Biocontrol and molecular characterization of Bacillus velezensis D against tobacco bacterial wilt
Phytopathology Research volume 5, Article number: 50 (2023)
Natural rhizosphere bacteria has the potential to act as an alternative of chemical pesticides for sustainable agriculture. In the current study, tobacco rhizosphere Bacillus velezensis D exhibited great antibacterial effect against Ralstonia solanacearum, and significantly enhanced the tobacco resistance against bacterial wilt in pot experiments. Then Bacillus velezensis D was labeled with gfp marker and found to stably colonize in tobacco root, the colonization density of strain D in root still remained 5.33 × 104 CFU/gat 30 days post-inoculation. Subsequently, field trials for two years (2021–2022) showed the control effects of the strain D on the tobacco bacterial wilt were 12.26% and 36.37%, respectively, indicating the application of B. velezensis D could improve plant resistance to R.solanacearum. In order to further study the antibacterial activities of strain D, effects of the crude extracts on the swimming ability, cell viability and the morphology of R. solanacearum were analyzed. The results showed that the crude extracts reduced the motility of R. solanacearum, and caused cell wall rupture and cell death. Furthermore, MALDI-TOF-MS and HPLC-QTOF-MS analysis indicated that lipopeptides (fengycin and iturin) and polyketides (bacillaene) were detected in the crude extracts of strain D. Based on these findings, we speculated that Bacillus velezensis D firstly colonized in tobacco root, then produced antibacterial substances at ecological sites to exert antagonistic effects, inhibiting motility traits of R. solanacearum and damaging the cell well. Hence, Bacillus velezensis D could be used as a potential biological control agents against tobacco bacterial wilt.
Tobacco bacterial wilt, a major devastating disease, is caused by Ralstonia solanacearum and lead to serious economic losses worldwide (Peeters et al. 2013). Studies have shown that during the infection process, R. solanacearum could produce multiple virulence factors such as extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) and cell wall degrading enzymes (CWDE), which eventually lead to typical wilting symptoms in host plants (Milling et al. 2011; Genin and Denny 2012). In addition, other factors like motility and biofilm formation ability were also essential for the virulence by influencing the colonization and infection behavior of R. solanacearum (Yao and Allen 2007).
At present, the bacterial wilt was mainly controlled by chemical method. However, continuous application of chemical agents is easy to cause the generation of fungicide-resistant pathogens and environmental pollution. In recent years, using the effective biocontrol strains has become the hotspot and proved to be a promising strategy for the management of plant diseases (Spadaro and Gullino 2004). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) has been widely studied due to its potential to exert plant growth promotion and enhance its tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses, and are found in the rhizosphere, root surface as well as inside the root tissues. Various biocontrol agents developed from PGPR, such as Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Streptomyces spp., and Paenibacillus spp., played the important roles in managing the Ralstonia solanacearum (Ramesh et al. 2009; Xue et al. 2009; Gao et al. 2013; Abo-Elyousr et al. 2019). For example, the B. cereus BC1AW and P. putida PP3WT strains, obtained from the rhizosphere of healthy plants, were able to reduce the severity of bacterial wilt in tomato genotypes King Kong 2, and increase the shoot dry weight of plants as well (Kurabachew and Wydra 2013). And the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by P. fluorescens WR-1 showed an inhibitory effect against the tomato wilt pathogen R. solanacearum (Raza et al. 2016a, b). Among them, Bacillus species has attracted more attention due to its spores with strong stress resistance, which is beneficial for the biocontrol stability of the Bacillus sp (Chowdhury et al. 2015; Fan et al. 2018; Ye et al. 2020).
Bacillus spp., typical plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria, were reported to effectively enhance plant growth and control soil-borne diseases by producing antimicrobial substances and activating an induced systemic resistance (Erlacher et al. 2014; Chowdhury et al. 2015; Fan et al. 2018; Boka et al. 2019). For instance, B. velezensis SQR9, isolated from the rhizosphere of cucumber, was able to induce plant systemic resistance by producing antibiotics (Wu et al. 2018). Bacillus velezensis GUMT319, isolated from healthy tobacco rhizosphere, has high biocontrol effects on tobacco black shank through producing enzymes with biocontrol activity and successfully colonizing tobacco roots (Yu et al. 2015; Ding et al. 2021). At present, most Bacillus species have been developed into commercial products,such as the microbial pesticide ‘Baikang’ by the Bacillus subtilis B908, which was jointly developed by Yunnan Agricultural University and China Agricultural University, and control the rice sheath blight, tobacco black shank and so on (Zhang et al. 2006). The Bacillus velezensis FZB42 has been registered and industrialized by the company ABiTEP GmbH of Germany (Chen et al. 2007).
Recently, biocontrol is widely used for prevention and control the tobacco bacterial wilt by using beneficial mircobes, like bacteria, fungi and bacteriophages. And the antibacterial mechanisms of these beneficial microbes were mainly including secretion of antibacterial substances, competition with bacteria for niche and nutrients, and induced resistance. In this study, the Bacillus velezensis D was isolated from the rhizosphere soil of healthy tobacco in the Tongzi tobacco field with a high incidence of tobacco bacterial wilt, in the Gui zhou Province of China, and exhibited a strong antibacterial effect on R. solanacearum. However, it was unclear how the Bacillus velezensis D affect the growth and infection characteristics of R. solanacearum. In order to clarify the biocontrol mechanism, its ability to colonize tobacco, biocontrol efficacy on tobacco bacterial wilt in pot and field experiments as well as the effects on the growth and infection characteristics of R. solanacearum were investigated. This work provides a theoretical basis for the use of D strain as a replacement for bactericide and supplements.
Antibacterial activity of rhizosphere bacteria against R. solanacearum
A total of 36 rhizosphere bacteria were isolated and obtained from fifteen rhizosphere soil samples. Preliminary screening showed that eight strains displayed antagonistic activities against R. solanacearum (Fig. 1a). Among them, the positive control Bacillus velezensis FZB42 produced the largest zone of inhibition (20.40 mm), followed by the D (20.00 mm), which was not significantly different from that of the FZB42. While OR1-39 inhibited the pathogen at a lower level (7.00 mm) (Fig. 1b). The above results indicated that the strain D exhibited better antibacterial effect against R. solanacearum.
To identify strain D, the 16S rDNA and gyrB genes of D were amplified and sequenced. Phylogenetic tree analysis based on 16S rDNA indicated that strain D was a member of Bacillus sp (Fig. 1c). And the gyrB sequences amplified from strain D (GenBank Accession ID: OP785086) had a match to the reference strain Bacillus velezensis Y3 (GenBank Accession ID: MW879356) (Fig. 1d). Thus, taking into account the 16S rDNA and gyrB gene sequences, strain D was identified as a Bacillus velezensis strain.
Colonization analyses of Bacillus velezensis D in tobacco and rhizosphere soil
To further investigate the colonization of B. velezensis D in tobacco, we monitored the populations of strain D colonized on the root, stem, and leaf of tobacco. After 14 days post-inoculation, green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled B. velezensis strain D were investigated using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The strain D mainly colonized in clusters or singlets of the root elongation zone (Fig. 2a), and relatively fewer GFP-labeled D cells were detected in stem and leaf tissues. And this was further confirmed by quantitative measurement of bacterial population. The results showed that the D cell counts in the tobacco roots peaked at approximately 8.27 × 104 CFU/g at 20th day post-irrigation, and it remained at a range of 5.33 × 104 CFU/g at 30th day (Fig. 2b). Whereas, the D cell counts in the stems and leaves were relatively less than that of roots, the population density of the strain D in tobacco stems and leaves was only 2.10 × 104 CFU/g and 8.00 × 102 CFU/g until 30 days post-inoculation (Additional file 1: Figure S1).
Biological control of Bacillus velezensis D against tobacco bacterial wilt
Evaluation of Bacillus velezensis D against tobacco bacterial wilt in pot experiments
The biocontrol efficacy of B. velezensis D against tobacco bacterial wilt were evaluated by pot experiments. Fourteen days after inoculation of R. solanacearum, most of bottom leaves in control plants completely withered seriously. However, only small amounts of bottom leaves in B. velezensis D and chemical groups turned yellow and withered (Fig. 3a). The disease severities were also investigated. Compared with control, the plants in B. velezensis D and chemical groups exhibited less severe disease symptoms, with disease index of 30.33 and 12.33 respectively (Fig. 3b). And the control efficiency of B. velezensis D and chemical bactericide reached to 57.47% and 82.71% (Fig. 3c). These results indicated that the strain D had potential to control tobacco bacterial wilt.
To further investigate the effectiveness of the B. velezensis D against tobacco bacterial wilt, the biomass of R. solanacearum in soil after treatment with strain D were measured using RT-qPCR method. Firstly, the relationship of log (R. solanacearum DNA content) and Ct value was obtained as follows: y = − 2.526× + 20.32 (R2 = 0.9966), there was a negative correlation between the Ct value and the log value of R. solanacearum DNA quantity (Additional file 1: Figure S2). On this basis, the DNA contents of the R. solanacearum in tobacco rhizosphere soil were calculated, the DNA of R. solanacearum in rhizosphere soil treated with D and chemical bactericide were 1.01 ng/g and 0.42 ng/g, respectively, which were significantly lower than control (3.32 ng/g) (Fig. 3d). The results indicated that pre-treatment with D could retard the growth of R. solanacearum in rhizosphere soil.
Evaluation of Bacillus velezensis D against tobacco bacterial wilt in field trials
Subsequently, the efficacy of B. velezensis D against the tobacco bacterial wilt in the field was conducted for two consecutive years (2021–2022). Field experiment results showed that B. velezensis D effectively controlled tobacco bacterial wilt. Disease index of strain D-treated groups was significantly lower than control (Table 1). In 2021 year, the disease index of D and chemical agent (chloruric copper sulfate wettable powder)-treated groups were 42.81 and 39.57, which were lower than control. And the control efficiency of strains D and chemical agent reached to 12.26% and 18.90%, respectively (Table 1). In 2022 year, the disease index of D and chemical agent-treated groups was 15.85 and 13.73, while the disease index of control was 24.91. Control efficiency of strains D and chemical agent were 36.37% and 44.88%, respectively (Table 1). The results suggested that the B. velezensis strian D could control tobacco bacterial wilt effectively.
Crude extracts of strain D inhibited motility of R. solanacearum
To further investigate the effects of strain D against R. solanacearum, the antibacterial activities of crude extracts were detected. The crude extracts of stain D showed inhibitory activity against R. solanacearum (Fig. 4a). Subsequently, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of crude extracts was evaluated, and was determined as 1200 μg/mL (Additional file 1: Figure S3). On this basis, the effects of 150 μg/mL (1/8 MIC) crude extracts on the motility of R. solanacearum were then measured. The 1/8 MIC crude extracts effectively inhibited the motility of R. solanacearum. The diameter of R. solanacearum (1.85 cm) treated with the crude extracts was significantly reduced by 2.65 times than that of control group (4.92 cm), and the inhibitory efficiency reached 62.40% (Fig. 4b). Moreover, the expression levels of cheA, cheW, fliA, and lecM genes associated with bacterial motility were also analyzed. The results of qRT-PCR analysis showed that all four genes in R. solanacearum were down-regulated in response to crude extracts of strain D, especially for two genes (cheA and cheW) (Fig. 4c).
Crude extracts caused morphological abnormalities in R. solanacearum cells
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis revealed that crude extracts of strain D caused morphological changes in R. solanacearum cells, when compared to the untreated control. The cells in control samples were in rod shape, whereas the crude extracts-treated R. solanacearum cells were largely disrupted and abnormal, such as swelling, and even rupturing of the cell wall (Fig. 5a). Accordingly, the conductivity of R. solanacearum cells gradually increased from 0 to 6 h in response to crude extracts, and the conductivity was 16.06 ms/cm, which increased by 1.6 times compared with that of the R. solanacearum at 0 h (Fig. 5b). According to the above results, we speculated that crude extracts of the strain D could cause R. solanacearum cytoplasmic exosmosis by destroying the cell wall.
Crude extracts caused cell death of R. solanacearum
SYTO9 can penetrate the intact cell membrane and bind to nucleic acids to yield bright green fluorescence, while PI entered cells with damaged membranes and showed red fluorescence. In the study, the R. solanacearum cells in control group (sterile water) had complete cell membrane, and emitted green fluorescence (Fig. 6a), and the survival rate was 100%. In contrast, part of the crude extracts-treated R. solanacearum cells showed red fluorescence (Fig. 6b), and the survival rate was significantly reduced to 61.33% (Fig. 6c). These results confirmed that the crude extracts of B. velezensis D could cause cell death in R. solanacearum.
Identification of lipopeptides and polyketides compounds in the crude extracts of stain D
To further clarify the antibacterial substances existing in the crude extracts of stain D. The MALDI-TOF-MS and UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS analysis were used to identify the lipopeptide compounds and polyketides, respectively. Two kinds of lipopeptides including fengycin A and iturin families were produced by strain D. The molecular mass of iturin in the range m/z 1030.4–1059.4 was similar to previous published molecular mass (De et al. 2018), compound at m/z 1030.68 and 1043.58 represented a H adduct of iturin, and the mass spectra of m/z 1051.56 and 1065.56 represented Na adducts of iturin, respectively (Fig. 7a). While the molecular mass of fengycin A was in the range of m/z 1421.8–1449.8 representing a H adducts of C13 ~ C15 fengycin A, respectively (Fig. 7b), the mass agreed with previous studies (Ghoreishi et al. 2023; Liao et al. 2016). Besides the iturin and fengycin A, bacillaene (m/z value of 583) which belongs to polyketides was also detected in the crude extracts (Fig. 7c).
Bacillus strains have been confirmed to effectively control tobacco bacterial wilt disease (Liu et al. 2013; Yuan et al. 2014). In this study, the B. velezensis strain D was isolated from the rhizosphere of healthy tobacco in the Tongzi field with a high incidence of tobacco bacterial wilt, in the Guizhou Province of China. The control efficiency of D against tobacco bacterial wilt was greater than 50% in pot experiments, which is similar to that by using 20% thiodiazole copper against R. solanacearum (56.39%) (Inoue et al. 2022), meanwhile, the application of B. velezensis D could improve plant resistance to R. solanacearum in field trials. Hence, B. velezensis D has the potential to act as a biological control agent (BCA) for tobacco bacterial wilt in Guizhou tobacco-growing areas.
A large number of studies have confirmed that Bacillus could colonize in plant rhizosphere soil, roots, and above-ground tissues, and the colonization ability of Bacillus has become an important factor to exert its biological control function (Jin et al. 2019). In this study, the colonization dynamics of the B. velezensis D in tobacco roots was studied, and the B. velezensis D was detected in tobacco roots at the sixth day after irrigation. The quantity of D cells in tobacco roots retained to 5.33 × 104 CFU/g until the 30th day after inoculation, indicating that B. velezensis D could rapidly colonize the tobacco roots (Yunyan87). The stable colonization of B. velezensis D was due to the its good natural relationship with tobacco. Compared to other heterologous biocontrol bacteria, B. velezensis D was more likely to preempt advantageous ecological sites for rapidly colonization. In recent years, evaluating the colonization ability and its dynamics of biocontrol bacteria has become an important reference for screening and developing biocontrol Bacillus (Ying et al. 2010). Liu et al. found that colonization amount of Bacillus PTS in tomato rhizosphere soil was 20 CFU/g 30 days after irrigation root inoculation (Liu et al. 2014), however, Bacillus subtilis B2-GFP was found to be colonize the tobacco (LY1306) rhizosphere soil with 2.71 × 106 CFU/g 70 days after irrigation root inoculation (Lei et al. 2022). In the study, the quantity of B. velezensis D in tobacco (Yunyan87) roots were 5.33 × 104 CFU/g until the 30th day after inoculation. Comparative analysis showed that different species of Bacillus had different rhizosphere colonization abilities in different varieties of the same plant or different plants, this difference may be due to different types and contents, which were produced by plant root, affected the colonization ability of the biocontrol strain in rhizosphere soil.
Swimming motility allows the R. solanacearum to efficiently invade and colonize host plants (Tans-Kersten et al. 2001, 2004), and eventually contribute to virulence in the early stages of R. solanacearum invasion (Tans-Kersten et al. 2004). It was reported that the fliC deletion mutant from R. solanacearum significantly reduced the pathogenicity to tomato using the irrigation inoculation method (Tans-Kersten et al. 2004), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR-9 significantly inhibited the motility traits, biofilm formation and tomato root colonization by R. solanacearum (Raza et al. 2016a), furtherly, Yang found that the motility of R. solanacearum treated with 7,8-dithydroxycoumarin at 50 mg/L final concentration was only 0.29 times that of the control group (Yang et al. 2016). However, there were relatively fewer reports about the effects of Bacillus sp. on the virulence of R. solanacearum virulence. In this study, the crude extracts of strain D at 150 μg/mL final concentration effectively inhibited the motility of R. solanacearum, and expression levels of four genes related to motility of R. solanacearum were all significantly down-regulated. These above results might suggest that the crude extracts can arrest the colonization ability of R. solanacearum in tobacco roots by restricting the movement of R. solanacearum invading plant roots.
Further study of the mechanism of action of crude extracts showed that it showed strong antibacterial activity against R. solanacearum by altering the integrity of the cell wall and permeability of cell membrane, leading to cell death of R. solanacearum. Additionally, lipopeptides and polyketides have been confirmed as an important mode of action for Bacillus (Mnif and Ghribi 2015). In the present study, fengycin A, iturin and bacillaene were detected in the crude extracts of strain D. Previous studies have demonstrated that iturins displayed strong antifungal activities against a broad range of microorganisms but had limited antibacterial activity (Ambrico and Trupo 2017; Calvo et al. 2019), while fengycin was considered specific against filamentous fungi. However, in recent years, some researchers confirmed that fengycins showed great antibacterial activity against R. solanacearum which cause bacterial wilt of banana and tomato plants (Villegas-Escobar et al. 2018; Chen et al. 2019). Moreover, bacillaene plays important roles in microbial biofilm formation (Li et al. 2021) and microbial competition for finite resources (Ghoul and Mitri 2016), it inhibited bacterial growth by inhibiting prokaryotic protein synthesis, and was reported to have better antagonistic effects on the pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli (Patel et al. 1995), E. faecium (Huan et al. 2019), and Erwinia amylovora (Chen et al. 2009). Based on the above findings, we speculated that the antibacterial activity of the crude extracts could be due to the lipopeptide compounds and bacillaene produced by Bacillus velezensis D.
In summary, our study showed that one of the antibacterial mechanisms of Bacillus velezensis D was that the strain D could successfully colonize in tobacco root and rhizosphere, then produced lipopeptide compounds and polyketides at ecological sites to exert antagonistic effects, inhibiting of motility traits of R. solanacearum and damaging the cell wall and membrane. Hence, B. velezensis D has the potential to act as BCA against tobacco bacterial wilt.
Microorganism strains and growth conditions
A total of 15 soil samples were collected from the rhizosphere of healthy tobacco during the June–July 2020 in the Tongzi tobacco field (28° 133 N and 106° 825 E) with a high incidence of tobacco bacterial wilt, in Guizhou Province of China. And the 36 rhizosphere bacteria were isolated from fifteen samples by the gradient dilution coating method (Shi and Sun 2017).
The Ralstonia solanacearum belonging to the physiological races 1, and the Bacillus velezensis FZB42 were both provided by Key Laboratory of Crop Biology of Anhui Province, Anhui Agricultural University. The Ralstonia solanacearum was maintained on liquid medium for growth of Ralstonia solanacearum (CPG) (acid hydrolyzed casein 1 g/L, peptone 20 g/L, glucose 5 g/L) at 30°C, while the strain FZB42 and rhizosphere bacteria were grown at 30°C in Luria–Bertani (LB) liquid medium (yeast extract 5 g/L; NaCl 10 g/L; tyrptone 10 g/L).
Antagonism activity assay
Antagonistic activities of rhizobacteria strains and their lipopeptides against R. solanacearum were analyzed through the oxford cup method. Briefly, R. solanacearum was cultured in CPG liquid medium at 30°C for 48 h, then 5 mL R. solanacearum suspensions (1 × 108 CFU/mL) was mixed with 1 L 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) medium (peptone 10 g/L, glucose 5 g/L, acid hydrolyzed casein 1 g/L, 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride 10 g/L, agar 15 g/L), poured in plates and allowed to solidify. Sterile oxford cups (0.6 cm) impregnated with 150 μL bacterial suspensions of strain D (1 × 108 CFU/mL) or crude extracts solution (150 μg/mL) were placed on the surface of solid medium. Sterile LB medium, and FZB42 were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. The diameters of inhibition zones were measured after incubating at 30°C for 48 h. The experiment was conducted with three replications.
Phylogenetic analysis of the antagonistic strain
Bacterial DNA was extracted with the Ezup column genomic DNA extract kit (Hunan Accurate Biology). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) (forward) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACPGACTT-3′) (reverse). The gyrB gene was amplified with the primers UP-1 (5′-GAAGTCATCATGACCPGTTCTGCAYGCNGGNGGNAARTTYGA-3′) and UP-2 (5′- AGCAGGGTACPGGATGTGCPGAGCCRTCNACRTCNGCRTCNGTCAT-3′) (Xie et al. 2020). The PCR products were sequenced and blasted against the NCBI database. A phylogenetic tree was established with Mega 7.0 software using the Neighbor-joining method.
GFP labeling of antagonistic rhizobacteria
The pAD43-25 with gfp marker was transformed into the competent cells of the antagonistic rhizobacteria by electroporation as previously described (Wang et al. 2020). The competent cells (100 mL) were completely mixed with 50 ng pAD43-25 plasmid DNA and electroporated at 2.5 kV (2.5–5 ms) using an electroporation apparatus (MicroPulser, Bio-Rad) (Hao and Chen 2017). Subsequently, 100 μL cell suspensions were incubated in 900 μL LB medium and cultured at 37°C for 5 h with shaking at 100 rpm. Finally, the mixture (100 μL) was spread on LB plates containing 5 μg/mL chloramphenicol at 37°C for 24 h. The GFP-labeled cells were selected on the antibiotic plates for five generations, and further confirmed with laser confocal microscope (OlympusBX53, Japan).
Colonization of the Bacillus velezensis D assay
The tobacco seeds (Yunyan 87) were grown in the seedling-raising pot and cultured at 28°C under a 14/10 h light/dark photoperiod and 75% relative humidity. Six-week-old tobacco seedlings were transplanted into the nutrient pots (16 cm × 17.5 cm) filled with the mixture of soil and vermiculite (vsoil: vvermiculite = 2:1). The GFP-labeled D suspensions (1 × 108 CFU/mL) were added to the roots of 55-day-old tobacco (50 mL per plant) and sterile water were used as control. After inoculation for 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25, and 30 days, the roots, stems and leaves were collected, cut into pieces, and homogenized in sterile water (Sun et al. 2019). The homogenates were diluted gradiently and spread on LB plates containing 5 μg/mL chloramphenicol. Colony numbers were counted after incubating at 30°C for 36 h. Each treatment contained 81 plants.
After inoculation for 14 days, roots, stems and leaves tissues were collected and cut into 1 cm in length and observed with laser confocal microscopy (OlympusBX53, Japan). The experiment was repeated three times.
Biocontrol assays of the Bacillus velezensis D
The control efficiency of D against tobacco bacterial wilt was evaluated using plot experiments and field trials. In the plot experiments, the suspensions of D (1 × 108 CFU/mL) were applied to the roots of 55-day-old tobacco by soil drenching (50 mL per plant). Sterile water and chemical bactericide (52% chloruric copper sulfate wettable powder) were used as the negative and positive controls, respectively. Two days after treatment with strain D and chemical bactericide, R. solanacearum cell suspensions (1 × 108 CFU/mL) were added to the tobacco root (15 mL per plant). Then the plants were cultured in glasshouse at 28°C and relative humidity 70%. After 14 days post-infection (dpi), the disease severity was recorded with a scoring range of 0–9 (National Standard of the People's Republic of China GB/T23222-2008). Each treatment consisted of three replicates, and ten plants were in per replicate.
On the basis of the pot experiment, the field control effects of strain D against R. solanacearum were carried out in tobacco field with a high incidence of tobacco bacterial wilt for two consecutive years in the Tongzi, in Guizhou Province of China. When tobacco seedings were transplanted, the strain D cell suspensions (1 × 108 CFU/mL) were applied to the tobacco root (50 mL per plant). Sterile water and chemical bactericide (52% chloruric copper sulfate wettable powder) were used as the negative and positive controls, respectively. Each treatment was conducted with three replications and contained 90 plants. Then the disease severity of the tobacco bacterial wilt in different groups were investigated in the harvest period, Disease index and biocontrol efficacy were calculated according to the formulas below.
where di = the grade of disease severity, II = the number of plants at different grades of disease, L = the number of all investigated plants, N = the highest grade of disease severity, I0 = the disease index of control, and II = the disease index of treatment groups.
Quantitative analysis of R. solanacearum in tobacco rhizosphere soil
To further investigate the biocontrol activity of B. velezensis D on tobacco plants, the population of R. solanacearum was detected in tobacco rhizosphere soil treated with D suspensions in the plot experiments. Sterile water and chemical bactericide (52% Chloruric copper sulfate wettable powder) were used as the negative and positive controls. Fourteen days after the challenge with R. solanacearum, soil DNAs of different groups were extracted by soil DNA extraction kit (TianGen, Beijing, China), and qRT-PCR was used to detect R. solanacearum in tobacco rhizosphere soil (Umesha and Avinash 2015). Each PCR tube contained 10 μL AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix, 1 μL 25 ng cDNA, 8 μL water, and 1 μL primer (UP-1 (5′-GAACPGCCAACPGGTGCPGAACT-3′) and UP-2 (5′- GGCPGGCCTTCAGGGAGGTC-3′). The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: 30 s at 95°C, 40 cycles for 10 s at 94°C, and 30 s at 60°C, after 95°C for 15 s,60 s at 60°C, last 95°C for 15 s. Each sample was replicated three times.
RT-qPCR amplification was performed on tenfold gradient dilutions of R. solanacearum DNA with primers, and the genomic DNA standard curve equation, of which the R. solanacearum DNA quantity was log and the Ct value was the y-axis, the formula was obtained.
Preparation of crude extracts of stain D
Strain D was grown in the landy medium at 30°C and 200 rpm on a shaker for 36 h, then the crude extracts in fermentation liquid was prepared by hydrochloric acid precipitation (Ding et al. 2017). The extracts were concentrated and vacuum freeze dried, and the dried material was dissolved in sterile water (Chen et al.2019; Gao and Zhao 2022).
Swimming motility of the R. solanacearum assay
R. solanacearum suspensions (OD600 = 0.1) were cultured with crude extracts of stain D at final concentration 1200, 600, 300, 150, 75, and 37.5 μg/mL respectively, in CPG liquid medium by shaking at 30℃ for 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). Then Plates containing a semisolid medium (peptone 20 g/L, glucose 5 g/L, acid hydrolyzed casein 1 g/L, agar 3 g/L) supplemented with 1/8MIC crude extracts (150 μg/mL) were prepared. R. solanacearum suspensions (OD600 = 1.0), collected from CPG liquid culture, were washed twice with sterile water at 6000 r/min for 5 min and resuspended in sterile water. An aliquot of 5 μL cell suspensions were drop-inoculated at the center of semisolid medium plates. Sterile water was used as control. The petri dish was incubated at 30℃, and colony diameters on each plate were observed and measured after 12 h. Each sample was replicated three times.
Moreover, R. solanacearum suspensions (OD600 = 1.0) was cultured with 150 μg/mL crude extracts of stain D in CPG liquid medium by shaking at 30℃ for 12 h, the cells were collected to extract total RNA using the Trizol reagent (Sangon, Shanghai, China). Transcriptional expression levels of genes related to motility were analyzed by qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR was performed with AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix on an ABI 7300 Real-Time System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The primers used were listed in Additional file 2: Table S1. Each sample was replicated three times.
Effects of crude extracts on the morphology of R. solanacearum
The effect of crude extracts on morphological changes of R. solanacearum was observed by scanning electron microscope. The cell suspensions of R. solanacearum (OD600 = 1.0) were incubated with 150 μg/mL crude extracts in CPG medium by shaking at 30°C for 12 h. Bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation at 6000 r/min for 5 min, and then washed, fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde overnight. The suspensions were dehydrated with ethanol and acetone. The samples were analyzed with a scanning electron microscope (HITACHI S-4800, Japan). The cell suspensions of R. solanacearum (OD600 = 1.0) without the crude extracts were used as control.
The conductivity of the R. solanacearum assay
The conductivity of the R. solanacearum treated with the crude extracts was analyzed following previously described methods (Bandian et al. 2022; Mahboubi and Kazempour 2011). The cell suspensions of R. solanacearum (OD600 = 1.0) were incubated with 150 μg/mL crude extracts at 30°C for 6 h. Sterile water was used as control. And the conductivity was detected every hour. Three parallel experiments were conducted.
Live/dead cell viability assay
Cell suspensions of R. solanacearum (OD600 = 1.0) were incubated with 150 μg/mL crude extracts in CPG medium by shaking under 30°C for 12 h, then the cell viability of R. solanacearum was detected by live/dead BacLight bacterial viability Kit l13152 (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, America). An aliquot of 1 mL cell suspensions was centrifugated, washed and resuspended in 1 mL 0.85% NaCl solution, and 10 μL propidium iodide (PI, excitation wavelength/emission wavelength 490 nm/635 nm) and SYTO9 (excitation wavelength / emission wavelength 480 nm/500 nm) were added to the cell suspensions to incubate at 25℃ for 15 min in the dark. Sterile water was used as a control. Each group contained three replicates, and samples were observed with a laser confocal microscope (OlympusBX53, Japan). Survival rates of R. solanacearum cells were calculated according to the formulas below.
Identification of the lipopeptides and polyketides in crude extracts of stain D
Lipopeptides were analyzed using MALDI-TOF-MS at Shanghai Applied Protein Technology Co. Ltd. And data was acquired in positive reflector mode from 800 to 4000 m/z. Polyketides were identified with UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS analysis according to the previous study (Liang et al. 2018).
Statistical data analyses were conducted using the Data processing system (DPS) software. Differences between different groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by LSD post hoc test at a significance level of P = 0.05.
Availability of data and materials
- R. solanacearum :
Real time quantitative PCR
The minimum inhibitory concentration
Abo-Elyousr KAM, Hadeel MMKB, Hashem M, Alamri SAM, Mostafa YS. Biological control of the tomato wilt caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis using formulated plant growth-promoting bacteria. Egypt J Biol Pest Control. 2019;29:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-019-0152-6.
Ambrico A, Trupo M. Efficacy of cell free supernatant from Bacillus subtilis ET-1, an Iturin A producer strain, on biocontrol of green and gray mold. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2017;134:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.08.001.
Bandian L, Moghaddam M, Bahreini M, Vatankhah E. Antibacterial characteristics and mechanisms of some herbal extracts and e-polylysine against two spoilage bacterial. Food Biosci. 2022;50:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2022.102060.
Boka B, Manczinger L, Kocsube S, Shine K, Alharbi NS, Khaled JM, et al. Genome analysis of a Bacillus subtilis strain reveals genetic mutations determining biocontrol properties(Article). World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;35:52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-019-2625-x.
Calvo H, Mendiara I, Arias E, Blanco D, Venturini ME. The role of iturin A from B. amyloliquefaciens BUZ-14 in the inhibition of the most common postharvest fruit rots. Food Microbiol. 2019;82:62–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.01.010.
Chen XH, Koumoutsi A, Scholz R, Eisenreich A, Schneider K, Heinemeyer I, et al. Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:1007–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1325. (in Chinese).
Chen XH, et al. Difficidin and Bacilysin produced by plant-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens are efficient in controlling fire blight disease. J Biotechnol. 2009;140:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.10.015.
Chen MC, Wang JP, Zhu YJ, Liu B, Yang WJ, Ruan CQ. Antibacterial activity against Ralstonia solanacearum of the lipopeptides secreted from the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FJAT-2349. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;126:1519–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14213.
Chowdhury SP, Hartmann A, Gao X, Borriss R. Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42—a review. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:780. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00780.
De S, et al. Simultaneous quantification of lipopeptide isoforms by UPLC-MS in the fermentation broth from Bacillus subtilis CNPMS22. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410:6827–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1281-6.
Ding T, Su B, Chen X, Xie S, Gu S, Wang Q, et al. An Endophytic bacterial strain isolated from Eucommia ulmoides inhibits southern corn leaf blight. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00903.
Ding H, Mo W, Yu S, Cheng H, Peng L, Liu Z. Whole genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis strain GUMT319: a potential biocontrol agent against tobacco black shank disease. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:658113. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.658113.
Erlacher A, Cardinale M, Grosch R, Grube M, Berg G. The impact of the pathogen Rhizoctonia solani and its beneficial counterpart Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on the indigenous lettuce microbiome. Front Microbi. 2014;5:175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00175.
Fan B, Wang C, Song X, Ding X, Wu L, Wu H, Gao X, et al. Bacillus velezensis FZB42 in 2018: the gram-positive model strain for plant growth promotion and biocontrol. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02491.
Gao ZF, Zhao J. Effect of lipopeptide by Bacillus velezensis ZSY-1 on tomato postharvest softening and early blight. Xibei Nongye Xuebao. 2022;1:89–98. https://doi.org/10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2022.01.011.(inChinese).
Gao S, Wu H, Wang W, Yang Y, Xie S, Xie Y, Gao X. Efficient colonization and harpins mediated enhancement in growth and biocontrol of wilt disease in tomato by Bacillus subtilis. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2013;57:526–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12144.
Genin S, Denny TP. Pathogenomics of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2012;50:67–89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-173000.
Ghoreishi FS, Roghanian R, Emtiazi G. Simultaneous production of antibacterial protein and lipopeptides in Bacillus tequilensis, detected by MALDI-TOF and GC mass analyses. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2023;15:749–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-021-09883-4.
Ghoul M, Mitri S. The ecology and evolution of microbial competition. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24(10):833–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2016.06.011.
Hao T, Chen S. Colonization of wheat, maize and cucumber by Paenibacillus polymyxa WLY78. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1):e0169980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169980.
Huan YL, Han X, Jun Z, Yu JD, Shan SX, et al. An effective strategy for identification of highly unstable Bacillaenes. J Nat Prod. 2019;82(12):3340–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b00609.
Inoue T, Iiyama K, Asakuma M, Imamura M, Yonehara S, Kyaw YK, et al. Screening and risk assessment of biological control agents against bacterial wilt of ginger. Biol Control. 2022;175:105059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105059.
Jin Y, Zhu H, Luo S, Yang W, Zhang L, Li S, Jin Q, et al. Role of maize root exudates in promotion of colonization of Bacillus velezensis strain S3-1 in Rhizosphere soil and root tissue. Curr Microbiol. 2019;76:855–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-019-01699-4.
Kurabachew H, Wydra K. Characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their potential as bioprotectant against tomato bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Biol Control. 2013;67:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.07.004.
Lei JJ, Kang YF, Miao F, Ma JH. Construction of Bacillus subtilis strain B2-GFP and its colonization in soil. Fujian Nongxueyuan Xuebao. 2022;5:577–82. https://doi.org/10.13323/j.cnki.j.fafu(nat.sci.).2022.05.001. (in Chinese).
Li H, Han X, Dong Y, Xu SS, Chen C, Feng YG, et al. Bacillaenes: decomposition trigger point and biofilm enhancement in Bacillus. ACS Omega. 2021;6(2):1093–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c03389.
Liang C, Junying H, Suya Q, Bian K. A comprehensive understanding of the biocontrol potential of Bacillus velezensis LM2303 against Fusarium head blight. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(6):e0198560. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198560.
Liao JH, Chen PY, Yang YL, Kan SC, Hsieh FC, Liu YC. Clarification of the antagonistic effect of the lipopeptides produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BPD1 against Pyricularia oryzae via in situ MALDI-TOF IMS analysis. Molecules. 2016;21(12):1670. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21121670.
Liu Y, Shi J, Feng Y, Yang X, Li X, Shen Q. Tobacco bacterial wilt can be biologically controlled by the application of antagonistic strains in combination with organic fertilizer. Biol Fertil Soils. 2013;49:447–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-012-0740-z.
Liu YZ, Liang XJ, Qiao JQ, Zhang RS, Chen ZY. Bacillus subtilis PTS-394 labeled by green fluorescent protein and its colonization. Fujian Nongxueyuan Xuebao. 2014;5:577–82. https://doi.org/10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2014.04.010. (in Chinese).
Mahboubi M, Kazempour N. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Satureja hortensis and Trachyspermum copticum essential oil. Iranian J Microbiol. 2011;3:194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2004.9698718.
Milling A, Babujee L, Allen C. Ralstonia solanacearum extracellular polysaccharide is a specific elicitor of defense responses in wilt-resistant tomato plants. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e15853. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015853.
Mnif I, Ghribi D. Lipopeptides biosurfactants: mean classes and new insights for industrial, biomedical, and environmental applications. Biopolymers. 2015;104:129–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.22630.
Patel PS, Huang S, Fisher S, Pirnik D, Aklonis C, Dean L, Meyers E, et al. Bacillaene. a novel inhibitor of procaryotic protein synthesis produced by bacillus subtilis: production, taxonomy, isolation, physico-chemical characterization and biological activity. J Antibiot. 1995;48:997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9988-y.
Peeters N, Guidot A, Vailleau F, Valls M. Ralstonia solanacearum, a widespread bacterial plant pathogen in the post-genomic era. Mol Plant Pathol. 2013;14:651–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12038.
Ramesh R, Joshi AA, Ghanekar MP. Pseudomonads: major antagonistic endophytic bacteria to suppress bacterial wilt pathogen, Ralstonia solanacearum in the eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;25:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9859-3.
Raza W, Ling N, Yang L, Huang Q, Shen Q. Response of tomato wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum to the volatile organic compounds produced by a biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR-9. Sci Rep. 2016a;6:24856. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24856.
Raza W, Ling N, Liu D, Wei Z, Huang Q, Shen Q. Volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens WR-1 restrict the growth and virulence traits of Ralstonia solanacearum. Microbiol Res. 2016b;192:103–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2016.05.014.
Shi JF, Sun CQ. Isolation, identification, and biocontrol of antagonistic bacterium against Botrytis cinerea after tomato harvest. Braz J Microbiol. 2017;48:706–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.03.002.
Spadaro D, Gullino ML. State of the art and future prospects of the biological control of postharvest fruit diseases. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;91:185–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00380-5.
Sun Z, Yang LM, Han M, Han Z, Yang L, Cheng L, et al. Biological control ginseng grey mold and plant colonization by antagonistic bacteria isolated from Rhizospheric soil of Panax ginseng Meyer. Biol Control. 2019;138:104048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104048.
Tans-Kersten J, Huang HY, Allen C. Ralstonia solanacearum needs motility for invasive virulence on tomato. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:3597–605. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.12.3597-3605.2001.
Tans-Kersten J, Brown D, Allen C. Swimming motility, a virulence trait of Ralstonia solanacearum, is regulated by FlhDC and the plant host environment. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004;17:686–95. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.68.1335.
Umesha S, Avinash P. Multiplex PCR for simultaneous identification of Ralstonia solanacearum and Xanthomonas perforans. 3 Biotech. 2015;5:245–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-014-0223-z.
Villegas-Escobar V, Maria Gonzalez-Jaramillo L, Ramirez M, Natalia Moncada R, Sierra-Zapata L, Orduz S, et al. Lipopeptides from Bacillus sp. EA-CB0959: active metabolites responsible for in vitro and in vivo control of Ralstonia solanacearum. Biol Control. 2018;125:20–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.06.005.
Wang B, Wan CX, Zeng H. Colonization on cotton plants with a GFP labeled strain of Bacillus axarquiensis. Curr Microbiol. 2020;77:3085–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02071-7.
Wu G, Liu Y, Xu Y, Zhang G, Shen Q, Zhang R. Exploring elicitors of the beneficial Rhizobacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 to induce plant systemic resistance and their interactions with plant signaling pathways. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2018;31:560–7. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-11-17-0273-R.
Xie S, Yu H, Wang Q, Cheng Y, Ding T. Two rapid and sensitive methods based on TaqMan qPCR and droplet digital PCR assay for quantitative detection of Bacillus subtilis in rhizosphere. J Appl Microbiol. 2020;128:518–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14481.
Xue QY, Chen Y, Li SM, Chen LF, Ding GC, Guo DW, et al. Evaluation of the strains of Acinetobacter and Enterobacter as potential biocontrol agents against Ralstonia wilt of tomato. Biol Control. 2009;48:252–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.11.004.
Yang L, Ding W, Xu Y, Wu D, Li S, Chen, et al. New insights into the antibacterial activity of hydroxycoumarins against Ralstonia solanacearum. Molecules. 2016;21:468. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21040468.
Yao J, Allen C. The plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum needs aerotaxis for normal Biofilm formation and interactions with its tomato host. Folha Med. 2007;189:6415–24. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00398-07.
Ye X, Li Z, Luo X, Wang W, Li Y, Li R, et al. A predatory myxobacterium controls cucumber Fusarium wilt by regulating the soil microbial community. Microbiome. 2020;8:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00824-x.
Ying YP, Yuan XE, Qiang Li, Wang ZK. Construction of green fluorescent protein gene tagged biocontrol bacteria bacillus subtilis CQBS03 and its colonization on the citrus leaves. Zhongguo Nongye Kexue. 2010;43:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283423f35. (in Chinese).
Yu HP, Luo DQ, Dai YF, Chen X. Screening and control effects of antagonistic bacteria against tobacco black shank disease. Appl Mech Mater. 2015;737:374–80. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.737.374.
Yuan S, Wang L, Wu K, Shi J, Wang M, Yang X, et al. Evaluation of Bacillus-fortified organic fertilizer for controlling tobacco bacterial wilt in greenhouse and field experiments. Appl Soil Ecol. 2014;75:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.11.004.
Zhang LX, Li RX, Wang Q, Mei RH. Optimization of Bacillus subtilis B908 fermentation medium. Chin J Biol Control. 2006. https://doi.org/10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2006.s1.019. (in Chinese).
This study was funded by the General Program of Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province, China (No. 2008085MC93) and the General Program of Guizhou Tobacco Company Zunyi Branch, China (No. 201901).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Figure S1. Colonization analyses of strain D in tobacco stems and leaves. Figure S2. The genomic DNA standard curve equation of R. solanacearum. Figure S3. The effect of the minimum inhibitory concentration of crude extracts and its different diluents on R. solanacearum growth.
: Table S1. Target genes relating to motility of R. solanacearum.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Peng, Y., Xie, S. et al. Biocontrol and molecular characterization of Bacillus velezensis D against tobacco bacterial wilt. Phytopathol Res 5, 50 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42483-023-00204-x