- Research
- Open Access
- Published:
Treatment with succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor Y12196 protects strawberries from boscalid-resistant Botrytis cinerea with the H272R mutation in SDH B
Phytopathology Research volume 5, Article number: 22 (2023)
Abstract
Gray mold, caused by Botrytis cinerea, poses a significant threat to the strawberry industry worldwide. B. cinerea is a high-risk pathogen in the sense of fungicide resistance. The sensitivities of B. cinerea isolates collected from Zhejiang Province, China, to the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHIs) boscalid and Y12196 were determined based on discriminatory dose or 50% effective concentration (EC50). Of the 42 isolates collected in 2018, 15 were resistant to boscalid (35.7%), and 3 were resistant to Y12196 (7.1%). Among the 84 isolates collected in 2019, the EC50 values for boscalid ranged from 0.097 to 54.162 mg/L, while the EC50 values for Y12196 ranged from 0.284 to 20.147 mg/L. Sequence analysis showed that the B. cinerea isolates carrying P225F (proline → phenylalanine) and N230I (asparagine → isoleucine) mutations in SDH subunit B exhibited cross-resistance between boscalid and Y12196. However, boscalid-resistant isolates with a point mutation at position 272 of SDH B (H272R, histidine → arginine) were more sensitive to Y12196. Consistent with this, Y12196, but not boscalid, could successfully inhibit the growth of B. cinerea carrying the H272R mutation (BcSDHB−H272R) on detached strawberries and leaves. Molecular docking simulations further revealed that the hydrogen bonds and π-π interactions were formed between Y12196 and BcSDHB−H272R, but not between boscalid and BcSDHB−H272R, explaining why the boscalid-resistant B. cinerea H272R mutant isolates were sensitive to Y12196. Together, our results suggested that Y12196 could effectively control boscalid resistance associated with the H272R mutation.
Background
Strawberries are among the most popular fruit crops worldwide due to their high nutritional content and sweet taste. China is the largest strawberry producer in the world (Wang et al. 2021). In Zhejiang Province alone, about 5333 ha are dedicated to the strawberry crop, with an annual yield of 100,000 tons and a total output value of more than RMB 1.5 billion (Liao and Hu 2018). However, the profitability of the strawberry industry worldwide is seriously threatened by gray mold disease, which is caused by the fungus Botrytis cinerea Pers (Boff et al. 2001).
In modern production, fungicide application is the most effective and economical strategy for controlling B. cinerea in the fields (Liu et al. 2016; Petrasch et al. 2019). Fungicides with a single-site mode of action, such as carbendazim (benzimidazoles, MBCs), procymidone (dicarboximides, DCFs), fludioxonil (phenypyrroles), difenoconazole (demethylation inhibitors, DMIs), azoxystrobin (quinone outside inhibitors, QoIs), and boscalid (succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, SDHIs) have been used to manage gray mold throughout the world (Sun et al. 2010; Fan et al. 2017; Petrasch et al. 2019; Weber et al. 2019; Shao et al. 2021). However, with the continuous use of fungicides in the field, B. cinerea isolates have developed resistance, causing the fungicides to be ineffective (Mosbach et al. 2017; Rupp et al. 2017; Amiri et al. 2020; Toffolatti et al. 2020). Fungicide resistance in B. cinerea was severe in China; for example, carbendazim, pyrimethanil, and procymidone are no longer effective in controlling gray mold on tomato and grape in Shandong and Jiangsu provinces (Sun et al. 2010; Zheng et al. 2019). In addition, multiple resistance to fungicides has been commonly detected in B. cinerea from various hosts such as strawberry, cherry, nectarine, tomato, grape, and vegetable crops (Sun et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2010; Fan et al. 2017; Adnan et al. 2018; Yin et al. 2018; Zheng et al. 2019).
SDHIs are a class of compounds that can target the mitochondrial respiratory Complex II or succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), a key enzyme in the tricarboxylic acid cycle and the mitochondrial respiratory chain (Sierotzki and Scalliet 2013). Boscalid, an SDHI fungicide, was the first SDHI to control a broad range of fungal pathogens in many host plants (Stammler et al. 2015). Because boscalid inhibits SDH function in B. cinerea, this fungicide is extremely effective in controlling gray mold (Sierotzki and Scalliet 2013; Hua 2018). However, B. cinerea has been shown to develop strong resistance to boscalid in the field following continuous fungicide applications (Veloukas et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2016). Previous studies have shown that specific amino acid point mutations at different positions in three B. cinerea SDH subunits (B, C, and D) were attributed to resistance against SDHIs, including boscalid (Stammler et al. 2015; Rupp et al. 2017). In recent years, the boscalid-resistant B. cinerea isolates have been detected frequently in China and are mainly caused by point mutations in SDH subunit B. In Shandong Province, the field boscalid-resistant B. cinerea isolates were confirmed to carry point mutations of P225F, N230I, H272Y, and H272R in SDH subunit B (He et al. 2020; Cui et al. 2021). In Shanghai, Hubei, and Zhejiang provinces, the H272R mutation in B. cinerea was the primary cause of boscalid resistance in greenhouse strawberries (Fan et al. 2017; Lin et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2018). Amino acid mutations in the sdh gene also contribute to SDHI resistance in other fungal plant pathogens (Avenot et al. 2012, 2014; Wang et al. 2015). To date, fluopyram, pydiflumetofen, and penthiopyrad also have been reported to have inhibitory activities on B. cinerea growth (Amiri et al. 2014; Vitale et al. 2016; He et al. 2020). Positive cross-resistance was always detected amongst the fungicides with the same mechanisms of action; however, there were exceptions. For instance, no positive cross-resistance was observed between boscalid and fluopyram, even though they both belong to SDHI fungicides (Laleve et al. 2014).
Y12196 (N-(2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) phenyl)-3-(difluoromethyl) -1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide) (Additional file 1: Figure S1) is a new SDHI that was developed using pharmacophore-linked fragment virtual screening (PFVS) by Central China Normal University, and it has bioactivity against Rhizoctonia solani and Sphaerotheca fuliginea (Xiong et al. 2017; Shi et al. 2018). Like boscalid, Y12196 has an amide moiety, an aromatic ring, and a nitrogen-containing heterocycle (Additional file 1: Figure S1). These chemical structures are essential for fungicidal activity because they facilitate hydrogen bonds and π-π interactions between SDHI and pathogen SDH (Horsefield et al. 2006; Ruprecht et al. 2009). The structure–activity relationship between Y12196 and SDH is affected by the structure of the pyrazole-carboxamide-benzoxazol hybrid of Y12196 (-CF2H on the pyrazole ring, 2,4-dichloro on the aromatic ring; Additional file 1: Figure S1). Indeed, Y12196 decreased the SDH enzyme activity, which was assessed by evaluating succinate-DCIP reductase activity (Xiong et al. 2015, 2017). Previously, Y12196 was shown to control Fusarium head blight caused by an isolate of Fusarium asiaticum carrying the A64V mutation in the SDH subunit C, which is associated with resistance to the SDHI fungicide pydiflumetofen (Chen et al. 2021). However, to our knowledge, the sensitivity of strawberry-infecting B. cinerea to Y12196 has not yet been investigated. In this study, we aimed to address this knowledge gap by evaluating the ability of Y12196 to control gray mold and to assess the cross-resistance of B. cinerea to Y12196 and boscalid. Specifically, we aimed to (i) investigate the sensitivity of the B. cinerea isolates from strawberry to Y12196; (ii) explore the differences between the fungicidal activities of Y12196 and boscalid in B. cinerea; and (iii) reveal the mechanisms underlying the differences in fungicidal mode of action between Y12196 and boscalid.
Results
Resistance of the B. cinerea isolates to Y12196 and boscalid
The B. cinerea isolates (n = 42) collected in 2018 were assessed for their sensitivity to Y12196 based on the discriminatory dose of 5 mg/L. The result showed that the spore germination of 39 isolates was significantly inhibited when they grew on YBA plates amended with 5 mg/L Y12196, and the spore germination rate varied from 4.8 to 9.5% (Fig. 1a); 15 isolates showed the spore germination rates above 90% on YBA plates supplemented with 5 mg/L boscalid (Fig. 1a). In addition, of the 42 isolates, 3 isolates (representative isolate TXB-4) showed spore germination rates above 90% on YBA plates amended with 5 mg/L Y12196 or 5 mg/L boscalid (Fig. 1a). Thus, 35.7% of the B. cinerea isolates were resistant to boscalid, while only 7.1% of the isolates were resistant to Y12196. Similar results were also observed for the mycelial growth of the isolates at 96 h (Fig. 1b).
Response of Botrytis cinerea isolates collected in 2018 to Y12196 and boscalid. Spore germination (a) and mycelial growth (b) of isolates were observed at 16 h and 96 h after isolates grew on the fungicide-YBA plate, and the isolates grown on methanol-YBA were used as control (Control). The B. cinerea isolate B05.10, was sensitive to both Y12196 and boscalid. The YSBOSS isolate PB-4 was sensitive to both Y12196 and boscalid. The YSBOSR isolate ZB-4 was sensitive to Y12196 but resistant to boscalid. The YRBOSR isolate TXB-4 was resistant to both Y12196 and boscalid
EC50 values of the B. cinerea isolates for Y12196 and boscalid
To precisely determine the sensitivity of the B. cinerea isolates to Y12196 and boscalid, EC50 values of 84 B. cinerea isolates collected in 2019 were assessed based on 50% mycelial growth inhibition. The EC50 values varied from 0.284 to 20.147 mg/L for Y12196, with an average EC50 value (± standard error, SE) of 5.582 ± 0.478 mg/L. For most of the 84 isolates tested (84.5%), the EC50 values were between 0.284 to 9.885 mg/L, with about 53.6% of the assayed isolates having an EC50 of less than 5 mg/L. A single B. cinerea isolate had an EC50 value greater than 20 mg/L for Y12196 (Fig. 2a).
Y12196 and boscalid sensitivity of the Botrytis cinerea isolates collected from Zhejiang Province in 2019. Frequency distributions of EC50 values for Y12196 (a) and boscalid (b) against 84 B. cinerea isolates. c Correlation between Y12196 and boscalid. EC50, 50% effective concentration value inhibiting mycelial growth
The EC50 values ranged from 0.097 to 54.162 mg/L for boscalid, with an average EC50 of 13.452 ± 1.297 mg/L (Fig. 2b). About a quarter of the 84 isolates tested (24 isolates; 28.6%) had the EC50 values less than 5 mg/L, and another quarter (20 isolates; 23.8%) had the EC50 values greater than 20 mg/L. These data suggested that the B. cinerea populations were more sensitive to Y12196 than boscalid. However, for the 84 isolates collected in 2019, there was a positive correlation between sensitivity to Y12196 and boscalid (ρ = 0.575, P < 0.05; Fig. 2c).
Mutations of SDH linked with boscalid resistance
The PCR-amplified SDH subunits B, C, and D were 1114, 712, and 784 bp long, respectively. Compared to the reference sdh B, sdh C, and sdh D genes, several mutations in the SDH subunits B and C were detected in the field isolates collected in 2018 and 2019 (Fig. 3 and Additional file 2: Table S1). In particular, we identified three types of point mutations in SDH subunit B, associated with boscalid resistance: P225F (CCC → TTC at codon 225); N230I (AAC → ATC at codon 230); and H272R (CAC → CGC at codon 272) (Fig. 3a). Among the 42 isolates collected in 2018, the H272R mutation was the most common (twelve isolates, 28.6%), followed by N230I (two isolates, 4.8%), and P225F (one isolate, 2.4%) (Fig. 3b). Importantly, the isolates carrying the H272R mutation were sensitive to Y12196, whereas the isolates carrying the P225F mutation or N230I mutation were resistant to Y12196 (YRBOSR, Fig. 1a).
Characterization of mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit B in Botrytis cinerea isolates. a Four genotypes of the SDH B subunit were found in this study. Sequence alignment was done using partial SDH B subunit nucleotide (nt) sequences: P225F, mutation changed the codon 225 from CCC (P) to TTC (F); N230I, mutation changed the codon 230 from AAC (N) to ATC (I); H272R, mutation changed the codon 272 from CAC (H) to CGC (R); 680, 700 and 820 indicated that bases position at 680, 700, 820 in the sdh B gene, respectively; green box, orange box and red box indicated that the codon 225, 230 and 272 of SDH B, respectively. b Frequency of the four genotypes found in field isolates in 2018 and 2019. The numbers on the bar were the frequency of each mutant
The B. cinerea isolates carrying the P225F, N230I, and H272R mutations were also detected among the 84 isolates collected in 2019 (Fig. 3b): 3 (3.6%), 19 (22.6%), and 42 (50%) isolates carried, respectively. Consistent with 2018, the B. cinerea isolates carrying the H272R mutation were the dominant mutants in field isolates collected in 2019. Of the 42 H272R mutants collected in 2019, 38 isolates had an EC50 lower value for Y12196 than for boscalid (Additional file 2: Table S1). The average EC50 values of these 38 H272R mutant isolates were 4.889 ± 0.518 mg/L for Y12196 and 20.089 ± 1.913 mg/L for boscalid, respectively, indicating that the majority of H272R mutants were somewhat more sensitive to Y12196 than to boscalid.
Among the 126 isolates collected in 2018 and 2019, 27 the sdh C-mutant isolates were detected, including 25 isolates carrying four concurrent mutations (G85A, I93V, M158V, and V168I) and 2 isolates carrying double mutations (I93V and V168I or G85A and V168I). Of the sdh C-mutant isolates collected in 2019, 86.7% (13/15) were the isolates with the H272R mutation, and 13.3% (2/15) were the isolates without the H272R mutation (Additional file 2: Table S1).
Efficacy of Y12196 and boscalid against the H272R isolates on detached fruits and leaves
Four isolates, including two isolates without the H272R mutation (B05.10 and PB-4) and two H272R mutant isolates (ZB-4 and JDGZ-9), were used to investigate the control efficacy of Y12196 and boscalid on detected fruits and leaves. Both Y12196 and boscalid significantly inhibited the growth of isolate B05.10 and PB-4 on strawberry fruits. Treatment with up to 500 mg/L boscalid did not, however, inhibit the growth of the ZB-4 and JDGZ-8 isolates, which carried the H272R mutation, on strawberry fruits (Fig. 4a). In contrast, treatment with 240 mg/L Y12196 noticeably inhibited the growth of the ZB-4 and JDGZ-8 isolates on strawberry fruits, and strawberries treated with 480 mg/L Y12196 showed no evidence of mold growth within 3 days of inoculation (Fig. 4a).
Control efficacy of Y12196 for Botrytis cinerea infections on strawberry fruits and leaves. a Compared in vivo performances of Y12196 and boscalid in controlling gray mold on strawberries. Fruits were treated with Y12196 (240 mg/L and 480 mg/L) or boscalid (250 mg/L and 500 mg/L) before inoculating with a conidial suspension of B. cinerea isolates. Lesion diameter (b) and control efficacy (c) on leaves treated with Y12196 and boscalid. Leaves sprayed with 80 mg/L Y12196 or 80 mg/L boscalid before inoculating with isolates. Values are shown as the means ± SE of ten lesions measured in two independent experiments. Bars with different lowercase letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Fisher’s least significant difference test (lesion diameter); asterisks denote significant difference (P < 0.05) and NS denotes no statistical significance according to Student’s t-test (control efficacy). B05.10 and PB-4, the isolates lacking the H272R mutation; ZB-4 and JDGZ-8, the isolates with the H272R mutation in SDH B
Similarly, both Y12196 and boscalid inhibited the development of the B05.10 and PB-4 isolates on leaves. However, only Y12196 effectively inhibited the development of the ZB-4 and JDGZ-8 isolates (Fig. 4b). Lesion development was significantly decreased on the leaves sprayed with 80 mg/L boscalid or 80 mg/L Y12196, compared with the water treatment, for all the four isolates (Fig. 4b). For the B. cinerea isolates without the H272R mutation, application of Y12196 or boscalid resulted in a similar control efficacy. For the B05.10 isolate, the control efficacies of Y12196 and boscalid at 80 mg/L were 69.81% and 75.47%, respectively, and for the PB-4 isolate were 59.68% and 64.52%, respectively (Fig. 4c). However, the control efficacy of the Y12196 application for the H272R mutants was significantly higher than that obtained for boscalid application. For example, spray application of 80 mg/L Y12196 provided a control efficacy of 65.78% for the H272R mutant isolate ZB-4, significantly higher (P = 0.004) than that observed for boscalid application (Fig. 4c).
Molecular docking of Y12196 to B. cinerea SDH (BcSDH)
Using the crystal structure of SDH from the porcine heart as a template, we predicted the structure of BcSDH with high credibility (Additional file 1: Figure S2b, c). The binding mode of Y12196 to BcSDH was similar to that of boscalid to BcSDH (Fig. 5a, c): one hydrogen bond was present between the B_W229 residue of SDH and the amide oxygen atom of SDHI, while the other hydrogen bond was formed between the C_S84 residue of SDH and the pyrazole nitrogen of Y12196 (Fig. 5a) or the pyridine nitrogen of boscalid (Fig. 5c). The dichlorobenzene rings of both SDHIs also exhibited π-π interactions with the C_W228 residue of SDH (Fig. 5a, c). In contrast, no hydrogen bonds or π-π interactions were observed between boscalid and BcSDH carrying the H272R mutation (BcSDHB−H272R) (Fig. 5d). However, the binding mode of Y12196 with BcSDHB−H272R showed that a hydrogen bond was formed between BcSDHB−H272R residue C_H71 and the amide oxygen atom of Y12196, while π-π interactions were observed between the Y12196 aromatic ring and the B_W229, C_81, C_Y75, and C_H71 residues of BcSDHB−H272R (Fig. 5b). These results indicated that the binding affinity of boscalid for BcSDHB−H272R was broken, and that of Y12196 for BcSDHB−H272R was kept. This may theoretically explain why the B. cinerea H272R mutants were resistant to boscalid and sensitive to Y12196.
Docking prediction for Y12196 (green sticks) or boscalid (yellow sticks) with BcSDH or BcSDHBH272R. Binding of Y12196 to BcSDH (a), Y12196 to BcSDHBH272R (b), boscalid to BcSDH (c), and boscalid to BcSDHBH272R (d). The dotted line indicated the distance between the H atom and O/N atoms in the protein–ligand complex; white sticks indicated that H atoms; BcSDH: Botrytis cinerea without the H272R mutation; BcSDHBH272R: Botrytis cinerea carrying the H272R mutation
Discussion
Strawberry gray mold, caused by the fungus B. cinerea, is a major threat to strawberry production. Several SDHI fungicides have recently been developed and released for field use, including boscalid (BASF), fluopyram (Bayer), and pydiflumetofen (Syngenta). These fungicides have quickly become widely used in many countries (Hua 2018; Sang et al. 2018; Duan et al. 2019; He et al. 2020; Neves and Bradley 2020). However, continuous application over several years has led to increasing levels of SDHI fungicide resistance. For example, the emergence of boscalid-resistant B. cinerea has sharply reduced the control efficacy of boscalid against gray mold (Veloukas et al. 2011; Toffolatti et al. 2020; Cui et al. 2021). Here, we showed that Y12196, an SDHI newly developed using PFVS, has a different mode of bioactivity against B. cinerea compared with boscalid. Although we detected some positive cross-resistance between Y12196 and boscalid in a few B. cinerea isolates tested, fungicide sensitivity monitoring and control efficacy assays showed that the B. cinerea H272R mutants were resistant to boscalid and were sensitive to Y12196.
In the present study, we collected 126 B. cinerea isolates from strawberry greenhouses in Zhejiang Province. Sensitivity testing showed that boscalid-resistant B. cinerea isolates were found in 2018 and 2019. Mutations in B. cinerea SDH subunit B have previously been shown to be associated with SDHI fungicide resistance (Fernández-Ortuño et al. 2012; Veloukas et al. 2013; Amiri et al. 2014; Stammler et al. 2015; Rupp et al. 2017): mutations at amino acids 225 (P225F/L/T), 230(N230I), and H272L of the SDH B subunit were responsible for the resistance to boscalid, fluopyram isopyrazam, and penthiopyrad; H272R and H272Y mutants showed resistance to boscalid and isopyrazam. Among these, SDH B-H272R and SDH B-H272Y mutations in B. cinerea were the most frequently detected in the field boscalid-resistant isolates. Similarly, in other plant pathogenic fungi, amino acid substitutions at the conserved histidine residue in the SDH B subunit (H260R in Blumeriella jaapii, H277R/Y in Alternaria alternata, and H267Y in Sclerotinia homoeocarpa) were the main mutation types for boscalid resistance (Avenot et al. 2012, 2014; Popko et al. 2018; Outwater et al. 2019). Furthermore, in B. cinerea, the H132R mutation within SDH subunit D was also detected in the boscalid-resistant isolates in the field, albeit at a lower frequency (Leroux et al. 2010). There were seventy-nine sdhB-mutant isolates detected, including 54 B. cinerea isolates carrying the H272R mutation, 21 isolates carrying the N230I mutation, and 4 isolates carrying the P225F mutation, which were responsible for boscalid resistance. In recent years, the H272Y and P225F mutations in the SDH B subunit were the main mutation types for boscalid-resistant isolates in Shandong Province (He et al. 2020; Cui et al. 2021). However, in Zhejiang Province, the H272R mutants were the dominant boscalid-resistant populations, which was in agreement with a previous study (Lin et al. 2018). Meanwhile, SDH B-H272 L/Y, SDH B-P225L/T, and SDH D-H132R mutations were not detected in the field isolates collected in Zhejiang Province.
Twelve B. cinerea H272R mutant isolates were collected in 2018, and the spore germination of each strain was inhibited by Y12196, a new SDHI, while not significantly inhibited by boscalid. Furthermore, of the 38 H272R mutant isolates collected in 2019, each strain had a lower EC50 value for Y12196 than for boscalid. Meanwhile, Y12196 was also confirmed to effectively inhibit the development of boscalid-resistant B. cinerea H272R mutants on detached strawberry fruits and leaves. These results showed that SDH B-H272R boscalid-resistant isolates were sensitive to Y12196, which is in agreement with several previous studies that revealed the H272R mutation in B. cinerea SDH does not confer resistance to fluopyram and pydiflumetofen (Laleve et al. 2014; He et al. 2020). Moreover, the absence or lack of cross-resistance between boscalid and structurally different SDHI fungicides in boscalid-resistant mutants carrying SDH B mutations also has been observed in other fungal species, such as A. alternata, Corynespora cassiicola, and D. bryoniae (Ishii et al. 2011; Avenot et al. 2012, 2014).
Structural differences between SDHIs may suggest differences in binding properties to the target SDH of pathogenic fungi. As shown previously (Horsefield et al. 2006; Ruprecht et al. 2009), the binding modes of SDHIs with SDH are crucial for fungicidal activity. The affinity of a given SDHI for SDH is determined by hydrogen bonds and π-π interactions formed between SDH and the aromatic ring and amide moiety of the SDHI (Stammler et al. 2015). Mutations at various positions in three SDH subunits (B, C, and D) may alter the binding mode of the SDHI with fungal SDH, reducing binding affinity and fungicidal activity (Horsefield et al. 2006; Ruprecht et al. 2009). Several studies suggest that boscalid-resistant mutants carrying SDH B mutations do not affect their binding to fluopyram may be linked to the molecular structure of this benzamide derivative and its interaction with SDH B (Leroux et al. 2010; Ishii et al. 2011). Y12196 was designed and synthesized as an SDHI, and it was a diphenyl ether-containing pyrazole-carboxamide derivative: 2,4-dichloro on the aromatic ring in Y12196 is favorable to its binding to SDH (Xiong et al. 2015, 2017). Molecular docking simulations showed that the binding affinity between Y12196 and the H272R mutant was maintained by a hydrogen bond and π-π interactions involving the Y12196 amide oxygen atom and aromatic ring. In contrast, neither hydrogen bonds nor π-π interactions were formed between boscalid and BcSDHB−H272R. This suggested that the sensitivity of the B. cinerea H272R mutant to Y12196 resulted from the maintenance of binding affinity due to the formation of new bonds and interactions between Y12196 and BcSDHB−H272R.
In the current study, we also detected mutations in B. cinerea SDH subunit C in 12 of the 42 isolates collected in 2018 and 15 of the 84 isolates collected in 2019. Previously, it was shown that the amino acids at positions 85, 93, 158, and 168 in B. cinerea SDH C were located in the binding pocket, and that the simultaneous mutation of these amino acids reduced the sensitivity of B. cinerea to fluopyram (Amiri et al. 2020). Interestingly, other studies found that simultaneous mutations of the same amino acids did not affect boscalid resistance (Cui et al. 2021; Liu et al. 2021). Consistent with these studies, we detected simultaneous mutations of these four amino acids (G85A, I93V, M158V, and V168I) in subunit C of wild-type SDH and SDH carrying the H272R mutation in subunit B. Thus, our results also suggested that these mutations in SDH C subunit do not affect the sensitivity of B. cinerea to boscalid and Y12196.
Conclusions
In this study, H272R was the most common mutation conferring boscalid resistance among the B. cinerea isolates collected in 2018 and 2019 in Zhejiang Province, and Y12196 has bioactivity against the H272R mutants. Therefore, we suggest that Y12196 might have potential utility for controlling boscalid-resistant gray mold infections in strawberries. We also propose that the protein of mutants found in the field and created in the lab can be utilized as a direct target when developing a new fungicide.
Methods
Fungicides and media
Potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium (200 g potato, 20 g glucose, and 20 g agar in 1 L sterile deionized water) was prepared and used for routine growth and sporulation assays. In addition, yeast peptone acetate (YBA) medium (10 g yeast extract, 10 g Bacto peptone, 20 g sodium acetate, and 15 g agar in 1 L sterile deionized water) was prepared and used to determine fungal sensitivity to Y12196 and boscalid.
Boscalid (98% active ingredient) and Y12196 (90% active ingredient) were each dissolved in 100% methanol to prepare stock solutions of 40,000 mg/L. Each stock solution was stored in the dark at 4°C. Commercial formulations of Y12196 (24% SC; Zhengbang Group, Jiangxi, China) and boscalid (Cantus 50% WG; BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany) were used in the detached strawberry fruit and leaf assays.
Evaluation of the sensitivity of B. cinerea to Y12196 and boscalid
In 2018, diseased strawberries were collected from five strawberry greenhouses located 500 m apart in Jiande County in Zhejiang Province. All sampled greenhouses were in conventional production without the Y12196 application. Spores collected from diseased fruits were directly transferred onto 2% water agar plates supplemented with 50 mg/L streptomycin sulfate, and the plates were incubated at 22°C for 12 h. From these plates, 42 single-conidial B. cinerea isolates were obtained.
Resistance of the 42 isolates to boscalid and Y12196 was assessed using a conidial germination assay on YBA medium amended with 5 mg/L of each fungicide, as described previously (Vitale et al. 2016). Conidial suspensions of each strain (2 × 105 spores/mL) were prepared, and 5 µL drops of each conidial suspension were added to separate YBA medium plates amended with 5 mg/L of Y12196 or boscalid. Spores were added to YBA plates with methanol as a control. The spore germination rate of each isolate was calculated after 16 h incubation at 22°C: spore germination was quantified at three sites by counting 100 conidia per site, and the germination percentage was calculated. We distinguished between the SDHI-resistant isolates (i.e., germ tube growth was clearly visible at an SDHI concentration of 5 mg/L, and > 90% of the conidia were able to germinate well) and the SDHI-sensitive isolates (i.e., < 10% of the conidia were able to germinate at 5 mg/L) (Kim and Xiao 2010; Fernández-Ortuño et al. 2012; Amiri et al. 2014). Each treatment was replicated three times, and the entire experiment was performed three times. The mycelial growth of each isolate was observed at 96 h.
Determination of the EC50 of Y12196 and boscalid for B. cinerea mycelial growth
To determine the sensitivity of B. cinerea isolates to boscalid and Y12196, the field B. cinerea isolates collected in 2019, their EC50 values for boscalid and Y12196 were calculated based on mycelial growth as described previously (Wu et al. 2020). We collected 84 single-conidial B. cinerea isolates from strawberry greenhouses in four counties of Zhejiang Province in 2019: Jiande, Xiaoshan, Yuhang, and Shaoxing. There was no Y12196 application in these greenhouses. A fresh mycelium plug (5 mm in diameter) was taken from the edge of each colony and placed on YBA plates amended with 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 mg/L of Y12196 or boscalid. If the EC50 value was below this dose range, the mycelium plug was transferred to the center of a YBA plate amended with 0, 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1 mg/L Y12196 or boscalid. Conversely, if the EC50 was above this dose range, the mycelium plug was transferred to the center of a YBA plate amended with Y12196 or boscalid at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 mg/L. Each treatment was replicated three times, and the entire experiment was performed three times. We investigated the cross-resistance between Y12196 and boscalid by regressing the individual log10 EC50 values for Y12196 against the log10 EC50 values for boscalid and determining the Spearman rank correlation (ρ) (Lu et al. 2010).
Sequencing of the sdh B, sdh C, and sdh D genes
Genomic DNA from the 126 field-collected B. cinerea isolates (42 collected in 2018 and 84 collected in 2019) was extracted using Rapid Fungi Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). The primers used to amplify subunits B, C, and D are listed in Table 1. Each PCR reaction (50 μL) contained 25 μL of 2 × PrimeSTAR Max Premix (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), 2 μL genomic DNA (50 ng/μL), 1 μL of each primer (10 μM), and 21 μL of sterile water. The amplicons were purified from 1% agarose gels after electrophoresis using the SanPrep Column PCR Product Purification Kit (Shanghai, China), and the purified products were sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). The complete sequences of the sdh B, sdh C, and sdh D genes were compared with reference sequences (Gene ID 5,428,850, sdh B; 5,427,541, sdh C; and 5,440,404, sdh D) retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database using DNAstar v.6.0, to identity the mutations related to boscalid and Y12196 sensitivity.
Control efficacy of Y12196 against the B. cinerea H272R mutant
Preliminary results indicated that a mutation in the sdh B gene, H272R, conferred resistance to boscalid but not to Y12196. To more precisely determine how well the two SDHIs inhibited the B. cinerea H272R mutant on strawberry fruits and leaves, B05.10 (wild sensitive isolate lacking the H272R mutation), the isolate PB-4 (lacking the H272R mutation, a field isolate collected in 2018) and isolate ZB-4, isolate JDGZ-8 (possessing the H272R mutation, two field isolates collected in 2018 and 2019, respectively) were selected for efficacy assays, as described previously (Vitale et al. 2016). The isolates B05.10, PB-4, ZB-4, and JDGZ-8, had the EC50 values of 1.907, 2.512, 4.796, and 3.187 mg/L for Y12196 and had the EC50 values of 0.633, 0.661, 11.443, 19.383 mg/L for boscalid, respectively. Spore suspensions of each isolate were prepared (2 × 105 spores/mL). We tested the following concentrations of fungicides on fruits: 240 and 480 mg/L Y12196 or 250 and 500 mg/L boscalid. Before spray application, fruits were surface disinfected with 1% NaClO for 30 s, followed by three rinses in sterile water. Next, the disinfected fruits were sprayed with fungicides or sterile water (control). After air-drying, each fruit was inoculated with a 20 µL drop of the spore suspensions (2 × 105 spores/mL). The inoculated fruits were incubated in a growth chamber at 22 ± 3 °C with a photoperiod of 12 h and 90% relative humidity. Control assays were performed twice, with 15 fruits per treatment per assay. After 3 days, strawberries displaying symptoms of gray mold were counted as an indicator of control efficacy.
For assessing the control efficacy of Y12196 against the B. cinerea H272R mutant at a lower concentration, we tested the following concentrations of fungicides on leaves: 80 mg/L Y12196 or boscalid. After disinfection of the surface and air-drying, the leaves were wounded with a sterile needle and then were sprayed with fungicides or sterile water, followed by incubation of the spore suspensions (20 µL, with a density of 2 × 105 spores/mL). These control assays were also performed twice, using 10 leaves per treatment per assay. After cultivation for 3 days as described in the previous section, the lesions on the leaves were measured, and the average diameters of the lesions associated with each treatment were used to determine control efficacy as follows:
Control efficacy (%) = [(average lesion diameter on the control leaves—average lesion diameter on the fungicide-treated leaves)/average lesion diameter on the control leaves] × 100%.
Molecular docking simulations of Y12196 with SDH
To investigate the molecular interactions between Y12196 and the B. cinerea H272R mutant, we used homology models and model docking analyses to construct binding models for Y12196 with different SDH genotypes. Although the three-dimensional (3D) structure of B. cinerea SDH is currently unavailable, the crystal structures of SDH from Escherichia coli, porcine heart, chicken heart, and several parasites have previously been reported (Yankovskaya et al. 2003; Huang et al. 2005; Inaoka et al. 2015). Previous studies have suggested that the residues within the B, C, and D subunits might form binding pockets for SDHIs (Horsefield et al. 2006; Xiong et al. 2017). Here, we predicted the 3D structures of the SDH B, C, and D subunits based on their protein sequences (GenBank accession numbers XP_001548350.1, XP_001547075.1, and XP_001559774.1, respectively; Additional file 1: Figure S2a) using Discover Studio 3.5 (Accelrys Inc., 2013). The crystal structure of porcine heart SDH (PDB-code: 3ABV) was chosen as the modeling template using Pymol 2.5 (Sun et al. 2005). Y12196 and boscalid were added individually into the docking site in the homology-based model using the Maestro 10.2 Glide matrix (Zhu et al. 2014; Morris et al. 2015).
Statistical analysis
The data analyses were performed using SPSS v. 19.0 software. The EC50 values of each B. cinerea strain for Y12196 and boscalid were calculated by regressing the percent relative growth against the log10 values of the fungicide concentrations. The cross-resistance relationships between Y12196 and boscalid were evaluated based on the correlations between EC50 values transformed into log10 values. All the data were represented as the mean ± standard error (SE). To assess control efficacy, the diameters of the lesions on the leaves were measured for each isolate, and analyses of variance (ANOVA) followed by Fisher’s least significant difference test were performed to identify significant differences in mean diameter. We considered P < 0.05 statistically significant.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- ANOVA:
-
Analyses of variance
- BcSDHB − H272R :
-
Botrytis cinerea carrying the H272R mutation
- EC50 :
-
50% effective concentration
- G85A:
-
Amino acid at position 85 change from glycine to alanine
- H272L/R/Y:
-
Amino acid at position 272 change from histidine to leucine/arginine/tyrosine
- I93V:
-
Amino acid at position 93 change from isoleucine to valine
- M158V:
-
Amino acid at position 158 change methionine to valine
- N230I:
-
Amino acid at position 230 change from asparagine to isoleucine
- P225F/L/T:
-
Amino acid at position 225 change from proline to phenylalanine/leucine/threonine
- PDA:
-
Potato dextrose agar
- SC:
-
Suspension concentrate
- SDH B:
-
Succinate dehydrogenase subunit B
- SDHIs:
-
Succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors
- SE:
-
Standard error
- V168I:
-
Amino acid at position 168 change valine to isoleucine
- WG:
-
Water dispersible granule
- YBA:
-
Yeast peptone acetate
References
Adnan M, Hamada MS, Li GQ, Luo CX. Detection and molecular characterization of resistance to the dicarboximide and benzamide fungicides in Botrytis cinerea from tomato in Hubei Province. China Plant Dis. 2018;102(7):1299–306. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-17-1531-RE.
Amiri A, Heath SM, Peres NA. Resistance to fluopyram, fluxapyroxad, and penthiopyrad in Botrytis cinerea from strawberry. Plant Dis. 2014;98(4):532–9. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-13-0753-RE.
Amiri A, Zuniga AI, Peres NA. Mutations in the membrane-anchored sdh C subunit affect fitness and sensitivity to succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors in Botrytis cinerea populations from multiple hosts. Phytopathology. 2020;110(2):327–35. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-07-19-0240-R.
Avenot HF, Thomas A, Gitaitis RD, Langston DB Jr, Stevenson KL. Molecular characterization of boscalid-and penthiopyrad-resistant isolates of Didymella bryoniae and assessment of their sensitivity to fluopyram. Pest Manage Sci. 2012;68(4):645–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2311.
Avenot HF, Van D, Morgan DP, Moral J, Joosten M, Michailides TJ. Sensitivities of baseline isolates and boscalid-resistant mutants of Alternaria alternata from pistachio to fluopyram, penthiopyrad, and fluxapyroxad. Plant Dis. 2014;98(2):197–205. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-13-0459-RE.
Boff P, Kastelein P, Kraker JD, Gerlagh M, KöHl J. Epidemiology of grey mould in annual waiting-bed production of strawberry. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2001;107:615–24. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017932927503.
Chen W, Wei L, Zhao W, Wang B, Zheng H, Zhang P, Lou T, Duan Y, Hou Y, Zhou M, Chen C. Resistance risk assessment for a novel succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor pydiflumetofen in Fusarium asiaticum. Pest Manage Sci. 2021;77(1):538–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6053.
Cui K, He L, Li T, Mu W, Liu F. Development of boscalid resistance in Botrytis cinerea and an efficient strategy for resistance management. Plant Dis. 2021;105(4):1042–7. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-20-1009-RE.
Duan Y, Xiu Q, Li H, Li T, Wang J, Zhou M. Pharmacological characteristics and control efficacy of a novel sdhi fungicide pydiflumetofen against sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Dis. 2019;103(1):77–82. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0763-RE.
Fan F, Hamada MS, Li N, Li GQ, Luo CX. Multiple fungicide resistance in Botrytis cinerea from greenhouse strawberries in Hubei Province. China Plant Dis. 2017;101(4):601–6. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-16-1227-RE.
Fernández-Ortuño D, Chen F, Schnabel G. Resistance to pyraclostrobin and boscalid in Botrytis cinerea isolates from strawberry fields in the Carolinas. Plant Dis. 2012;96(8):1198–203. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-11-1049-RE.
He L, Cui K, Song Y, Li T, Liu N, Mu W, Liu F. Activity of the novel succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fungicide pydiflumetofen against SDHI-sensitive and SDHI-resistant isolates of Botrytis cinerea and efficacy against gray mold. Plant Dis. 2020;104(8):2168–73. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-19-2564-RE.
Horsefield R, Yankovskaya V, Sexton G, Whittingham W, Shiomi K, Omura S, et al. Structural and computational analysis of the quinone-binding site of complex II (succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase): a mechanism of electron transfer and proton conduction during ubiquinone reduction. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(11):7309–16. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M508173200.
Hua N. A review of SDHI fungicide dinotrimide. World Pestic. 2018;40(5):9–15. https://doi.org/10.16201/j.cnki.cn31-1827/tq.2018.05.02 (in Chinese).
Huang LS, Borders TM, Shen JT, Wang CJ, Berry EA. Crystallization of mitochondrial respiratory complex II from chicken heart: a membrane-protein complex diffracting to 2.0 A. Acta Cryst. 2005;61(Pt 4):380–7. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444905000181.
Inaoka DK, Shiba T, Sato D, Balogun EO, Sasaki T, Nagahama M, et al. Structural insights into the molecular design of flutolanil derivatives targeted for fumarate respiration of parasite mitochondria. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(7):15287–308. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160715287.
Ishii H, Miyamoto T, Ushio S, Kakishima M. Lack of cross-resistance to a novel succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor, fluopyram, in highly boscalid-resistant isolates of Corynrspora cassiicola and Podosphaera xanthii. Pest Manag Sci. 2011;67(4):474–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2092.
Kim YK, Xiao CL. Resistance to pyraclostrobin and boscalid in populations of Botrytis cinerea from stored apples in Washington State. Plant Dis. 2010;94(5):604–12. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-94-5-0604.
Laleve A, Gamet S, Walker AS, Debieu D, Toquin V, Fillinger S. Site-directed mutagenesis of the P225, N230 and H272 residues of succinate dehydrogenase subunit B from Botrytis cinerea highlights different roles in enzyme activity and inhibitor binding. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16(7):2253–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12282.
Leroux P, Gredt M, Leroch M, Walker AS. Exploring mechanisms of resistance to respiratory inhibitors in field strains of Botrytis cinerea, the causal agent of gray mold. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:6615–30. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00931-10.
Liao YM, Hu MH. Current situation, issue and suggestion of the strawberry industry in Zhejiang Province. J Zhengjiang Agric Sci. 2018;59:682–4. https://doi.org/10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20180502 (in Chinese).
Lin ZS, Zhao SF, Huang FYH, Wu JY, Wang HD, Zhang CQ. Resistance to boscalid in Botrytis cinerea in Zhejiang Province. Chin J Pestic Sci. 2018;20(6):729–34. https://doi.org/10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2018.0093.
Liu S, Che Z, Chen G. Multiple-fungicide resistance to carbendazim, diethofencarb, procymidone, and pyrimethanil in field isolates of Botrytis cinerea from tomato in Henan Province. China Crop Prot. 2016;84:56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.02.012.
Liu X, Wu Y, Cheng W, Zeng R, Xu HL, Gao SG, et al. Sensitivity and resistance mechanism to boscalid of Botrytis cinerea from strawberry in Shanghai. Chin J Pestic Sci. 2018;20(4):452–8. https://doi.org/10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2018.0058 (in Chinese).
Liu S, Fu L, Tan H, Jiang J, Che Z, Tian Y, Chen G. Resistance to boscalid in Botrytis cinerea from greenhouse-gown tomato. Plant Dis. 2021;105(3):628–35. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-20-1191-RE.
Lu XH, Zhu SS, Bi Y, Liu XL, Hao JJ. Baseline sensitivity and resistance-risk assessment of Phytophthora capsici to iprovalicarb. Phytopathology. 2010;100(11):1162–8. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-12-09-0351.
Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, et al. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem. 2015;19:1639–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14%3c1639::AID-JCC10%3e3.0.CO;2-B.
Mosbach A, Edel D, Farmer AD, Widdison S, Barchietto T, Dietrch RA, et al. Anilinopyrimidine resistance in Botrytis cinerea is linked to mitochondrial function. Front Microbiol. 2017;30(8):2361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02361.
Neves DL, Bradley CA. Baseline sensitivity of Cercospora sojina and Corynespora cassiicola to pydiflumetofen. Crop Prot. 2020;147:105461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105461.
Outwater CA, Proffer TJ, Rothwell NL, Peng JY, Dundin GW. Boscalid resistance in Blumeriella jaapii: distribution, effect on field efficacy, and molecular characterization. Plant Dis. 2019;103(6):1112–8. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-18-1555-RE.
Petrasch S, Knapp SJ, Kan JAL, Blanco-Ulate B. Grey mould of strawberry, a devastating disease caused by the ubiquitous necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Mol Plant Pathol. 2019;20(6):877–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12794.
Popko JT Jr, Sang H, Lee J, Yamada T, Hoshino Y, Jung G. Resistance of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa field isolates to succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fungicides. Plant Dis. 2018;102(12):2625–31. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-17-2025-RE.
Rupp S, Weber RW, Rieger D, Detzel P, Hahn M. Spread of Botrytis cinerea strains with multiple fungicide resistance in German horticulture. Front Microbiol. 2017;7:2075. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02075.
Ruprecht J, Yankovskaya V, Maklashina E, Iwata S, Cecchini G. Structure of Escherichia coli succinate:quinone oxidoreductase with an occupied and empty quinone-binding site. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(43):29836–46. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.010058.
Sang H, Witte A, Jacobs JL, Chang HX, Wang J, Roth MG, et al. Fluopyram sensitivity and functional characterization of SDH B in the Fusarium solani species complex causing soybean sudden death syndrome. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02335.
Shao WY, Zhao YF, Ma ZH. Advances in understanding fungicide resistance in Botrytis cinerea in China. Phytopathology. 2021;111(3):455–63. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-07-20-0313-IA.
Shi Z, Chen D, Chen TT, Wei G, Yin CY, Xu H, et al. In vivo analysis of two new fungicides in mung bean sprouts by solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2018;275:688–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.148.
Sierotzki H, Scalliet G. A review of current knowledge of resistance aspects for the next-generation succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fungicides. Phytopathology. 2013;103(9):880–7. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-01-13-0009-rvw.
Stammler G, Wolf A, Glaettli A, Klappach K. Respiration inhibitors: complex II. In: fungicide resistance in plant pathogens: principles and a guide to practical management.; Hideo I, Derek WH, editors. Japan: Springer; 2015, p. 105–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55642-8_8.
Sun F, Huo X, Zhai YJ, Wang AJ, Xu JX, Su D, et al. Crystal structure of mitochondrial respiratory membrane protein complex II. Cell. 2005;121:1043–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.025.
Sun HY, Wang HC, Chen Y, Li HX, Chen CJ, Zhou MG. Multiple resistance of Botrytis cinerea from vegetable crops to carbendazim, diethofencarb, procymidone, and pyrimethanil in China. Plant Dis. 2010;94(5):551–6. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-94-5-0551.
Toffolatti SL, Russo G, Bezza D, Bianco PA, Massi F, Marcianò D, et al. Characterization of fungicide sensitivity profiles of Botrytis cinerea populations sampled in Lombardy (Northern Italy) and implications for resistance management. Pest Manag Sci. 2020;76(6):2198–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5757.
Veloukas T, Leroch M, Hahn M, Karaoglanidis GS. Detection and molecular characterization of boscalid-resistant Botrytis cinerea isolates from strawberry. Plant Dis. 2011;95(10):1302–7. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-11-0317.
Veloukas T, Markoglou AN, Karaoglanidis GS. Differential effect of sdhB gene mutations on the sensitivity to SDHI fungicides in Botrytis cinerea. Plant Dis. 2013;97(1):118–22. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-12-0322-RE.
Vitale A, Panebianco A, Polizzi G. Baseline sensitivity and efficacy of fluopyram against Botrytis cinerea from table grape in Italy. Ann Appl Biol. 2016;169:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12277.
Wang Y, Duan Y, Wang J, Zhou M. A new point mutation in the iron-sulfur subunit of succinate dehydrogenase confers resistance to boscalid in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2015;16(7):653–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12222.
Wang MQ, Xue L, Zhao J, Dai H, Lei J. Strawberry production and trade in the world. China Fruits. 2021;02:104–8. https://doi.org/10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2021.02.025 (in Chinese).
Weber RWS, Hahn M. Grey mould disease of strawberry in Northern Germany causal agents, fungicide resistance and management strategies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103(4):1589–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-09590-1.
Wu JY, Sun YN, Zhou XJ, Zhang CQ. A New Mutation Genotype of K218T in Myosin-5 Confers Resistance to Phenamacril in Rice Bakanae Disease in the Field. Plant Dis. 2020;104(4):1151–7. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-19-1031-RE.
Xiong L, Zhu XL, Shen YQ, Wishwajith WKWM, Li K, Yang GF. Discovery of N-benzoxazol-5-yl-pyrazole-4- carboxamides as nanomolar SQR inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;95:424–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.03.060.
Xiong L, Li H, Jiang LN, Ge JM, Yang WC, Zhu XL, et al. Structure-based discovery of potential fungicides as succinate ubiquinone oxidoreductase inhibitors. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65(5):1021–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05134.
Yankovskaya V, Horsefield R, Törnroth S, Luna-Chavez C, Miyoshi H, Léger C, et al. Architecture of succinate dehydrogenase and reactive oxygen species generation. Science. 2003;299(5607):700–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079605.
Yin WX, Adnan M, Shang Y, Lin Y, Luo CX. Sensitivity of Botrytis cinerea from nectarine/cherry in China to six fungicides and characterization of resistant isolates. Plant Dis. 2018;102(12):2578–85. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-18-0244-RE.
Zhang CQ, Liu YH, Zhu GN. Detection and characterization of benzimidazole resistance of Botrytis cinerea in greenhouse vegetables. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2010;126:509–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9557-5.
Zheng AP, Zhou LZ, Kong FF, Wang ZY, Zhang H. Detection of the resistance of Botrytis cinerea on grape plants in Penglai of Shandong to seven fungicides. Plant Prot. 2019;45(1):164–9. https://doi.org/10.16688/j.zwbh.2018140 (in Chinese).
Zhu XL, Xiong L, Li H, Song XY, Liu JJ, Yang GF. Computational and experimental insight into the molecular mechanism of carboxamide inhibitors of succinate-ubquinone oxidoreductase. Chem Med Chem. 2014;9(7):1512–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201300456.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This research was funded by the Key Important Program of China National Tobacco Corporation (110202101048(LS-08)), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31801779), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (ZJ2021121), and the Research Training Project for College Student (2021KX0006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JW, FW, and CZ designed the experiments; JW, HW, and CZ wrote the manuscript; JW, HM, and YS carried out the experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1. Figure. S1.
Chemical structures of the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitorsboscalid and Y12196. Figure. S2. Homology-based three-dimensional modeling of Botrytis cinerea SDH.
Additional file 2. Table S1.
Sensitivity of the 42 Botrytis cinerea H272R mutants collected in 2019 to Y12196 and boscalid.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, J., Mao, H., Sun, Y. et al. Treatment with succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor Y12196 protects strawberries from boscalid-resistant Botrytis cinerea with the H272R mutation in SDH B. Phytopathol Res 5, 22 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42483-023-00173-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42483-023-00173-1
Keywords
- Botrytis cinerea
- Y12196
- Boscalid resistance
- H272R mutant
- Binding mode