Identification of the blast resistance genes in three elite restorer lines of hybrid rice
Phytopathology Research volume 4, Article number: 15 (2022)
Hybrid rice has the advantage to pyramid multiple resistance (R) genes because a hybrid rice cultivar is developed from the cross of a sterile line with a restorer line that can harbor different R genes. Thus, knowing the R genes in an elite line will help the combination of different R genes into a hybrid rice cultivar. Here, we identified the blast R genes in Shu Hui 548 (SH548), Shu Hui 882 (SH882), and Wu Shan Si Miao (WSSM), three elite restorer lines of hybrid rice that showed resistance to the rice blast fungus in the disease nurseries. At controlled laboratory conditions, the three elite restorer lines exhibited resistance to more than 20 China Rice Blast strains that harbor different avirulence genes, indicating their broad-spectrum resistance to blast disease. Expression analyses detected the transcripts of multiple known blast R genes. Sequencing of the expressed R genes indicated that, besides Pid2, SH548 also contains Pi2 and Ptr, SH882 and WSSM also contain Pikm and Pi9-Type5, respectively. Pi9-Type5 is a novel functional allele of Pi9. Therefore, SH548, SH882, and WSSM can be exploited in combination with the sterile lines containing other R genes, and they can be used as blast resistance donors in disease-resistance breeding programs.
Rice (Oryza sativa) is one of the most important staple food crops and feeds more than half of the world’s population. Rice blast disease caused by Magnaporthe oryzae is the major constraint to rice production worldwide (Baldrich and San 2016). Under favorable environmental conditions, this disease can cause up to 50% yield loss (Khush and Jena 2009). Each year, rice blast destroys harvests that could feed more than 60 million people, at a cost of over $ 70 billion (Kaur 2019). To protect from pathogens, plants have developed a two-layered immune system. The first layer is pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)-triggered immunity (PTI) that occurs upon the recognition of PAMPs by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) (Jones and Dangl 2006; Couto and Zipfel 2016). PTI is effective in protecting plants from being infected by potentially pathogenic microbes. However, adapted pathogens express effectors to aid infection of specific plants, resulting in the suppression of PTI (Toruño et al. 2016; Park et al. 2018). Detection of effectors by nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) proteins leads to activation of the second layer of immunity, known as effector-triggered immunity (ETI) (Dou and Zhou 2012), resulting in the hypersensitive response and inhibition of pathogen infection (Alfano and Collmer 2004).
The utilization of functional rice blast R genes is the most eco-friendly approach to prevent huge losses (Wu et al. 2019). Up to now, more than 100 blast R genes have been identified followed by cloning of over 30 R genes, including Pish, Pi35, Pi37, Pi64, Pit, Pi-b, pi21, Pi63, PiPR1, Pi9, Pi2, Piz-t, Pi50, Pizh, Pigm, Pi-d2, Pi-d3, Pi25, Pi36, Pi5, Pii, Pi56, Pb1, Pik, Pik-p, Pikm, Pike, Pi1, Pik-h/Pi54, Pi54rh, Pi54of, Pia, Pi-CO39, Pi-ta, Ptr, and Pi65 (Yin et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2022). Among them, pi21 is a recessive mutant and the wild-type Pi21 encodes a proline-rich protein with a heavy metal-binding domain (Fukuoka et al. 2009). Ptr encodes an atypical protein with four Armadillo repeats and is required for broad-spectrum blast resistance mediated by Pi-ta and Pi-ta2 (Zhao et al. 2018). Pi-d2 encodes a B-lectin receptor kinase protein conferring race-specific resistance (Chen et al. 2006). Pi65, a novel blast disease resistance gene that confers resistance to the rice blast isolates collected from Northeast China, encodes two transmembrane domains together with 15 LRR domains and one protein kinase catalytic domain (Wang et al. 2022). The other R genes encode NBS-LRR domain proteins. The rice blast R genes are present on 11 chromosomes in the rice genome except chromosome 3. Eighteen percent of these R genes are distributed on chromosome 6, 25% on chromosome 11, and 21% on chromosome 12 (Ashkani et al. 2016). Some R genes, such as Pikm, Pi1, Pi5, Pi-CO39, Pia, Pikp, Pike, and Pik, require a two-gene-paired partner to confer resistance to M. oryzae, one called sensor and the other called helper (Lee et al. 2009; Okuyama et al. 2011; Hua et al. 2012; Cesari et al. 2013). Pathogen infection induces the expression of Pb1, Pi21, Pi63, and Pi5-1, whereas, the remaining genes show constitutive expression (Xiao et al. 2020). Pi2 and Piz-t share great sequence similarities with a difference of only eight amino acids in three leucine-rich repeats, and both of these genes confer broad-spectrum resistance against various M. oryzae isolates (Zhou et al. 2006). Because resistant rice varieties with a single R gene are relatively easy to lose their resistance upon the emergence of new virulent races, the key concern of rice blast resistance breeding is to integrate durable as well as broad-spectrum resistance genes (Wu et al. 2007). Hybrid rice relies on the combination of a male sterile line and a restorer line via cross-pollination, thus has the advantage to pyramid multiple R genes that can be introduced either in the male sterile line or in the restorer line (Zhao et al. 2017). For example, an elite hybrid rice cultivar, called Yi Xiang You 2115 (YXY2115) that is developed from the elite sterile line Yixiang1A (Y1A) and the elite restorer line Yahui2115 (YH2115), exhibited high blast resistance in the past ten years. YH2115 contains Pi2 and Y1A contains a novel Pid2 allele, Pid2_Y1B (Shi et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2017). Therefore, genotyping the R genes in different lines can help the breeding programs to better pyramid different R genes into a hybrid rice cultivar.
Wu Shan Si Miao (WSSM) is an indica inbred rice cultivar developed by the Rice Research Institute of Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences and is released in 2009 (Huang et al. 2011). To date, WSSM has been widely exploited as an elite cultivar and an elite restorer line of hybrid rice (https://www.ricedata.cn/variety/varis/606814.htm). Shu Hui 548 (SH548) and Shu Hui 882 (SH882) are two elite restorer lines recently developed by the Rice Research Institute of Sichuan Agricultural University. All three lines exhibited high resistance to blast disease in our disease nurseries. Their resistance phenotypes were confirmed by inoculating with the China Rice Blast (CRB) strains (Fang et al. 2018). Moreover, the expression-based genotyping strategy (Wang et al. 2017) was exploited to identify the blast R genes in them. Our data indicate that WSSM, SH548, and SH882 contain the broad-spectrum R genes Pi9-Type5, Pi2, and Pikm, respectively. Therefore, they can be used to cross with the male sterile lines containing other blast R genes to pyramid multiple blast R genes in the hybrid rice.
Three elite restorer lines of hybrid rice showed broad-spectrum resistance to M. oryzae
Hybrid rice restorer lines SH548, SH882, and WSSM showed high resistance to M. oryzae in the rice-planted areas of Sichuan, China. To confirm the high blast-resistant phenotype of these three lines, we performed spray-inoculation tests using three-week-old rice seedlings, and Lijiangxin Tuan Heigu (LTH) was used as a susceptible reference. The results showed that all three lines displayed complete resistance to the mixed M. oryzae strains including CRB1, CRB4, CRB9, CRB10, CRB13, CRB14, CRB15, CRB18, and CRB21 at 7 days post-inoculation (dpi). In contrast, LTH developed severe disease symptoms in the form of disease lesions (Fig. 1a). Consistently, the relative fungal biomass was significantly less in all three lines than that in LTH, and only minimal fungal biomass was detected in the three restorer lines (Fig. 1b), indicating that all these three restorer lines have a high resistance to rice blast.
To test whether the three restorer lines confer broad-spectrum blast resistance, we conducted a punch inoculation assay. The three restorer lines together with LTH were inoculated with seven M. oryzae isolates (including TT27, YS-A8, YS102, DZ11, TT3, DZ115, and YS4-1) collected from different locations across Sichuan Province, China and 24 CRB strains, which contain different avirulence (Avr) genes (Fang et al. 2018). All the lines showed high blast resistance to the seven isolates (Fig. 2) and CRB strains except that WSSM showed disease symptom to CRB11; SH882 to CRB11 and CRB19; SH548 to CRB4, CRB8, and CRB11 (Table 1). However, susceptible reference LTH was highly susceptible to all the tested rice blast isolates and exhibited typical disease symptoms (Table 1 and Fig. 2). These results indicate that the three restorer lines have a broad-spectrum resistance against M. oryzae and are valuable germplasms for rice blast resistance breeding programs.
Different blast resistance genes were expressed in SH548, SH882, and WSSM
To genotype the blast resistance genes in the three restorer lines, we examined the expression of cloned blast R genes upon M. oryzae infection by reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR). We detected high expression of Pi2, Pid2, and Ptr in SH548, followed by relatively low expression of Pii, Pb1, Pi64, Pi25, and Pish (Fig. 3a), but not the other blast-resistant genes. In SH882, the expression of Pikm2, Pid2, Pi63, and Pb1 was higher than that of Pikm1, Pii, Pi64, Pish, and Pi25 (Fig. 3b). However, the expressions of Pi63 were significantly lower at 12, 24, and 48 h post-inoculation (hpi) than that at 0 hpi (Fig. 3b). The expression of Pb1 was induced at 24 hpi but relatively low at other time points (Fig. 3b). No expression was detected for the remaining R genes in SH882. In WSSM, Pi9, Ptr, and Pid2 showed higher levels of transcript accumulation than Pii, Pb1, Pish, Pi64, and Pi25 upon blast infection (Fig. 3c), whereas the expression of the other R genes was undetectable. Therefore, the broad-spectrum blast resistance may be attributable to Pi2, Pid2, and Ptr in SH548, Pikm and Pid2 in SH882, Pi9, Ptr, and Pid2 in WSSM, and these blast R genes were subjected to further analysis.
M. oryzae infection altered the expression of Pi2, Pikm, and Pi9 in SH548, SH882, and WSSM
According to previous reports, Pi2, Pikm, and Pi9 are functional and confer broad-spectrum resistance against M. oryzae (Shi et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2017; Zhao et al. 2017). Their high gene expression abundance in SH548, SH882, and WSSM prompted us to analyze the expression pattern of these genes by using reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) upon inoculation of the M. oryzae strain Guy11. Compared with that at 0 dpi, the expression of Pi2 was highly induced at 12 and 48 hpi in SH548 (Fig. 3d). In SH882, Pikm1 and Pikm2 had much higher expression at 12 and 48 hpi than that at 0 hpi (Fig. 3e). In addition, Pi9 showed higher expression abundances at 12, 24, and 48 hpi than that at 0 dpi in WSSM (Fig. 3f). These results indicate that rice blast fungus infection resulted in induced expression of broad-spectrum blast R genes, i.e. Pi2, Pikm, and Pi9 in SH548, SH882, and WSSM, respectively.
Sequence analyses identified functional R genes in SH548, SH882, and WSSM
To check whether the transcript of each candidate blast R gene was from the resistant or susceptible allele, we amplified the coding sequence (CDS) of the candidates for sequence analysis, including Pi2, Pid2, Ptr in SH548; Pikm and Pid2 in SH882; Pi9, Ptr, and Pid2 in WSSM.
The resistant and susceptible alleles of Pid2 are distinguished by a single amino acid substitution at position 441, i.e. I to M (Chen et al. 2006). As shown in Table 2, the CDS of Pid2 has one or four nucleotide changes in SH548, SH882, and WSSM compared with that of Pid2_Digu, resulting in H666R amino acid substitution only, but not at position 441. This substitution is the same as that in the functional allele Pid2_Y1B (Wang et al. 2017). Therefore, Pid2 in all three restorer lines is the functional Pid2_Y1B.
Compared with the susceptible allele, the resistant Ptr contains five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) causing non-synonymous mutations and a 12-bp deletion in the fourth exon (Zhao et al. 2018). To clarify whether Ptr in SH548 and WSSM is the resistant allele, we performed sequencing analysis of its CDS. Fortunately, we detected five SNPs and a 12-bp deletion in Ptr of SH548, but not in Ptr of WSSM (Fig. 4a). Consistently, the amino acid sequence of Ptr_SH548 is the same as that of Ptr in Katy (resistant variety), and Ptr_WSSM has the same amino acid sequence as Ptr in Amane (susceptible variety) (Fig. 4a). Therefore, Ptr contributes to the blast resistance of SH548, but not of WSSM.
Pikm1 and Pikm2 are two closely linked genes required for broad-spectrum resistance of the Pikm locus on chromosome 11 (Ashikawa et al. 2008). To clarify whether the expressed Pikm in SH882 is functional, we performed sequencing analysis on the CDS of both Pikm1 and Pikm2. Fortunately, again, the nucleotide sequences of Pikm1 and Pikm2 were the same as those of the reported resistant Pikm1_TS and Pikm2_TS alleles (Additional file 1: Figures S1, S2), indicating that Pikm contributes to the blast resistance of SH882.
At least eight blast R genes have been identified at the Pi2/Pi9 locus on the short arm of chromosome 6 (Jiang et al. 2012). To date, five of them have been cloned, including Piz-t, Pi2, Pi9, Pigm/Pi50, and Pizh (Qu et al. 2006; Zhou et al. 2006; Jiang et al. 2012; Su et al. 2015; Deng et al. 2017; Xie et al. 2019). All these five cloned R genes encode NBS-LRR proteins and confer broad-spectrum resistance to rice blast. Resistant and susceptible alleles of Pi2 are distinguished by an out-of-frame deletion of 3-bp at the position 1543–1545, resulting in cysteine-arginine loss and their replacement by glycine in susceptible alleles (Sheng et al. 2017). Pi9 is an allele of Pi2 with a difference of 46 amino acid residues (Qu et al. 2006). Moreover, thirteen novel alleles were identified at the Pi9 locus, some of which showed better blast resistance than Pi9 and PigmR (Zhou et al. 2020). To find out the R gene allele at the Pi2/Pi9 locus in SH548 and WSSM, we performed sequencing analysis on the CDS at this locus of both lines. Fortunately, the R gene at the Pi2 locus of SH548 had the same sequence as the resistant allele in the Pi2 isogenic line C101A51 (Additional file 1: Figure S3) (Zhou et al. 2006), whereas the R gene at the Pi9 locus of WSSM had the same sequence as Pi9-Type5 allele (Fig. 4b), a novel Pi9 allele that has a difference of 36 amino acid residues as compared with Pi9 but conferrs broader spectrum blast resistance than Pi9 and Pigm (Zhou et al. 2020).
Taken together, we identified that all the three elite restorer lines of hybrid rice contain the functional Pid2_Y1B. Besides, SH548 contains Pi2 and Ptr, SH882 contains Pikm, and WSSM contains the novel Pi9 allele, Pi9-Type5.
The hybrid rice breeding programs contribute successfully and greatly to rice blast disease control and yield increases during the past decades (Cui et al. 2020). The breeders obtain F1 hybrid seeds by cross-pollination of a male sterile line with a restorer line. Therefore, functional blast R genes from either male sterile line or restorer line can be pyramided in a hybrid cultivar. The restorer line is a key component to improve disease resistance and quality of a hybrid rice cultivar in rice breeding. Knowing functional blast R genes in restorer lines will help their exploitation by crossing to sterile lines containing different R genes. In the paddy field observations of our blast disease nurseries over the past several years, we found that three elite restorer lines, namely SH548, SH882, and WSSM, displayed high blast disease resistance. Here, we reported the identification of the functional blast R genes in these lines so as to help their combination with the sterile lines containing the other R genes.
We first confirmed the broad-spectrum resistance of SH548, SH882, and WSSM via punch inoculation. The rice-blast fungus interactions follow the gene-for-gene paradigm. A cultivar exhibits resistance only when it carries one or more R genes that recognize their cognate Avr genes in the blast population (Fang et al. 2018). Conversely, if the blast population does not contain the cognate Avr genes, a cultivar will exhibit susceptibility even if it carries blast R genes. The CRB strains have distinct responses to the monogenic IRBL lines, because they contain the minimum number of Avr genes and could differentiate combinations of the major blast R genes (Fang et al. 2018). Thus, we performed blast disease assay using 24 CRB strains and seven isolates collected from different locations in the Sichuan Basin, China. Consistent with previous observations, all three restorer lines showed broad-spectrum resistance against the tested M. oryzae isolates (Fig. 2 and Table 1). We then performed RT-PCR analysis and found high expressions of Pi2, Pid2, and Ptr in SH548; Pikm and Pid2 in SH882; Pi9, Ptr, and Pid2 in WSSM upon M. oryzae infection (Fig. 3a–c). Sequencing analyses identified that all three lines contain Pid2_Y1B (Table 2), a novel functional Pid2 allele detected in an elite maintainer line Yixiang 1B (Wang et al. 2017). Besides, SH548 contains Pi2 and Ptr (Fig. 4a and Additional file 1: Figure S3), two broad-spectrum blast resistance genes at Chromosome 6 and 12, respectively, whereas SH882 and WSSM contain Pikm and Pi9-Type 5, respectively (Fig. 4b and Additional file 1: Figures S1, S2).
Following the genetic variability of avirulence effectors and pathogenicity of the rice blast fungus, the blast R genes in rice are co-evolved with high levels of allelic variations. Allele variations are critical events occurred in rice blast resistance gene loci. Sequence variations, such as the presence of SNPs, lead to significant differences in the function or/and resistance spectrum of the blast R genes. Such allelic variations increase the number of blast resistance genes and alter resistance spectrums, and thus are highly valuable for breeding programs aiming to improve blast disease resistance. For example, five orthologs of Pid3 showed differential resistance spectra to all the tested rice blast isolates in a gradually descending order as follows: Pid3-I1, Pid3-W5, Pid3-I3, Pid3-W4, and Pid3-W3 (Xu et al. 2014). Among them, the resistance spectrum of Pid3-W5 is 17% wider than that of the original Pid3-I3 from Digu. Sequence alignment of these Pid3 alleles showed the sequence diversities (Xu et al. 2014), indicating that allelic variations of the R gene could expand the rice blast resistance and be valuable for breeding. To date, at least 10 haplotypes have been reported at the Pid2 locus based on the nucleotide sequences of CDS in 42 cultivated and wild rice, namely H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, H7, H8, H9, and Pid2_Y1B (Li et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2017). The amino acid residue Ile (I) distinguishes the resistant allele from the susceptible one that is substituted to Met (M) at postion 441 (Chen et al. 2006). The amino acid M was found at position 441 in the H1 and H6, suggesting they are susceptible alleles; whereas, amino acid I was found in the remaining 8 haplotypes, suggesting they are functional alleles. In this study, the Pid2 haplotype in SH548 and WSSM is the same as H2, containing a point mutation (A to G) at the nucleotide position 1997 compared with that in Digu (Table 2). Moreover, the Pid2 haplotype in SH882 is the same as H4, containing four base-pair mutations compared with that in Digu (Table 2). Interestingly, the amino acids encoded by H2 and H4 haplotypes are the same as that of Pid2_Y1B, which is encoded by Pid2_Y1B, a novel functional allele of Pid2, cloned from an elite maintainer line Y1B using allelic mining (Wang et al. 2017). Ptr is an atypical resistance gene located on the short arm of chromosome 12 and is required for the broad-spectrum blast resistance mediated by Pita and Pita2, but its function is independent of Pita (Zhao et al. 2018). Katy carrying Ptr was resistant to 348 out of 389 genetically diverse isolates, while the Katy mutant with nonfunctional Ptr was only resistant to 17 isolates (Zhao et al. 2018), indicating its broad-spectrum resistance. Here, SH548 contains Ptr and thus is valuable for blast disease-resistance breeding.
The Pik locus contains one of the most abundant variations in blast resistance gene loci that require two-paired R genes to mediate resistance. At least nine resistance allelic loci have been isolated and functionally characterized with differential resistance to M. oryzae isolates, including Pikm, Pik, Pikp, Pi1, Pikh, Piks, Pi7, Pike, and Pikg (Ashikawa et al. 2008; Yuan et al. 2011; Zhai et al. 2011, 2014; Hua et al. 2012; Chen et al. 2015; Meng et al. 2021). Among them, Pikg is different from Pike by one amino acid substitution at position 229 (D to E) in Pike-1, resulting in a unique reaction pattern that was different from that of other Pik alleles against rice blast (Meng et al. 2021). However, among the allelic loci, the Pikm monogenic line showed the highest resistance frequency to blast isolates (Shi et al. 2015), indicating that Pikm is the most critical allelic locus for the resistant phenotype. Here, SH882 contains Pikm and thus is valuable for blast disease resistance breeding.
At the Pi2/Pi9 locus, five blast resistance genes have been cloned, i.e. Piz-t, Pi2, Pi9, PigmR/Pi50, and Pizh (Qu et al. 2006; Zhou et al. 2006; Jiang et al. 2012; Su et al. 2015; Deng et al. 2017; Xie et al. 2019). Recently, thirteen novel Pi9 alleles were identified from 107 rice varieties by using sequence-based allele mining, named Pi9-Type1 to Pi9-Type13 (Zhou et al. 2020). Resistance evaluations showed that Pi9-Type3/4/5/6/9/10/11 alleles exhibited a broad spectrum of blast resistance. Among them, the resistance ratio of Pi9-Type5/9 was higher than those of Pigm, Pi2, and Pi9 as they exhibited 100% resistance frequency (Zhou et al. 2020). Thus, these alleles are highly valuable in blast disease resistance breeding. In the current study, the restorer line WSSM contains Pi9-Type5 allele at the Pi2/Pi9 locus (Fig. 4b), suggesting the valuability of this line as a resistance donor germplasm.
In the present study, we demonstrated that three restorer lines of hybrid rice have a broad-spectrum resistance against rice blast caused by M. oryzae. Sequence analysis demonstrated that all the restorer lines have Pid2_Y1B. Besides, SH548 contains Pi2 and Ptr, SH882 and WSSM contain Pikm and Pi9-Type5, respectively. However, we can’t exclude that other unknown R genes may contribute to the broad-spectrum blast resistance of SH548, SH882, and WSSM based on the genotyping strategy. As functional characterization of novel R genes is time-consuming and labor-intensive, future research can be performed to clarify whether these lines harbor the other R genes. Because each restorer line contains at least two functional R genes, they are valuable as resistance donors for rice breeding programs aiming to improve blast disease resistance via crossing to elite sterile lines containing other R genes.
Plant materials and growth conditions
Three elite restorer lines of hybrid rice were genotyped for blast resistance genes, including SH548, SH882, and WSSM. Lijiang-xin Tuan Heigu (LTH) was used as a susceptible reference. All the rice lines were grown in a growth chamber under a photoperiod cycle of 12 h light /12 h dark, 26 °C, and 70% relative humidity.
Pathogen inoculation and blast disease assay
All the rice blast isolates used in this study were prepared as previously described (Zhao et al. 2020). Briefly, blast strains were cultured for 7 days on oatmeal tomato agar (OTA) (40 g oatmeal, 150 mL tomato, and 15 g agar in 1 L medium) at 26 °C under a photoperiod cycle of 12 h light /12 h dark, then aerial mycelia were removed and maintained another four days at the same condition for spore generation. For spray-inoculation, 3-week-old rice seedlings were inoculated with mixed spores (3 × 105 spores/mL) from different M. oryzae strains according to the method described previously (Li et al. 2013). Inoculated seedlings were kept in dark for 24 h and then transferred to the growth chamber. The inoculated leaves of each accession were collected at 0, 12, 24, and 48 hpi and were used for R gene expression analysis by RT-PCR and RT-qPCR. Disease symptoms were analyzed at 7 dpi, meanwhile, the fungal biomass assay was calculated as a ratio of the M. oryzae Pot2 level against the rice ubiquitin level by RT-qPCR. For punch inoculation, detached leaves from 6-week-old plants were inoculated with spore suspension (5 × 105 spores /mL) of each CRB isolate. After floating inoculated leaves on 0.1 mmol/L 6-benzyladenine buffer for 6 days, the size of lesions was measured with LTH as a susceptible reference (Park et al. 2012).
RNA extraction and reverse-transcription PCR
Total RNA was prepared as previously described (Zhao et al. 2021). Brief, total RNA was extracted from the leaves collected at 0, 12, 24, and 48 hpi by TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). The concentration of RNA was determined by using Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). cDNA was synthesized by using NovoScript Plus All-in-one 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (Novoprotein, China). RT-PCR was done to examine the expression levels of reported blast R genes upon M. oryzae infection by using Easy-Taq DNA polymerase (TransGen Biotech, China). RT-qPCR was performed to check the expression abundance of the candidate key R genes. OsEF-1α was used as an internal control (Wu et al. 2015). All the RT primers are listed in Additional file 2: Table S1.
Amplification of R genes was done by using cDNA and Phanta Max Super-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Vazyme Biotech). For sequence analysis, gel-purified PCR products were cloned into the p-EASY blunt vector (TransGen Biotech, China). Individual positive colonies for each gene were picked up to prepare plasmid DNA for sequencing using the gene-specific primers (Additional file 2: Table S1). Sequence results were analyzed by using SnapGene 4.3.6.
Availability of data and materials
- Avr :
China Rice Blast
Lijiangxin Tuan Heigu
- M. oryzae :
Nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat
Oatmeal tomato agar
Pathogen-associated molecular patterns
Pattern recognition receptors
Reverse-transcription quantitative PCR
Shu Hui 548
Shu Hui 882
Single nucleotide polymorphisms
Wu Shan Si Miao
Yi Xiang You 2115
Alfano JR, Collmer A. Type III secretion system effector proteins: double agents in bacterial disease and plant defense. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004;42:385–414. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040103.110731.
Ashikawa I, Hayashi N, Yamane H, Kanamori H, Wu J, Matsumoto T, et al. Two adjacent nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat class genes are required to confer Pikm-specific rice blast resistance. Genetics. 2008;180:2267–76. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.095034.
Ashkani S, Rafii M, Shabanimofrad M, Ghasemzadeh A, Ravanfar S, Latif M. Molecular progress on the mapping and cloning of functional genes for blast disease in rice (Oryza sativa L.): current status and future considerations. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36:353–67. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2014.961403.
Baldrich P, San SB. MicroRNAs in rice innate immunity. Rice. 2016;9:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-016-0078-5.
Cesari S, Thilliez G, Ribot C, Chalvon V, Michel C, Jauneau A, et al. The rice resistance protein pair RGA4/RGA5 recognizes the Magnaporthe oryzae effectors AVR-Pia and AVR1-CO39 by direct binding. Plant Cell. 2013;25:1463–81. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.107201.
Chen X, Shang J, Chen D, Lei C, Zou Y, Zhai W, et al. A B-lectin receptor kinase gene conferring rice blast resistance. Plant J. 2006;46:794–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02739.x.
Chen J, Peng P, Tian J, He Y, Zhang L, Liu Z, et al. Pike, a rice blast resistance allele consisting of two adjacent NBS-LRR genes, was identified as a novel allele at the Pik locus. Mol Breed. 2015;35:117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-015-0305-6.
Couto D, Zipfel C. Regulation of pattern recognition receptor signalling in plants. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16:537–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2016.77.
Cui Y, Li R, Li G, Zhang F, Zhu T, Zhang Q, et al. Hybrid breeding of rice via genomic selection. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13170.
Deng Y, Zhai K, Xie Z, Yang D, Zhu X, Liu J, et al. Epigenetic regulation of antagonistic receptors confers rice blast resistance with yield balance. Science. 2017;355:962–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8898.
Dou D, Zhou JM. Phytopathogen effectors subverting host immunity: different foes, similar battleground. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12:484–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2012.09.003.
Fang WW, Liu CC, Zhang HW, Xu H, Zhou S, Fang KX, et al. selection of differential isolates of Magnaporthe oryzae for postulation of blast resistance genes. Phytopathology®. 2018;108:878–84. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-09-17-0333-R.
Fukuoka S, Saka N, Koga H, Ono K, Shimizu T, Ebana K, et al. Loss of function of a proline-containing protein confers durable disease resistance in rice. Science. 2009;325:998–1001. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1175550.
Hua L, Wu J, Chen C, Wu W, He X, Lin F, et al. The isolation of Pi1, an allele at the Pik locus which confers broad spectrum resistance to rice blast. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;125:1047–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1894-7.
Huang D, Zhou S, Li H, Lu D, Lai S, Wang Z, et al. Breeding and utilization of a new cultivar of high quality rice Wu Shan Si Miao. Guangdong Agric Sci. 2011;38:15–6. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2011.09.005 (in Chinese).
Jiang N, Li Z, Wu J, Wang Y, Wu L, Wang S, et al. Molecular mapping of the Pi2/9 allelic gene Pi2-2 conferring broad-spectrum resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae in the rice cultivar Jefferson. Rice. 2012;5:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-8433-5-29.
Jones JDG, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444:323–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05286.
Kaur L. A review: top ten fungal pathogens. Int J Res Anal Rev. 2019; 6.
Khush GS, Jena KK. Current status and future prospects for research on blast resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). In: Wang GL, Valent B, editors. Advances in genetics, genomics and control of rice blast disease. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. p. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9500-9_1.
Lee SK, Song MY, Seo YS, Kim HK, Ko S, Cao PJ, et al. Rice Pi5-mediated resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae requires the presence of two coiled-coil-nucleotide-binding-leucine-rich repeat genes. Genetics. 2009;181:1627–38. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.099226.
Li Y, Lu YG, Shi Y, Wu L, Xu YJ, Huang F, et al. Multiple rice microRNAs are involved in immunity against the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Physiol. 2013;164:1077–92. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.230052.
Li J, Sun Y, Liu H, Wang Y, Jia Y, Xu M. Natural variation of rice blast resistance gene Pi-d2. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14:1235–49. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.February.13.2.
Meng F, He Y, Chen J, Long X, Wang H, Zhu M, et al. Analysis of natural variation of the rice blast resistance gene Pike and identification of a novel allele Pikg. Mol Genet Genomics. 2021;296:939–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-021-01795-w.
Okuyama Y, Kanzaki H, Abe A, Yoshida K, Tamiru M, Saitoh H, et al. A multifaceted genomics approach allows the isolation of the rice Pia-blast resistance gene consisting of two adjacent NBS-LRR protein genes. Plant J. 2011;66:467–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04502.x.
Park CH, Chen S, Shirsekar G, Zhou B, Khang CH, Songkumarn P, et al. The Magnaporthe oryzae effector avrPiz-t targets the RING E3 ubiquitin ligase APIP6 to suppress pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity in rice. Plant Cell. 2012;24:4748–62. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.105429.
Park E, Nedo A, Caplan JL, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Plant-microbe interactions: organelles and the cytoskeleton in action. New Phytol. 2018;217:1012–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14959.
Qu S, Liu G, Zhou B, Bellizzi M, Zeng L, Dai L, et al. The broad-spectrum blast resistance gene Pi9 encodes a nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat protein and is a member of a multigene family in rice. Genetics. 2006;172:1901–14. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.044891.
Sheng Z, Li Q, Li W, Chen W, Wei X, Xie L, et al. Identification of a three-base deletion in the Pi2 locus, and development of functional marker for marker-assisted resistance selection. Euphytica. 2017;213:202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1991-4.
Shi J, Li D, Li Y, Li X, Guo X, Luo Y, et al. Identification of rice blast resistance genes in the elite hybrid rice restorer line Yahui2115. Genome. 2015;58:91–7. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2015-0005.
Su J, Wang W, Han J, Chen S, Wang C, Zeng L, et al. Functional divergence of duplicated genes results in a novel blast resistance gene Pi50 at the Pi2/9 locus. Theor Appl Genet. 2015;128:2213–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2579-9.
Toruño TY, Stergiopoulos I, Coaker G. Plant-pathogen effectors: cellular probes interfering with plant defenses in spatial and temporal manners. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2016;54:419–41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-100204.
Wang L, Hu XH, Lin G, Zhao DM, Shi J, Zhao ZX, et al. Expression-based genotyping of the rice blast resistance genes in the elite maintainer line Yixiang1B. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2017;148:955–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-017-1149-1.
Wang L, Ma Z, Kang H, Gu S, Mukhina Z, Wang C, et al. Cloning and functional analysis of the novel rice blast resistance gene Pi65 in japonica rice. Theor Appl Genet. 2022;135:173–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-021-03957-1.
Wu J, Liu X, Dai L, Wang G. Advances on the identification and characterization of broad-spectrum blast resistance genes in rice. Chin Bull Life Sci. 2007;19:233 (in Chinese).
Wu J, Yang Z, Wang Y, Zheng L, Ye R, Ji Y, et al. Viral-inducible Argonaute18 confers broad-spectrum virus resistance in rice by sequestering a host microRNA. Elife. 2015;4:e05733. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05733.001.
Wu Y, Xiao N, Chen Y, Yu L, Pan C, Li Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of resistance effects of pyramiding lines with different broad-spectrum resistance genes against Magnaporthe oryzae in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice. 2019;12:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-019-0264-3.
Xiao N, Wu Y, Li A. Strategy for use of rice blast resistance genes in rice molecular breeding. Rice Sci. 2020;27:263–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2020.05.003.
Xie Z, Yan B, Shou J, Tang J, Wang X, Zhai K, et al. A nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat receptor pair confers broad-spectrum disease resistance through physical association in rice. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2019;374:20180308. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0308.
Xu X, Lv Q, Shang J, Pang Z, Zhou Z, Wang J, et al. Excavation of Pid3 orthologs with differential resistance spectra to Magnaporthe oryzae in rice resource. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e93275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093275.
Yin J, Zou L, Zhu X, Cao Y, He M, Chen X. Fighting the enemy: how rice survives the blast pathogen’s attack. Crop J. 2021;9:543–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2021.03.009.
Yuan B, Zhai C, Wang W, Zeng X, Xu X, Hu H, et al. The Pik-p resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae in rice is mediated by a pair of closely linked CC-NBS-LRR genes. Theor Appl Genet. 2011;122:1017–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1506-3.
Zhai C, Lin F, Dong Z, He X, Yuan B, Zeng X, et al. The isolation and characterization of Pik, a rice blast resistance gene which emerged after rice domestication. New Phytol. 2011;189:321–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03462.x.
Zhai C, Zhang Y, Yao N, Lin F, Liu Z, Dong Z, et al. Function and interaction of the coupled genes responsible for Pik-h encoded rice blast resistance. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e98067. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098067.
Zhao ZX, Zhao SL, Shi J, Huang F, Li Y, Fan J, et al. Different rice blast resistance genes contributing to the broad-spectrum resistance in elite male sterile and restorer lines for hybrid rice breeding. J Plant Pathol. 2017;99:121–9. https://doi.org/10.4454/jpp.v99i1.3827.
Zhao H, Wang X, Jia Y, Minkenberg B, Wheatley M, Fan J, et al. The rice blast resistance gene Ptr encodes an atypical protein required for broad-spectrum disease resistance. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2039. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04369-4.
Zhao ZX, Feng Q, Cao XL, Zhu Y, Wang H, Chandran V, et al. Osa-miR167d facilitates infection of Magnaporthe oryzae in rice. J Integr Plant Biol. 2020;62:702–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12816.
Zhao ZX, Feng Q, Liu PQ, He XR, Zhao JH, Xu YJ, et al. RPW8.1 enhances the ethylene-signaling pathway to feedback-attenuate its mediated cell death and disease resistance in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2021;229:516–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16857.
Zhou B, Qu S, Liu G, Dolan M, Sakai H, Lu G, et al. The eight amino-acid differences within three leucine-rich repeats between Pi2 and Piz-t resistance proteins determine the resistance specificity to Magnaporthe grisea. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19:1216–28. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-19-1216.
Zhou Y, Lei F, Wang Q, He W, Yuan B, Yuan W. Identification of novel alleles of the rice blast-resistance gene Pi9 through sequence-based allele mining. Rice. 2020;13:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-020-00442-z.
We thank Dr. Yan-Yan Huang (Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China) for providing the blast fungal strains isolated from the Sichuan Basin. We thank Dr. Yan Li and Jing Fan (Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China) for technical support.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U19A2033 to WMW and 32101728 to ZXZ) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M683346 to ZXZ).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
An alignment of the Pikm1 sequence. Sequences were aligned by the CLUSTALW and displayed by using ESPript 3.0. Figure S2. An alignment of the Pikm2 sequence. Sequences were aligned by the CLUSTALW and displayed by using ESPript 3.0. Figure S3. An alignment of the Pi2 sequence. Sequences were aligned by the CLUSTALW and displayed by using ESPript 3.0.
Primers used in this research.
About this article
Cite this article
Hassan, B., Peng, YT., Li, S. et al. Identification of the blast resistance genes in three elite restorer lines of hybrid rice. Phytopathol Res 4, 15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42483-022-00120-6