiding with Fhb1 by marker-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet. 2015;128:2301–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2586-x.
Guo Y, Yao S, Yuan T, Wang Y, Zhang D, Tang W. The spatiotemporal control of KatG2 catalase-peroxidase contributes to the invasiveness of Fusarium graminearum in host plants. Mol Plant Pathol. 2019;20:685–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12785.
Guo F, Wu T, Xu G, Qi H, Zhu X, Zhang Z. TaWAK2A-800, a wall-associated kinase, participates positively in resistance to Fusarium head blight and sharp eyespot in wheat. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:11493. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111493.
Hales B, Steed A, Giovannelli V, Burt C, Lemmens M, Molnár-Láng M, et al. Type II Fusarium head blight susceptibility conferred by a region on wheat chromosome 4D. J Exp Bot. 2020;71:4703–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa226.
Hao G, McCormick S, Vaughan MM, Naumann TA, Kim H, Proctor R, et al. Fusarium graminearum arabinanase (Arb93B) enhances wheat head blight susceptibility by suppressing plant immunity. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2019;32:888–98. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-06-18-0170-R.
Hao G, McCormick S, Usgaard T, Tiley H, Vaughan MM. Characterization of three Fusarium graminearum effectors and their roles during Fusarium head blight. Front Plant Sci. 2020a;11:579553. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.579553.
Hao Y, Rasheed A, Zhu Z, Wulff B, He Z. Harnessing wheat Fhb1 for Fusarium resistance. Trends Plant Sci. 2020b;25:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.10.006.
Hazard B, Trafford K, Lovegrove A, Griffiths S, Uauy C, Shewry P. Strategies to improve wheat for human health. Nature Food. 2020;1:475–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0134-6.
Hohn TM, Beremand PD. Isolation and nucleotide sequence of a sesquiterpene cyclase gene from the trichothecene-producing fungus Fusarium sporotrichioides. Gene. 1989;79:131–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(89)90098-X.
Hou R, Wang C. The function of the carbon metabolism regulator FgCreA in Fusarium graminearum. Sci Agric Sin. 2018;51:257–67. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.02.006.
Hou R, Jiang C, Zheng Q, Wang C, Xu J. The AreA transcription factor mediates the regulation of deoxynivalenol (DON) synthesis by ammonium and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signalling in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2015;16:987–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12254.
Hu S, Zhou X, Gu X, Cao S, Wang C, Xu J. The cAMP-PKA pathway regulates growth, sexual and asexual differentiation, and pathogenesis in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2014;27:557–66. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-10-13-0306-R.
Hu L, Mu J, Su P, Wu H, Yu G, Wang G, et al. Multi-functional roles of TaSSI2 involved in Fusarium head blight and powdery mildew resistance and drought tolerance. J Integr Agr. 2018;17:368–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61680-0.
Jansen C, von Wettstein D, Schafer W, Kogel KH, Felk A, Maier FJ. Infection patterns in barley and wheat spikes inoculated with wild-type and trichodiene synthase gene disrupted Fusarium graminearum. Proc Natl Acad SCI USA. 2005;102:16892–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508467102.
Jenczmionka NJ, Schäfer W. The Gpmk1 MAP kinase of Fusarium graminearum regulates the induction of specific secreted enzymes. Curr Genet. 2005;47:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-004-0547-z.
Jenczmionka NJ, Maier FJ, Lösch AP, Schäfer W. Mating, conidiation and pathogenicity of Fusarium graminearum, the main causal agent of the head-blight disease of wheat, are regulated by the MAP kinase gpmk1. Curr Genet. 2003;43:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-003-0379-2.
Jia L, Tang H, Wang W, Yuan T, Wei W, Pang B, et al. A linear nonribosomal octapeptide from Fusarium graminearum facilitates cell-to-cell invasion of wheat. Nat Commun. 2019;10:922. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08726-9.
Jian J, Liang X. One small RNA of Fusarium graminearum targets and silences CEBiP gene in common wheat. Microorganisms. 2019;7:425. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100425.
Jiang J, Yun Y, Fu J, Shim WB, Ma Z. Involvement of a putative response regulator FgRrg-1 in osmotic stress response, fungicide resistance and virulence in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2011;12:425–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00684.x.
Jiang C, Zhang S, Zhang Q, Tao Y, Wang C, Xu J. FgSKN7 and FgATF1 have overlapping functions in ascosporogenesis, pathogenesis and stress responses in Fusarium graminearum. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:1245–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12561.
Jiang C, Zhang C, Wu C, Sun P, Hou R, Liu H, et al. TRI6 and TRI10 play different roles in the regulation of deoxynivalenol (DON) production by cAMP signalling in Fusarium graminearum. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:3689–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13279.
Jiang C, Zhang X, Liu H, Xu J. Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in plant pathogenic fungi. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1006875. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006875.
Jiang C, Cao S, Wang Z, Xu H, Liang J, Liu H, et al. An expanded subfamily of G-protein-coupled receptor genes in Fusarium graminearum required for wheat infection. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1582–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0468-8.
Jiang C, Hei R, Yang Y, Zhang S, Wang Q, Wang W, et al. An orphan protein of Fusarium graminearum modulates host immunity by mediating proteasomal degradation of TaSnRK1α. Nat Commun. 2020a;11:4382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18240-y.
Jiang H, Xia A, Ye M, Ren J, Li D, Liu H, et al. Opposing functions of Fng1 and the Rpd3 HDAC complex in H4 acetylation in Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Genet. 2020b;16:e1009185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009185.
Jiao F, Kawakami A, Nakajima T. Effects of different carbon sources on trichothecene production and Tri gene expression by Fusarium graminearum in liquid culture. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;285:212–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01235.x.
Jonkers W, Dong Y, Broz K, Kistler HC. The Wor1-like protein Fgp1 regulates pathogenicity, toxin synthesis and reproduction in the phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002724. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002724.
Kang Z, Huang L, Han Q, Zhang H. Cytochemistry of cell wall component alterations in wheat spikes infected by Fusarium graminearum. Acta Phytopathol Sin. 2007;37:623–8. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0412-0914.2007.06.011 ((in Chinese)).
Kazan K, Gardiner DM. Transcriptomics of cereal-Fusarium graminearum interactions: what we have learned so far. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19:764–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12561.
Koch A, Biedenkopf D, Furch A, Weber L, Rossbach O, Abdellatef E, et al. An RNAi-based control of Fusarium graminearum infections through spraying of long dsRNAs involves a plant passage and is controlled by the fungal silencing machinery. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005901. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005901.
Kong X, van Diepeningen AD, van der Lee TAJ, Waalwijk C, Xu J, Xu J, et al. The Fusarium graminearum histone acetyltransferases are important for morphogenesis, DON biosynthesis, and pathogenicity. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2078.00654.
Lee Y, Min K, Son H, Park AR, Kim J, Choi GJ, et al. ELP3 is involved in sexual and asexual development, virulence, and the oxidative stress response in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2014;27:1344–55. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-05-14-0145-R.
Lee Y, Son H, Shin JY, Choi GJ, Lee Y. Genome-wide functional characterization of putative peroxidases in the head blight fungus Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19:715–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12557.
Lehmann S, Serrano M, L’Haridon F, Tjamos SE, Metraux J. Reactive oxygen species and plant resistance to fungal pathogens. Phytochemistry. 2015;112:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.08.027.
Li Y, Wang C, Liu W, Wang G, Kang Z, Kistler HC, et al. The HDF1 histone deacetylase gene is important for conidiation, sexual reproduction, and pathogenesis in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2011;24:487–96. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-10-10-0233.
Li Y, Wang G, Xu JR, Jiang C. Penetration peg formation and invasive hyphae development require stage-specific activation of MoGTI1 in Magnaporthe oryzae. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2016;29:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-06-15-0142-R.
Li C, Zhang Y, Wang H, Chen L, Zhang J, Sun M, et al. The PKR regulatory subunit of protein kinase A (PKA) is involved in the regulation of growth, sexual and asexual development, and pathogenesis in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19:909–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12576.
Li G, Zhou J, Jia H, Gao Z, Fan M, Luo Y, et al. Mutation of a histidine-rich calcium-binding-protein gene in wheat confers resistance to Fusarium head blight. Nat Genet. 2019;51:1106–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0426-7.
Li Q, Wang B, Yu J, Dou D. Pathogen-informed breeding for crop disease resistance. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021;63:305–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13029.
Liu S, Hall MD, Griffey CA, McKendry AL. Meta-analysis of QTL associated with Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Crop Sci. 2009;49:1955–68. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.03.0115.
Liu N, Fan F, Qiu D, Jiang L. The transcription cofactor FgSwi6 plays a role in growth and development, carbendazim sensitivity, cellulose utilization, lithium tolerance, deoxynivalenol production and virulence in the filamentous fungus Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet Biol. 2013;58–59:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2013.08.010.
Liu Y, Liu N, Yin Y, Chen Y, Jiang J, Ma Z. Histone H3K4 methylation regulates hyphal growth, secondary metabolism and multiple stress responses in Fusarium graminearum. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:4615–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12993.
Liu J, Li L, Foroud NA, Gong X, Li C, Li T. Proteomics of bulked rachides combined with documented QTL uncovers genotype nonspecific players of the Fusarium head blight responses in wheat. Phytopathology. 2019;109:111–9. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-03-18-0086-R.
Lu S, Faris JD. Fusarium graminearum KP4-like proteins possess root growth-inhibiting activity against wheat and potentially contribute to fungal virulence in seedling rot. Fungal Genet Biol. 2019;123:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2018.11.002.
Lu P, Chen D, Qi Z, Wang H, Chen Y, Wang Q, et al. Landscape and regulation of alternative splicing and alternative polyadenylation in a plant pathogenic fungus. New Phytol. 2022;235:674–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18164.
Ma Z, Xie Q, Li G, Jia H, Zhou J, Kong Z, et al. Germplasms, genetics and genomics for better control of disastrous wheat Fusarium head blight. Theor Appl Genet. 2020;133:1541–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03525-8.
Ma T, Zhang L, Wang M, Li Y, Jian Y, Wu L, et al. Plant defense compound triggers mycotoxin synthesis by regulating H2B ub1 and H3K4 me2/3 deposition. New Phytol. 2021;232:2106–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17718.
Menke J, Dong Y, Kistler HC. Fusarium graminearum Tri12p Influences Virulence to Wheat and Trichothecene Accumulation. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012;25:1408–18. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-04-12-0081-R.
Menke J, Weber J, Broz K, Kistler HC. Cellular development associated with induced mycotoxin synthesis in the filamentous fungus Fusarium graminearum. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e63077. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063077.
Mentges M, Glasenapp A, Boenisch M, Malz S, Henrissat B, Frandsen RJN, et al. Infection cushions of Fusarium graminearum are fungal arsenals for wheat infection. Mol Plant Pathol. 2020;21:1070–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12960.
Merhej J, Boutigny AL, Pinson-Gadais L, Richard-Forget F, Barreau C. Acidic pH as a determinant of TRI gene expression and trichothecene B biosynthesis in Fusarium graminearum. Food Addit Contam a. 2010;27:710–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440040903514531.
Merhej J, Richard-Forget F, Barreau C. The pH regulatory factor Pac1 regulates Tri gene expression and trichothecene production in Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet Biol. 2011a;48:275–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2010.11.008.
Merhej J, Richard-Forget F, Barreau C. Regulation of trichothecene biosynthesis in Fusarium: recent advances and new insights. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2011b;91:519–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3397-x.
Nalam VJ, Alam S, Keereetaweep J, Venables B, Burdan D, Lee H, et al. Facilitation of Fusarium graminearum infection by 9-Lipoxygenases in Arabidopsis and wheat. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2015;28:1142–52. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-04-15-0096-R.
Nasmith CG, Walkowiak S, Wang L, Leung WW, Gong Y, Johnston A, et al. Tri6 is a global transcription regulator in the phytopathogen Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002266.
Paccanaro MC, Sella L, Castiglioni C, Giacomello F, Martínez-Rocha AL, D’Rvidio R, et al. Synergistic effect of different plant cell wall-degrading enzymes is important for virulence of Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2017;30:886–95. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-07-17-0179-R.
Pan Y, Liu Z, Rocheleau H, Fauteux F, Wang Y, McCartney C, et al. Transcriptome dynamics associated with resistance and susceptibility against fusarium head blight in four wheat genotypes. BMC Genom. 2018;19:642. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5012-3.
Park AR, Cho A, Seo J, Min K, Son H, Lee J, et al. Functional analyses of regulators of G protein signaling in Gibberella zeae. Fungal Genet Biol. 2012;49:511–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2012.05.006.
Peraldi A, Beccari G, Steed A, Nicholson P. Brachypodium distachyon: a new pathosystem to study Fusarium head blight and other Fusarium diseases of wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-100.
Perochon A, Jianguang J, Kahla A, Arunachalam C, Scofield SR, Bowden S, et al. TaFROG encodes a Pooideae orphan protein that interacts with SnRK1 and enhances resistance to the mycotoxigenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. Plant Physiol. 2015;169:2895–906. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01056.
Perochon A, Kahla A, Vranić M, Jia J, Malla KB, Craze M, et al. A wheat NAC interacts with an orphan protein and enhances resistance to Fusarium head blight disease. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17:1892–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13105.
Pestka JJ. Deoxynivalenol: mechanisms of action, human exposure, and toxicological relevance. Arch Toxicol. 2010;84:663–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-010-0579-8.
Ponts N. Mycotoxins are a component of Fusarium graminearum stress-response system. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01234.
Ponts N, Pinson-Gadais L, Verdal-Bonnin MN, Barreau C, Richard-Forget F. Accumulation of deoxynivalenol and its 15-acetylated form is significantly modulated by oxidative stress in liquid cultures of Fusarium graminearum. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;258:102–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00200.x.
Posas F, Wurgler-Murphy SM, Maeda T, Witten EA, Thai TC, Saito H. Yeast HOG1 MAP kinase cascade is regulated by a multistep phosphorelay mechanism in the SLN1–YPD1–SSK1 “two-component” osmosensor. Cell. 1996;86:865–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80162-2.
Proctor RH, Hohn TM, McCormick SP. Reduced virulence of Gibberella zeae caused by disruption of a trichothecene toxin biosynthetic gene. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1995;8:593–601. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-8-0593.
Qiu H, Zhao X, Fang W, Wu H, Abubakar YS, Lu G, et al. Spatiotemporal nature of Fusarium graminearum-wheat coleoptile interactions. Phytopathol Res. 2019;1:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42483-019-0033-7.
Quarantin A, Castiglioni C, Schäfer W, Favaron F, Sella L. The Fusarium graminearum cerato-platanins loosen cellulose substrates enhancing fungal cellulase activity as expansin-like proteins. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2019a;139:229–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.03.025.
Quarantin A, Hadeler B, Kröger C, Schäfer W, Favaron F, Sella L, et al. Different hydrophobins of Fusarium graminearum are involved in hyphal growth, attachment, water-air interface penetration and plant infection. Front Microbiol. 2019b;10:751. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00751.
Ramamoorthy V, Zhao X, Snyder AK, Xu J, Shah DM. Two mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling cascades mediate basal resistance to antifungal plant defensins in Fusarium graminearum. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:1491–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00887.x.
Rawat N, Pumphrey MO, Liu S, Zhang X, Tiwari VK, Ando K, et al. Wheat Fhb1 encodes a chimeric lectin with agglutinin domains and a pore-forming toxin-like domain conferring resistance to Fusarium head blight. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1576–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3706.
Ren J, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li C, Bian Z, Zhang X, et al. Deletion of all three MAP kinase genes results in severe defects in stress responses and pathogenesis in Fusarium graminearum. Stress Biol. 2022;2:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-021-00025-y.
Reyes-Dominguez Y, Boedi S, Sulyok M, Wiesenberger G, Stoppacher N, Krska R, et al. Heterochromatin influences the secondary metabolite profile in the plant pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet Biol. 2012;49:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2011.11.002.
Rocher F, Alouane T, Philippe G, Martin M, Label P, Langin T, et al. Fusarium graminearum infection strategy in wheat involves a highly conserved genetic program that controls the expression of a core effectome. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:1914. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031914.
Sella L, Castiglioni C, Paccanaro MC, Janni M, Schäfer W, D’Ovidio R, et al. Involvement of fungal pectin methylesterase activity in the interaction between Fusarium graminearum and wheat. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2016;29:258–67. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-07-15-0174-R.
Semagn K, Skinnes H, Bjørnstad Å, Marøy AG, Tarkegne Y. Quantitative trait loci controlling Fusarium head blight resistance and low deoxynivalenol content in hexaploid wheat population from ‘Arina’ and NK93604. Crop Sci. 2007;47:294–303. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.02.0095.
Seong K, Pasquali M, Zhou X, Song J, Hilburn K, McCormick S, et al. Global gene regulation by Fusarium transcription factors Tri6 and Tri10 reveals adaptations for toxin biosynthesis. Mol Microbiol. 2009;72:354–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06649.x.
Singh RP, Singh PK, Rutkoski J, Hodson DP, He X, Jorgensen LN, et al. Disease impact on wheat yield potential and prospects of genetic control. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2016;54:303–22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-095835.
Sridhar PS, Trofimova D, Subramaniam R, González-Peña Fundora D, Foroud NA, Allingham JS, et al. Ste2 receptor-mediated chemotropism of Fusarium graminearum contributes to its pathogenicity against wheat. Sci Rep. 2020;10:10770. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67597-z.
Su Z, Bernardo A, Tian B, Chen H, Wang S, Ma H, et al. A deletion mutation in TaHRC confers Fhb1 resistance to Fusarium head blight in wheat. Nat Genet. 2019;51:1099–105. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0425-8.
Su P, Zhao L, Li W, Zhao J, Yan J, Ma X, et al. Integrated metabolo-transcriptomics and functional characterization reveals that the wheat auxin receptor TIR1 negatively regulates defense against Fusarium graminearum. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021;63:340–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12992.
Tang G, Chen Y, Xu J, Kistler HC, Ma Z. The fungal myosin I is essential for Fusarium toxisome formation. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1006827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006827.
Tang Z, Tang H, Wang W, Xue Y, Chen D, Tang W, et al. Biosynthesis of a new fusaoctaxin virulence factor in Fusarium graminearum relies on a distinct path to form a guanidinoacetyl starter unit priming nonribosomal octapeptidyl assembly. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143:19719–30. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c07770.
Tariqjaveed M, Mateen A, Wang S, Qiu S, Zheng X, Zhang J, et al. Versatile effectors of phytopathogenic fungi target host immunity. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021;63:1856–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13162.
Thapa G, Gunupuru LR, Hehir JG, Kahla A, Mullins E, Doohan FM. A pathogen-responsive leucine rich receptor like kinase contributes to Fusarium resistance in cereals. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:867. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00867.
Tini F, Beccari G, Benfield AH, Gardiner DM, Covarelli L. Role of the XylA gene, encoding a cell wall degrading enzyme, during common wheat, durum wheat and barley colonization by Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet Biol. 2020;136:103318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2019.103318.
Trail F. For blighted waves of grain: Fusarium graminearum in the postgenomics era. Plant Physiol. 2009;149:103–10. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.129684.
Turrà D, El Ghalid M, Rossi F, Di Pietro A. Fungal pathogen uses sex pheromone receptor for chemotropic sensing of host plant signals. Nature. 2015;527:521–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15516.
Urban M, Mott E, Farley T, Hammond-Kosack K. The Fusarium graminearum MAP1 gene is essential for pathogenicity and development of perithecia. Mol Plant Pathol. 2003;4:347–59. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1364-3703.2003.00183.X.
van Schie CCN, Takken FLW. Susceptibility genes 101: how to be a good host. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2014;52:551–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-045854.
van Nguyen T, Kröger C, Bönnighausen J, Schäfer W, Bormann J. The ATF/CREB transcription factor Atf1 is essential for full virulence, deoxynivalenol production, and stress tolerance in the cereal pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2013;26:1378–94. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-04-13-0125-R.
Varden FA, de la Concepcion JC, Maidment JHR, Banfield MJ. Taking the stage: effectors in the spotlight. Curr Opin Plant Pathol. 2017;38:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2017.04.013.
Voigt CA, Schäfer W, Salomon S. A secreted lipase of Fusarium graminearum is a virulence factor required for infection of cereals. Plant J. 2005;42:364–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02377.x.
Waldron BL, Moreno Sevilla B, Anderson JA, Stack RW, Frohberg RC. RFLP mapping of QTL for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Crop Sci. 1999;39:805–11. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900030032x.
Walter S, Nicholson P, Doohan FM. Action and reaction of host and pathogen during Fusarium head blight disease. New Phytol. 2010;185:54–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03041.x.
Wang C, Zhang S, Hou R, Zhao Z, Zheng Q, Xu Q, et al. Functional analysis of the kinome of the wheat scab fungus Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002460.
Wang Q, Jiang C, Wang C, Chen C, Xu J, Liu H. Characterization of the two-speed subgenomes of Fusarium graminearum reveals the fast-speed subgenome specialized for adaption and infection. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00140.
Wang M, Wu L, Mei Y, Zhao Y, Ma Z, Zhang X, et al. Host-induced gene silencing of multiple genes of Fusarium graminearum enhances resistance to Fusarium head blight in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18:2373–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13401.
Wang H, Sun S, Ge W, Zhao L, Hou B, Wang K, et al. Horizontal gene transfer of Fhb7 from fungus underlies Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Science. 2020a;368:eaba5435. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba5435.
Wang Y, Pruitt RN, Nürnberger T, Wang Y. Evasion of plant immunity by microbial pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022;20:449–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-022-00710-3.
Wanjiru WM, Zhensheng K, Buchenauer H. Importance of cell wall degrading enzymes produced by Fusarium graminearum during infection of wheat heads. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2002;108:803–10. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020847216155.
Wilson WW, McKee G, Nganje W, Dahl B, Bangsund D. Economic impact of USWBSI’s scab initiative to reduce FHBp; 2017. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/264672/. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
Wood M, Comis D, Hardin B, McGraw L, Stelljes KB. Fighting Fusarium. Agr Res. 1999;47:18.
Xu M, Gao X, Chen J, Yin Z, Feng H, Huang L. The feruloyl esterase genes are required for full pathogenicity of the apple tree canker pathogen Valsa mali. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19:1353–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12619.
Xu Q, Yin S, Ma Y, Song M, Song Y, Mu S, et al. Carbon export from leaves is controlled via ubiquitination and phosphorylation of sucrose transporter SUC2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:6223–30. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912754117.
Xu H, Ye M, Xia A, Jiang H, Huang P, Liu H, et al. The Fng3 ING protein regulates H3 acetylation and H4 deacetylation by interacting with two distinct histone-modifying complexes. New Phytol. 2022a;235:2350–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18294.
Xu M, Li G, Guo Y, Gao Y, Zhu L, Liu Z, et al. A fungal microRNA-like RNA subverts host immunity and facilitates pathogen infection by silencing two host receptor-like kinase genes. New Phytol. 2022b;233:2503–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17945.
Xue C, Hsueh YP, Heitman J. Magnificent seven: roles of G protein-coupled receptors in extracellular sensing in fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:1010–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00131.x.
Yang C, Liu H, Li G, Liu M, Yun Y, Wang C, et al. The MADS-box transcription factor FgMcm1 regulates cell identity and fungal development in Fusarium graminearum. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:2762–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12747.
Yin T, Zhang Q, Wang J, Liu H, Wang C, Xu J, et al. The cyclase-associated protein FgCap1 has both protein kinase A-dependent and -independent functions during deoxynivalenol production and plant infection in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19:552–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12540.
Yu H, Seo J, Kim J, Han K, Shim W, Yun S, et al. Functional analyses of heterotrimeric G protein Gα and Gβ subunits in Gibberella zeae. Microbiology. 2008;154:392–401. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.2007/012260-0.
Yun Y, Liu Z, Zhang J, Shim W, Chen Y, Ma Z. The MAPKK FgMkk1 of Fusarium graminearum regulates vegetative differentiation, multiple stress response, and virulence via the cell wall integrity and high-osmolarity glycerol signaling pathways. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16:2023–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12334.
Zaidi SS, Mukhtar MS, Mansoor S. Genome Editing: Targeting susceptibility genes for plant disease resistance. Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36:898–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.04.005.
Zhang X, Jia L, Zhang Y, Jiang G, Li X, Zhang D, et al. In planta stage-specific fungal gene profiling elucidates the molecular strategies of Fusarium graminearum growing inside wheat coleoptiles. Plant Cell. 2012;24:5159–76. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.105957.
Zhang C, Chen Y, Yin Y, Ji H, Shim W, Hou Y, et al. A small molecule species specifically inhibits Fusarium myosin I. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:2735–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12711.
Zhang X, Wang Z, Jiang C, Xu J. Regulation of biotic interactions and responses to abiotic stresses by MAP kinase pathways in plant pathogenic fungi. Stress Biol. 2021;11:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-021-00004-3.
Zhao Z, Liu H, Wang C, Xu JR. Correction: Comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi. BMC Genom. 2014;15:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-274.
Zheng D, Zhang S, Zhou X, Wang C, Xiang P, Zheng Q, et al. The FgHOG1 pathway regulates hyphal growth, stress responses, and plant infection in Fusarium graminearum. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e49495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049495.
Zheng T, Hua C, Li L, Sun Z, Yuan M, Bai G, et al. Integration of meta-QTL discovery with omics: Towards a molecular breeding platform for improving wheat resistance to Fusarium head blight. The Crop J. 2021;9:739–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.10.006.
Zhou Z, Duan Y, Zhou M. Carbendazim-resistance associated β2-tubulin substitutions increase deoxynivalenol biosynthesis by reducing the interaction between β2-tubulin and IDH3 in Fusarium graminearum. Environ Microbiol. 2020;22:598–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14874.
Zhu Z, Hao Y, Mergoum M, Bai G, Humphreys G, Cloutier S, et al. Breeding wheat for resistance to Fusarium head blight in the Global North: China, USA, and Canada. Crop J. 2019;7:730–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2019.06.003.
We apologize to colleagues whose studies were not cited owing to space limitations. We thank Dr. Jin-Rong Xu and Dr. Larry Dunkle at Purdue University, for critical reading of this manuscript.
This work was supported by grants from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Special Support (2022T150537) to MX, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32172378) and Shaanxi Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (2022JC-14) to CJ.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, M., Wang, Q., Wang, G. et al. Combatting Fusarium head blight: advances in molecular interactions between Fusarium graminearum and wheat. Phytopathol Res 4, 37 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42483-022-00142-0
- Signaling pathway
- Virulence factor
- Disease resistance
- Susceptibility factor
- Resistance improvement