Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

A core effector UV_1261 promotes Ustilaginoidea virens infection via spatiotemporally suppressing plant defense

Contributed equally
Phytopathology Research20191:11

  • Received: 5 November 2018
  • Accepted: 15 February 2019
  • Published:


False smut is a destructive grain disease of rice worldwide, characterized by false smut balls formed in rice flowers. Here we identified a small secreted protein UV_1261 contributing to virulence of Ustilaginoidea virens, the causal agent of this disease. The sequence of UV_1261 was highly conserved among isolates of U. virens and absent in other fungi. UV_1261 encodes a protein targeted to plant chloroplasts. Its expression exhibited a bimodal pattern during pathogenesis. Ectopic expression of UV_1261 in Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis led to suppression of flg22-induced ROS burst, callose deposition, and expression of defense-related genes, as well as enhanced susceptibility to powdery mildew in Arabidopsis. Down-regulation of UV_1261 via exogenous siRNA treatment resulted in reduced number of false smut balls. Consistently, stably knocking-down UV_1261 caused less number of false smut balls associated with higher expression of defense-related genes in rice flower. Taken together, our data demonstrate that UV_1261 is a core effector of U. virens essential for virulence and suppressing defense in rice flower, and thus may serve as a potential molecular target for controlling rice false smut disease.


  • Defense
  • Effector
  • Pathogenicity
  • Rice false smut
  • siRNA
  • Ustilaginoidea virens


Flower is a nutrient-rich sink organ, attracting habitation of a large number of microorganisms. Flower-infecting fungi have caused diseases in many economically important crops. For example, Claviceps purpurea causes ergot disease in rye and Gibberella zeae causes Fusarium head blight in wheat (Ngugi and Scherm 2006). In recent years, rice false smut (RFS) disease, caused by the flower-infecting pathogen Ustilaginoidea virens, has emerged as a serious grain disease worldwide (Fan et al. 2016). Occurrence of RFS disease not only leads to yield loss, but also contaminates grains and straws with mycotoxins that are poisonous to both human and animals (Koiso et al. 1994; Nakamura et al. 1994). However, our understanding on the pathogenesis of this disease is very limited.

In recent years, several groups independently reported the infection process of U. virens in rice flower and a few genes have been identified to be involved in the process (Ashizawa et al. 2012; Tang et al. 2013; Hu et al. 2014; Fan et al. 2015; Song et al. 2016). Generally, the infection process can be divided into two stages. In stage I, conidia of U. virens germinate on the surface of rice spikelet, and generate hyphae or mycelia that grow epiphytically (Ashizawa et al. 2012; Fan et al. 2012). In stage II, mycelia extend into the inner space of spikelet via the gap between the lemma and the palea (Ashizawa et al. 2012), firstly attack stamen filament (Tang et al. 2013), then infect lodicule, stigma and style (Song et al. 2016; Yong et al. 2016), and ultimately embrace all the floral organs to form a ball-shape colony called false smut ball (Tang et al. 2013; Fan et al. 2015). Stage I lasts for 3–5 days, while stage II 7–10 days (Tang et al. 2013; Fan et al. 2015). In addition, a few genes have been found to be associated with infection of U. virens in rice. For example, UvPRO1 encodes a C6 transcription factor, and disruption of the gene resulted in reduced growth rate, inability to sporulate, increased sensitivity to abiotic stresses, and abolishment of virulence (Lv et al. 2016). UvSUN2 encodes a SUN domain-containing protein, and mutation in UvSUN2 led to altered cell wall construction, abnormal fungal growth and stress responses, as well as inability to infect rice (Yu et al. 2015). On the contrary, knock-out or knock-down of Uvt3277, a gene encoding a putative low-affinity iron transporter, enhanced U. virens virulence (Zheng et al. 2017). Moreover, decoding the U. virens genome opens the door for investigation of effectors involved in U. virens pathogenesis (Zhang et al. 2014).

Effectors of a pathogenic microbe have versatile roles in manipulating host immunity to promote infection of the pathogen. They act either in interfering with phytohormone and secretory pathways, suppressing the pattern recognition receptor-mediated surveillance system, targeting plasma membrane components and chloroplasts, or generating a microenvironment favorable to infection (Deslandes and Rivas 2012; Dou and Zhou 2012; Kazan and Lyons 2014; Presti et al. 2015). For example, Phytophthora sojae effector PsAvr3c can reprogram soybean pre-mRNA splicing system to defeat host immunity and promote infection (Huang et al. 2017). Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato injects effectors HopM1 and AvrE1 into Arabidopsis leaves to establish an aqueous space for successful infection (Xin et al. 2016). P. sojae secretes a paralogous decoy PsXLP1 to bind host GmGIP1, thus releasing the apoplastic effector PsXEG1 to promote infection (Ma et al. 2017). U. virens genome encodes at least 193 putative effector proteins (Zhang et al. 2014). Thirteen of them can induce cell death and 18 can suppress plant hypersensitive responses in Nicotiana benthamiana or rice protoplast (Zhang et al. 2014; Fang et al. 2016). However, up to date, none of them has been in-depth investigated during U. virens infection.

In an earlier de novo transcriptome analysis (Fan et al. 2015), we detected a full-length candidate effector gene Uv2169 whose transcription was significantly up-regulated upon U. virens infection. Uv2169 was coincidently reported as UV_1261 that can suppress Burkholderia glumae-induced cell death in N. benthamiana (Zhang et al. 2014). Thereafter, we renamed Uv2169 as UV_1261. Here, we examined its expression pattern during infection and tested the effects of knock-down or overexpression of UV_1261. The results demonstrated that UV_1261 specifically suppressed plant defense responses in rice spikelets to facilitate colonization of U. virens.


The expression pattern of UV_1261 over U. virens infection of rice panicles

To understand how UV_1261 facilitates U. virens infection, we examined its expression pattern during U. virens infection by a time-course analysis. To this end, we exploited a compatible U. virens-rice interaction established in our previous studies with the isolate PJ52 and the rice accession Pujiang 6 (Fan et al. 2015; Huang et al. 2016). Sequence analysis showed that UV_1261 in PJ52 was identical to that in the published UV-8b genome (Additional file 1: Figure S1) (Zhang et al. 2014). Compared to its expression in PSB medium, UV_1261 was up-regulated at 1–3 days post inoculation (dpi), and then slightly decreased from 5 to 9 dpi. It was up-regulated again at 11 dpi, and reached to the highest expression at 13 dpi, forming a bimodal pattern (Fig. 1). This bimodal pattern is coincident with the two infection stages of U. virens (Fan et al. 2016), during which no obvious symptoms were detected from 1 to 7 dpi; whereas white fungal mass were seen in inner space of a spikelet at 9 dpi and the fungal mass increased to protrude out of the spikelet at 15 dpi (Fan et al. 2015). Therefore, the expression pattern of UV_1261 suggested its role in both infection stages.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Expression patterns of UV_1261 and rice defense-related genes. Total RNAs were prepared from samples collected from 7-day-old PSB-cultured PJ52, and PJ52- or mock-inoculated rice spikelets at indicated time points. RT-qPCR was performed for expression profiling of UV_1261, OsNAC4, OsPR1#012, OsPR10b and OsBETV1. UvTub2α or OsUbi was used as the reference gene for U. virens or rice gene quantification, respectively. Fold change was calculated by the comparative CT method 2–ΔΔCT using PSB-cultured PJ52 as the control for UV_1261, and using mock-inoculated sample at each time point as the control for rice defense-related genes. Error bars indicate standard deviations (n = 3)

To check whether UV_1261 expression was associated with rice defense response, we examined the expression patterns of some defense-related genes, including OsNAC4, OsPR1#012, OsPR10b, and OsBETV1 (Li et al. 2014b; Fan et al. 2015) over the infection of PJ52 by RT-qPCR. Intriguingly, OsNAC4 showed an expression pattern reverse to that of UV_1261 (Fig. 1). Particularly, OsNAC4 was in low expression at 1, 3, 11 and 13 dpi, when UV_1261 was highly expressed; whereas, OsNAC4 was greatly induced from 5 to 9 dpi, when UV_1261 was at lower expression. OsPR1#012 and OsPR10b were induced at early time points, but down-regulated at later time points, especially at 13 dpi when UV_1261 reached the highest expression (Fig. 1). By contrast, OsBETV1 was up-regulated across the infection process, although to a lesser extent at later time points (Fig. 1). These results imply that rice defense response is induced at earlier time points but then suppressed by infection of U. virens.

UV_1261 encodes a small secreted cysteine-rich protein

UV_1261 contains a 393 bp codon, encoding a small cysteine-rich protein with 130 amino acid (aa) residues (Fig. 2a). The first 23 aa residues was a predicted signal peptide. First, we verified the function of the predicted signal peptide via an invertase secretion assay following previous studies (Klein et al. 1996; Jacobs et al. 1997; Oh et al. 2009; Cheng et al. 2017). To this end, we cloned the sequence encoding the first 23 aa residues of UV_1261 to the N-terminus of the mature yeast invertase gene SUC2 and transformed into YTK12, a SUC2-deficient yeast strain. Similarly, we made constructs with the sequences encoding the first 25 aa residues of Magnaporthe oryzae Mg87 and the validated signal peptide of P. sojae effector Avr1b as negative and positive control, respectively (Gu et al. 2011; Cheng et al. 2017). Then, the constructs were transformed into YTK12 for invertase secretion assay. As expected, all the three constructs could enable growth of YTK12 on CMD-W medium where yeast can grow without invertase secretion. However, only the constructs expressing SUC2 fused with the signal peptide of UV_1261 and Avr1b could enable YTK12 growth on YPRAA medium where yeast grow requires signal peptide-mediated secretion of the invertase (Fig. 2b). The negative control peptide of Mg87 could not enable YTK12 growth on YPRAA medium. These data indicate that the predicted signal peptide of UV_1261 is functional in mediating secretion.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Signal peptide validation and subcellular localization of UV_1261. a Protein sequence of UV_1261. Bold and underlined letters represent putative signal peptide. Shaded letters indicate cysteine residues. b Validation of UV_1261 signal peptide by yeast invertase secretion assay. Predicted signal peptide sequence of UV_1261 was fused in-frame to yeast mature invertase sequence in pSUC2 vector and expressed in YTK12. Functional signal peptide could enable yeast growth on both CMD-W and YPRAA. N-terminal sequence of Mg87 and signal peptide of Avr1b were used as the negative and positive control, respectively. c The construct UV_1261-eYFP was transformed into Arabidopsis Col-gl. After obtaining T2 transgenic lines, leaves expressing UV_1261-eYFP were checked under a confocal laser scanning microscope. Nuclei were stained by PI and false-colored in red. Chloroplasts showed autofluorescence and was false-colored in blue. White arrows point to chloroplasts, and white triangles point to nuclei. Scale bar, 20 μm. d Fluorescence intensity curves were drawn according to the direction of the yellow arrow in (c). e Western blot with GFP antibody in Arabidopsis leaves expressing UV_1261-eYFP. The band at 40 kDa indicates the UV_1261-eYFP fusion protein

UV_1261 is mainly localized in the cytoplasm and the chloroplast

To determine the subcellular localization of UV_1261 in planta, we cloned the sequence encoding mature UV_1261 (without signal peptide) at the N-terminus of eYFP for transient expression in N. benthamiana and stable expression in transgenic Arabidopsis Col-gl. Transient expression showed that UV_1261-eYFP was localized in the cytoplasm, the nucleus and the chloroplasts of N. benthamiana cells (Additional file 2: Figure S2a-c). In transgenic Arabidopsis plants, UV_1261-eYFP was mainly aggregated as dots, in addition to scattered distribution in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2c). Intriguingly, the fluorescent signal of UV_1261-eYFP was overlapped with the auto-fluorescent signal of the chloroplasts, indicating localization of UV_1261 in the chloroplasts (Fig. 2d). Moreover, UV_1261-eYFP fusion protein was intact as confirmed by Western blot (Fig. 2e). Taken together, these data indicate that UV_1261-eYFP is localized in the cytoplasm and the chloroplasts.

UV_1261 suppresses basal defense responses in N. benthamiana and Arabidopsis

PAMPs like flg22 can trigger basal defense responses, such as rapid burst of ROS, callose deposition and expression of defense-related genes. Thus, we tested whether UV_1261 played a role in suppression of flg22-triggered defense responses. When UV_1261 was transiently expressed in N. benthamiana, flg22-triggered ROS burst was obviously inhibited (Additional file 2: Figure S2d). When UV_1261 was stably expressed in Arabidopsis, flg22-induced ROS accumulation was also inhibited (Fig. 3a). Meanwhile, flg22-induced callose deposition was remarkably reduced in UV_1261-eYFP transgenic line (Fig. 3b), being about one-third of that in the wild-type Col-gl. Next, RT-qPCR was performed to examine the expression of defense-related genes in Arabidopsis (Li et al. 2018), including FLG22-INDUCED RECEPTORLIKE KINASE 1 (FRK1, At2g19190), WRKY29 (At2g23550) and the PATHOGENESIS-RELATED1 (PR1, At2g19990). The expression of FRK1 and WRKY29 was highly induced as early as 3 hours post application (hpa) of flg22 in Col-gl, while PR1 was induced and reached to the highest expression at 12 hpa (Fig. 3c). By contrast, the induction of all the three tested genes were much lower in UV_1261-eYFP transgenic line than in Col-gl (Fig. 3c). Taken together, UV_1261 could suppress basal defense responses in N. benthamiana and Arabidopsis.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

UV_1261 suppresses plant basal defense responses and promotes powdery mildew infection in Arabidopsis. a Flg22-induced ROS burst in Arabidopsis leaves stably expressing UV_1261-eYFP or wild-type Col-gl leaves (CK). b Comparison of flg22-induced callose deposition in leaves of UV_1261-eYFP transgenic plants and Col-gl. c Expression profiling of indicated defense-related genes in UV_1261-eYFP-expressing Arabidopsis and Col-gl treated with flg22. AtACT2 was used as a reference gene. Relative expression was normalized to that in Col-gl at 0 h, and calculated by the comparative CT method 2–ΔΔCT. N. D., not detected. Error bars indicate standard deviations (n = 3). d Disease symptom of Col-gl and UV_1261-eYFP-expressing Arabidopsis inoculated with powdery mildew isolate Golovinomyces cichoracearum SICAU1. White fungal mass was observed on leaf surface (indicated by white arrows). e Quantification of powdery mildew spores on leaves of indicated plants. Significant difference was determined by the Student’s t-test. **, P < 0.01. f Trypan blue staining of infected leaves from Col-gl and UV_1261-eYFP-expressing Arabidopsis. Much more mycelia were seen on UV_1261-expressing leaves than on Col-gl leaves

UV_1261 increases infection of tobacco powdery mildew in Arabidopsis

Modulation of basal defense responses by UV_1261 prompted us to test whether it can compromise disease resistance against biotrophic pathogen. To this end, we inoculated the tobacco powdery mildew strain Golovinomyces cichoracearum SICAU1 onto six-week-old plants of UV_1261-eYFP transgenic line and Col-gl. The results showed that UV_1261-eYFP leaves sustained more white fungal mass and spores than Col-gl leaves at 12 dpi (Fig. 3d, e). Trypan blue staining displayed that there were more hyphae in UV_1261-eYFP than in Col-gl leaves (Fig. 3f). These data indicate that UV_1261 promotes the powdery mildew infection in Arabidopsis.

Exogenous double-stranded siRNA of UV_1261 reduces U. virens virulence

Since exogenous application of double-stranded RNAs can trigger gene silencing (Fire et al. 1998), we employed this approach to preliminarily test whether UV_1261 was involved in U. virens virulence. To this end, we synthesized a 21 bp double-stranded siRNA specifically targeting UV_1261 and prepared inocula using the strain P4 cultured on media containing 10 nM/mL of the synthesized siRNA. As expected, in the inocula from the siRNA-containing media, the expression of UV_1261 was reduced to as low as 50% of that in control (Fig. 4a), indicating that the siRNA is functional in silencing of UV_1261. Then the inocula were injected into more than 30 rice panicles at late booting stage in comparison with control inocula. After 28 dpi, the number of false smut balls was counted (Fig. 4b). Typically, the number of false smut balls per inoculated panicle varied from less than 10 to more than 50 (Fig. 4b). This is a common phenomenon to rice false smut disease that makes disease assay difficult. To evaluate the effects of different inocula, we classified the diseased panicles into five types according to the number of RFS balls per panicle, i.e. 1–10, 11–20, 21–40, 41–50 and > 50. The data demonstrated that nearly half (47%) of the diseased panicles showed mild infection with the number less than 10 in siRNA-treated group, but less than one third (31%) in control group (Fig. 4c). On the contrary, the percentage of severely diseased panicles (> 20 balls per panicle) was much lower in siRNA-treated group than in control (Fig. 4c). These data indicate that suppression of UV_1261 in vitro could reduce U. virens virulence.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

In vitro application of double-stranded siRNA of UV_1261 to U. virens P4. a Double-stranded siRNA specifically targeting UV_1261 was synthesized in vitro and added in PSB culturing U. virens isolate P4. Relative expression of UV_1261 was determined by RT-qPCR using UvTub2α as a reference gene. Significant difference was determined by the Student’s t-test. **, P < 0.05. b Representative image of P4-infected rice panicles with variable number of false smut balls. c The number of false smut balls in P4-infected rice panicles. P4 inocula were pre-treated with 10 nM double-stranded siRNA of UV_1261, and adding with DEPC-treated ddH2O was set as control (CK). Arrows indicate false smut balls. Uv, U. virens

Silencing of UV_1261 attenuates U. virens virulence

To further confirm the role of UV_1261 in U. virens virulence, we tried to knockout UV_1261 by using gene replacement strategy, but failed to obtain any knockout mutants probably due to low homologous recombination frequency in U. virens (Zheng et al. 2016). We then tried to silence UV_1261 in U. virens isolate PJ52. Fortunately, we obtained positive transformants with reduction of UV_1261 expression. Subsequently, three independent transformants (T1, T2 and T3) with significantly lower expression of UV_1261 were selected for further analysis (Fig. 5a). All the three transformants formed colonies with diameters similar to that of the wild-type PJ52 after cultured for 2 weeks on PSA, and produced conidia with unaltered morphology (Fig. 5b). To test their virulence, the transformants were inoculated into rice panicles of cultivar Pujiang 6 that is highly susceptible to U. virens (Huang et al. 2016). Then, the number of RFS balls in each diseased panicle was recorded at 4 weeks post inoculation (wpi). The results showed that PJ52 and the three transformants all successfully infected rice panicles, with the rate of diseased panicle reaching 100%. PJ52 formed more than 110 RFS balls in average in the inoculated panicles (Fig. 5c). However, the three transformants formed much less number of RFS balls than PJ52 (Fig. 5c, d). In addition, we observed that the expression of UV_1261 positively correlated with the virulence of U. virens (Fig. 5). Therefore, these data confirmed that UV_1261 is a virulence effector of U. virens.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Phenotype and virulence of UV_1261-silenced U. virens transformants. a Expression level of UV_1261 in wild-type PJ52 and three transformants. Gene silencing was confirmed by RT-qPCR using UvTub2α as a reference gene. PJ52 was set as the control. b Representative images of indicated U. virens colonies cultured in PSA for 2 weeks, and conidia cultured in PSB for 7 days. Upper panel, top view of colonies from wild-type PJ52 and three transformants T1, T2, T3. Scale bar, 1 cm. Middle panel, bottom view of colonies from wild-type PJ52 and three transformants T1, T2, T3. Lower panel, morphology of conidia from wild-type PJ52 and three transformants T1, T2, T3. Scale bar, 10 μm. c Disease assay of wild-type PJ52 and three transformants T1, T2, T3. Each U. virens inocula were artificially injected into 30–50 panicles of Pujiang 6 at late booting stage. Representative images of diseased rice panicles infected with PJ52, T1, T2, or T3 were shown. d Around 4 wpi, the number of rice false smut ball per panicle was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with LSD method in SPSS Version 21. Different letters above the data box indicate significant differences at P < 0.05

Silencing of UV_1261 leads to higher expression of rice defense-related genes in U. virens-inoculated spikelets

To test whether knockdown of UV_1261 influenced the induction of rice defense, we inoculated UV_1261-silenced transformants (T1 and T3) into rice panicles at booting stage with PJ52 as control, and examined the expressions of four rice defense-related genes at 5 and 9 dpi. Our data showed that the expression of OsNAC4 remained unchanged at 5 dpi, but was significantly higher in T1 and T3-inoculated spikelets than in PJ52-inoculated control at 9 dpi (Fig. 6). The expression of OsPR10b at 5 dpi was increased to about 9-fold in T1 or T3-inoculated spikelets compared with that in control, and nearly 4-fold at 9 dpi (Fig. 6). Similar trend was shown for OsPR1#012. The expression of OsBETV1 was increased to 2–4 fold in T1 or T3-inoculated spikelets at both 5 and 9 dpi. Overall, compared to PJ52-inoculated spikelets, T1 and T3-inoculated samples exhibited significantly higher expression of all four tested genes at either 5 and/or 9 dpi, indicating that UV_1261-silenced strains cannot efficiently suppress the expression of rice defense-related genes. Therefore, these data implied that UV_1261 promotes U. virens infection via suppression of host defense.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Expression analysis of rice defense-related genes in response to infection of PJ52 and UV_1261-silenced transformants. Rice spikelet samples inoculated with PJ52, T1, or T3 were collected at 5 and 9 dpi. Expression levels of OsNAC4, OsPR1#012, OsPR10b, and OsBETV1 were determined by RT-qPCR using rice OsUbi as the reference gene. Fold change was calculated by the comparative CT method 2–ΔΔCT using PJ52-inoculated samples as controls at indicated time points. Statistical analysis was performed with LSD method in SPSS Version 21. Different letters above the bars mean significant differences among datasets at each indicated time point (P < 0.05)

UV_1261 has no intra-species diversity

BLAST analysis showed that UV_1261 had no homologs in U. virens genome and no orthologs in any other published fungal genomes, indicating that UV_1261 is a single gene specific in U. virens. Then, evolutionary analysis was performed on 50 U. virens isolates collected from different rice production areas in China (Additional file 3: Table S1). The results showed that these U. virens isolates were classified into five subgroups, and isolates from different locations could be grouped together (Additional file 4: Figure S3a). These isolates were used to amplify the full-length of UV_1261. Sequence analysis revealed that UV_1261 sequences from all the tested isolates were identical (Additional file 4: Figure S3b), suggesting that UV_1261 is extremely conserved among U. virens isolates.


There are 193 putative effectors in U. virens genome (Zhang et al. 2014), none of them was reported to be involved in U. virens pathogenicity. In this study, we demonstrated that UV_1261 is a U. virens-specific effector involved in suppressing plant defense responses and required for full virulence of U. virens.

Fungal effectors are featured by low sequence similarity and lack of conserved motif within and across species (Sperschneider et al. 2015), although some exceptions exist, such as the LysM domain-containing effectors Ecp6 from Cladosporium fulvum and Slp1 from M. oryzae (de Jonge et al. 2010; Mentlak et al. 2012). In addition, fungal effectors are also defined to be secreted from the pathogen and their expression should be induced in planta during pathogenesis (Guyon et al. 2014; Sperschneider et al. 2014). In consistent with these criteria for defining an effector, UV_1261 is a U. virens-specific effector. First, no homologous sequence of UV_1261 was found in U. virens or other fungal genomes. Second, Interpro search revealed no conserved domain in UV_1261 protein. Third, UV_1261 possessed a functional signal peptide at its N-terminus (Fig. 2b), and expression of UV_1261 was significantly induced in U. virens upon infection of rice (Fig. 1).

Knock-out or knock-down a single effector usually does not affect virulence, due to functional redundancy of the effector pool in a pathogen genome (Birch et al. 2008). For instance, silencing of PSTha5a23 in Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici did not change its virulence in wheat (Cheng et al. 2017). Knock-out AvrPi9 or other 77 putative effector genes in M. oryzae also did not affect its virulence in rice (Saitoh et al. 2012; Wu et al. 2015). However, deletion of core effectors may compromise the virulence of pathogens. For example, disruption of the core effector pep1 in Ustilago maydis caused inability of the pathogen to infect maize leaf, although the ∆pep1 mutants had normal saprophytic growth (Doehlemann et al. 2009). In this study, silencing of UV_1261 in vitro and in vivo consistently showed reduction of U. virens virulence, indicating that UV_1261 is a core effector (Fig. 4 and Fig. 5).

In addition to photosynthesis and primary metabolism, chloroplast is involved in production of pro-defense molecules, such as SA, JA, ABA, ROS and calcium (Serrano et al. 2016). Pathogens have evolved effectors to interfere with chloroplast function, so as to fight against host immunity. For instance, P. syringae pv. tomato secretes a effector protein HopN1 to interact with PsbQ in thylakoids, resulting in reduction of chloroplastic ROS (Rodriguez-Herva et al. 2012). Pst effectors HopK1 and AvrRps4 also target to host chloroplasts to suppress ROS production, although their targeted proteins are unknown (Li et al. 2014a). Effector proteins Cmu1 from U. maydis (Djamei et al. 2011), PsIsc1 from P. sojae and VdIsc1 from Verticillium dahliae (Liu et al. 2014) modulate SA biosynthesis in plastid and suppress plant immune responses. In the present work, UV_1261 was targeted to chloroplasts (Fig. 2c-e), suggesting its role in interfering with plant immunity, which was further supported by that UV_1261 could suppress basal defenses in N. benthamiana, Arabidopsis and rice (Fig. 3, Fig. 6 and Additional file 2: Figure S2d).

Pathogen effectors are subjected to rapid evolution, so as to evade the recognition by host resistance proteins. For example, insertion of transposable element and somatic exchange in wheat stem rust effector protein AvrSr35 and AvrSr50, respectively, drove the pathogen escaping recognition by R proteins Sr35 and Sr50 (Chen et al. 2017; Salcedo et al. 2017). Mg-SINE insertion in M. oryzae AvrPi9 converted an avirulent isolate to a virulent isolate (Wu et al. 2015). However, in our work, no polymorphism was detected in UV_1261 from around 50 U. virens isolates collected across multiple rice production areas in China (Additional file 4: Figure S3), implying that UV_1261 is of extremely low intraspecific variation.


Overall, UV_1261 is a novel core effector protein that plays an important role in U. virens virulence by suppressing plant defense responses. As UV_1261 is unique and highly conserved in U. virens, it could be a potential molecular target for developing efficient strategies to control RFS disease.


Plant materials and pathogen isolates

Plants of rice cultivar Pujiang 6 were grown in an experimental field under natural conditions. N. benthamiana and Arabidopsis accession Col-gl were planted in a growth room at 10 h light/14 h darkness, 23 °C and 70% relative humidity until subsequent experiments. U. virens isolates were obtained via amerosporous purification from RFS balls. U. virens isolate PJ52 was used for gene expression analysis and U. virens transformation experiments. The GFP-tagged U. virens strain P4 was used for siRNA treating experiment. The powdery mildew Golovinomyces cichoracearum SICAU1 (Zhang et al. 2015) was maintained on leaves of tobacco in a growth room at 16 h light/8 h darkness, 23 °C and 75% relative humidity.

U. virens inoculation

Artificial inoculation of U. virens was performed as described previously (Fan et al. 2015). In brief, U. virens mycelia were cultured in potato-sucrose broth (PSB) at 28 °C and 120 r/min for 5–7 days, and the mixture of mycelia and conidia were blended as inocula, with conidia concentration adjusted to 1 × 106 conidia/mL. At late booting stage of rice (5–7 days before heading), U. virens inocula were injected into rice panicles by a syringe with needle. Mock-inoculation was carried out with PSB. Rice spikelets were collected at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15 dpi for subsequent experiments. The number of false smut balls was recorded at about 4 wpi.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and was reverse transcribed using SuperScriptfirst-strand synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed using SYBR Green mix (TaKaRa) and gene specific primers (Additional file 5: Table S2). The reference gene UvTub2α was used for expression analysis of UV_1261, OsUbi for rice genes, and AtACT2 for Arabidopsis genes. Comparative CT method 2–ΔΔCT (Livak and Schmittgen 2001) was applied for calculating relative expression.

Plasmid construction

For validation of UV_1261 signal peptide, the corresponding DNA fragment was amplified with primer pair SP1261_EcoRIF/SP1261_XhoIR, and inserted into pSUC2T7M13ORI (pSUC2) vector at restriction enzyme sites EcoRI and XhoI. For ectopic expression of UV_1261 in N. benthamiana and Arabidopsis, primer pair Uvm1261_KpnIF/Uv1261_KpnIR was used to amplify the full-length of UV_1261 minus signal peptide sequence, and inserted into pCAMBIA1300-eYFP vector with KpnI. For U. virens transformation, 1261_EcoRIF/1261_SpeIR were used to amplify the antisense strand of UV_1261, and inserted into Pzp-bar-Ex vector (Additional file 6: Figure S4) to silence UV_1261.

Yeast invertase secretion assay

pSUC2-derived plasmids were transformed into yeast strain YTK12 with the lithium acetate method (Gietz et al. 1995). The subsequent procedures of yeast secretion assay was performed as described (Fang et al. 2016).

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation

A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 containing UV_1261-eYFP construct was transiently expressed in N. benthamiana as described (Huang et al. 2014) and stably expressed in Arabidopsis Col-gl with floral dipping method (Clough and Bent 1998). A. tumefaciens strain AGL1 containing UV_1261-related constructs were transformed into conidia of PJ52 according to the published protocol with modifications (Yu et al. 2015). In brief, PJ52 conidia were produced in PSB medium at 28 °C, 120 r/min for 7 days. AGL1 containing indicated constucts was cultured in minimal medium at 28 °C, 200 r/min for 48 h, supplemented with 50 μg/mL kanamycin. Then diluted AGL1 (OD600 = 0.15) was pre-cultured in induction medium, supplemented with 50 μg/mL kanamycin and 50 μM acetosyringone, for about 6 h until OD600 reaching 0.25. One hundred microliter of AGL1 cells were mixed with equal volume of 106 conidia/mL PJ52, and incubated on nitrocellulose membrane (Whatman, pore size = 0.45 μm) in co-cultivation medium at 25–28 °C for 72 h. The membrane was then transferred to the selection medium, i.e. potato-sucrose-agar (PSA) medium with 0.003% Basta (Yobios BioTect) and 500 μg/mL Timentin (Solarbio), and incubated at 25–28 °C until transformants appeared. The colonies were again transferred to selection medium to screen for positive transformants, which were further confirmed by PCR with primer pairs UvmitoF/UvmitoR, BastaF/BastaR, and 1261_EcoRIF/TtrpC_R. UV_1261 expression were examined by RT-qPCR with the primer pair UV_1261_F2 /UV_1261_R2. Primer sequences are included in Additional file 5: Table S2.

Subcellular localization

The construct UV_1261-eYFP or empty vector expressing only eYFP was co-expressed with 2 × RFP-NLS (Huang et al. 2014) in N. benthamiana. Leaves were sampled at 3 days post infiltration for microscopy observation. Fully expanded leaves from T2 generation of transgenic Arabidopsis (5–6 week old) expressing UV_1261-eYFP were sampled and stained in Propidium Iodide (PI) for 10 min before observation. Leaf samples were checked under a confocal laser scanning microscope (Nikon A1). The image data were processed with NIS-Elements viewer and Adobe Photoshop. Western blot was performed with anti-GFP sera (BBI Life Science).

ROS, callose assays and trypan blue staining

Leaves of Col-gl and UV_1261-eYFP-expressing plants were prepared and treated with either ddH2O or 1 μM flg22, and subjected to ROS and callose assays as previously described (Li et al. 2018). Spores of powdery mildew SICAU1 were inoculated onto leaves of Col-gl and transgenic line expressing UV_1261-eYFP. Spore production was determined and pathogen hyphae were stained with trypan blue according to the reported method (Zhao et al. 2015). Images were acquired under a Canon EOS Rebel T2i.

siRNA treatment

Double-stranded siRNA specifically targeting UV_1261 was designed and synthesized by Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. The sequences are listed in Additional file 5: Table S2. SiRNA was dissolved in DEPC-treated ddH2O and added in PSB to a final concentration of 10 nM. U. virens inocula were prepared from 7-day-old PSB-cultured P4, and 10 nM siRNA was added again in inocula before artificial inoculation. The control group was added with DEPC-treated ddH2O.

DNA polymorphism analysis

Primer pair Uv1261_SNPF/Uv1261_SNPR was used for amplifying the full-length DNA of UV_1261. To identify the evolutionary relationships among the examined U. virens isolates, primer pair UvSNP1_F/UvSNP1_R was used for amplifying a SNP-rich region in U. virens genome (Sun et al. 2013), and the obtained sequences were subjected to evolutionary analysis in MEGA5 using the Neighbor-Joining method with default parameters (Tamura et al. 2011). Primers are presented in Additional file 5: Table S2.

Sequence analysis and data processing

BLAST analysis was conducted at NCBI online ( Signal peptide prediction of UV_1261 was performed on SignalP 4.0 Server ( (Petersen et al. 2011). Sequence alignment was carried out with MultAlin ( (Corpet 1988). Conserved domain analysis was performed with Interpro search ( Excel and SigmaPlot Version 10.0 were used for data processing. SPSS Version 21 was applied for statistical analysis.




Enhanced yellow fluorescent protein


Pathogen-associated molecular pattern


Propidium iodide


Potato sucrose agar


Potato sucrose broth


Rice false smut


Reactive oxygen species


Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction



We thank Dr. YF Liu (Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences) for kindly providing the GFP-tagged U. virens isolate P4 and other U. virens isolates purified from RFS balls in Jiangsu Province. We thank Drs. DW Hu (Zhejiang University), CX Luo (Huazhong Agricultural University) and CQ Zang (Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences) for providing U. virens isolates used for polymorphism analysis. We also thank Dr. WX Sun (China Agricultural University) for the courtesy of yeast strain YTK12 and pSUC2-derived plasmids. We thank Dr. JMJ Jeyakumar (Sichuan Agricultural University) for critical reading of this manuscript.


National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31501598 and 31772241) and Key Projects of Sichuan Provincial Education Department.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Authors’ contributions

W-MW and JF designed the research and wrote the manuscipt. JF, ND, LL, G-BL, Y-QW, Y-FZ, X-HH, JL performed the research. JF, ND, LL, J-QZ, YL, FH and W-MW analyzed and interpreted the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Rice Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211 Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, 611130, China
Collaborative Innovation Center for Hybrid Rice in Yangtze River Basin, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211 Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, 611130, China
College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China
Institute of Agricultural Ecology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China
Present Address: Clinical Laboratory of BGI Health, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China


  1. Ashizawa T, Takahashi M, Arai M, Arie T. Rice false smut pathogen, Ustilaginoidea virens, invades through small gap at the apex of a rice spikelet before heading. J Gen Plant Pathol. 2012;78:255–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Birch PRJ, Boevink PC, Gilroy EM, Hein I, Pritchard L, Whisson SC. Oomycete RXLR effectors: delivery, functional redundancy and durable disease resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008;11:373–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen JP, Upadhyaya NM, Ortiz D, Sperschneider J, Li F, Bouton C, et al. Loss of AvrSr50 by somatic exchange in stem rust leads to virulence for Sr50 resistance in wheat. Science. 2017;358:1607–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng YL, Wu K, Yao JN, Li SM, Wang XJ, Huang LL, et al. PSTha5a23, a candidate effector from the obligate biotrophic pathogen Puccinia striiformis f. sp tritici, is involved in plant defense suppression and rust pathogenicity. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:1717–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16:735–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Corpet F. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:10881–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. de Jonge R, Peter van Esse H, Kombrink A, Shinya T, Desaki Y, Bours R, et al. Conserved fungal LysM effector Ecp6 prevents chitin-triggered immunity in plants. Science. 2010;329:953–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Deslandes L, Rivas S. Catch me if you can: bacterial effectors and plant targets. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17:644–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Djamei A, Schipper K, Rabe F, Ghosh A, Vincon V, Kahnt J, et al. Metabolic priming by a secreted fungal effector. Nature. 2011;478:395–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Doehlemann G, van der Linde K, Amann D, Schwammbach D, Hof A, Mohanty A, et al. Pep1, a secreted effector protein of Ustilago maydis, is required for successful invasion of plant cells. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000290.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dou DL, Zhou JM. Phytopathogen effectors subverting host immunity: different foes, similar battleground. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12:484–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan J, Chen C, Yu Q, Khalaf A, Achor DS, Brlansky RH, et al. Comparative transcriptional and anatomical analyses of tolerant rough lemon and susceptible sweet orange in response to ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ infection. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012;25:1396–407.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan J, Guo XY, Li L, Huang F, Sun WX, Li Y, et al. Infection of Ustilaginoidea virens intercepts rice seed formation but activates grain-filling-related genes. J Integr Plant Biol. 2015;57:577–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Fan J, Yang J, Wang YQ, Li GB, Li Y, Huang F, et al. Current understanding on Villosiclava virens, a unique flower-infecting fungus causing rice false smut disease. Mol Plant Pathol. 2016;17:1321–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Fang A, Han Y, Zhang N, Zhang M, Liu L, Li S, et al. Identification and characterization of plant cell death-inducing secreted proteins from Ustilaginoidea virens. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2016;29:405–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1998;391:806.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH, Willems AR, Woods RA. Studies on the transformation of intact yeast cells by the LiAc/SS-DNA/PEG procedure. Yeast. 1995;11:355–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Gu BA, Kale SD, Wang QH, Wang DH, Pan QN, Cao H, et al. Rust secreted protein Ps87 is conserved in diverse fungal pathogens and contains a RXLR-like motif sufficient for translocation into plant cells. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27217.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Guyon K, Balague C, Roby D, Raffaele S. Secretome analysis reveals effector candidates associated with broad host range necrotrophy in the fungal plant pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:336.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu M, Luo L, Wang S, Liu Y, Li J. Infection processes of Ustilaginoidea virens during artificial inoculation of rice panicles. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2014;139:67–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang F, Li Y, Shi J, Fan J, Xu Y-J, Wang W-M. Screening and polymorphism analysis of rice germplasms for resistance to false smut disease in Sichuan Province. Acta Phytopathol Sin. 2016;46:247–57 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  22. Huang J, Gu LF, Zhang Y, Yan TX, Kong GH, Kong L, et al. An oomycete plant pathogen reprograms host pre-mRNA splicing to subvert immunity. Nat Commun. 2017;8:2051.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang YY, Shi Y, Lei Y, Li Y, Fan J, Xu YJ, et al. Functional identification of multiple nucleocytoplasmic trafficking signals in the broad-spectrum resistance protein RPW8.2. Planta. 2014;239:455–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobs KA, Collinsracie LA, Colbert M, Duckett M, Goldenfleet M, Kelleher K, et al. A genetic selection for isolating cdnas encoding secreted proteins. Gene. 1997;198:289–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kazan K, Lyons R. Intervention of phytohormone pathways by pathogen effectors. Plant Cell. 2014;26:2285–309.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Klein RD, Gu Q, Goddard A, Rosenthal A. Selection for genes encoding secreted proteins and receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:7108–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Koiso Y, Li Y, Iwasaki S, Hanaoka K, Kobayashi T, Sonoda R, et al. Ustiloxins, antimitotic cyclic peptides from false smut balls on rice panicles caused by Ustilaginoidea virens. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1994;47:765–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Li GY, Froehlich JE, Elowsky C, Msanne J, Ostosh AC, Zhang C, et al. Distinct Pseudomonas type-III effectors use a cleavable transit peptide to target chloroplasts. Plant J. 2014a;77:310–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Li Y, Lu YG, Shi Y, Wu L, Xu YJ, Huang F, et al. Multiple rice microRNAs are involved in immunity against the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Physiol. 2014b;164:1077–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Li Y, Zhang Y, Wang QX, Wang TT, Cao XL, Zhao ZX, et al. Resistance to powdery mildew8.1 boosts pattern-triggered immunity against multiple pathogens in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16:428–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu T, Song T, Zhang X, Yuan H, Su L, Li W, et al. Unconventionally secreted effectors of two filamentous pathogens target plant salicylate biosynthesis. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4686.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(−delta delta C) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Lv B, Zheng L, Liu H, Tang JT, Hsiang T, Huang JB. Use of random T-DNA mutagenesis in identification of gene UvPRO1, a regulator of conidiation, stress response, and virulence in Ustilaginoidea virens. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:2086.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Ma Z, Zhu L, Song T, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Xia Y, et al. A paralogous decoy protects Phytophthora sojae apoplastic effector PsXEG1 from a host inhibitor. Science. 2017;355:710–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Mentlak TA, Kombrink A, Shinya T, Ryder LS, Otomo I, Saitoh H, et al. Effector-mediated suppression of chitin-triggered immunity by Magnaporthe oryzae is necessary for rice blast disease. Plant Cell. 2012;24:322–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakamura K, Izumiyama N, Ohtsubo K, Koiso Y, Iwasaki S, Sonoda R, et al. “Lupinosis”-like lesions in mice caused by ustiloxin, produced by Ustilaginoieda virens: a morphological study. Nat Toxins. 1994;2:22–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ngugi HK, Scherm H. Biology of flower-infecting fungi. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2006;44:261–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Oh SK, Young C, Lee M, Oliva R, Bozkurt TO, Cano LM, et al. In planta expression screens of Phytophthora infestans RXLR effectors reveal diverse phenotypes, including activation of the Solanum bulbocastanum disease resistance protein Rpi-blb2. Plant Cell. 2009;21:2928–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Petersen TN, Brunak S, Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8:785–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Presti LL, Lanver D, Schweizer G, Tanaka S, Liang L, Tollot M, et al. Fungal effectors and plant susceptibility. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:513–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodriguez-Herva JJ, Gonzalez-Melendi P, Cuartas-Lanza R, Antunez-Lamas M, Rio-Alvarez I, Li Z, et al. A bacterial cysteine protease effector protein interferes with photosynthesis to suppress plant innate immune responses. Cell Microbiol. 2012;14:669–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Saitoh H, Fujisawa S, Mitsuoka C, Ito A, Hirabuchi A, Ikeda K, et al. Large-scale gene disruption in Magnaporthe oryzae identifies MC69, a secreted protein required for infection by monocot and dicot fungal pathogens. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(5):e1002711. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Salcedo A, Rutter W, Wang SC, Akhunova A, Bolus S, Chao SM, et al. Variation in the AvrSr35 gene determines Sr35 resistance against wheat stem rust race Ug99. Science. 2017;358:1604–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Serrano I, Audran C, Rivas S. Chloroplasts at work during plant innate immunity. J Exp Bot. 2016;67:3845–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Song JH, Wei W, Lv B, Lin Y, Yin WX, Peng YL, et al. Rice false smut fungus hijacks the rice nutrients supply by blocking and mimicking the fertilization of rice ovary. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:3840–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Sperschneider J, Dodds PN, Gardiner DM, Manners JM, Singh KB, Taylor JM. Advances and challenges in computational prediction of effectors from plant pathogenic fungi. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004806.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Sperschneider J, Ying H, Dodds PN, Gardiner DM, Upadhyaya NM, Singh KB, et al. Diversifying selection in the wheat stem rust fungus acts predominantly on pathogen-associated gene families and reveals candidate effectors. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:372.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Sun X, Kang S, Zhang Y, Tan X, Yu Y, He H, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of rice pathogen Ustilaginoidea virens in China. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76879.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Tang YX, Jin J, Hu DW, Yong ML, Xu Y, He LP. Elucidation of the infection process of Ustilaginoidea virens (teleomorph: Villosiclava virens) in rice spikelets. Plant Pathol. 2013;62:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu J, Kou YJ, Bao JD, Li Y, Tang MZ, Zhu XL, et al. Comparative genomics identifies the Magnaporthe oryzae avirulence effector AvrPi9 that triggers Pi9-mediated blast resistance in rice. New Phytol. 2015;206:1463–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Xin XF, Nomura K, Aung K, Velásquez AC, Yao J, Boutrot F, et al. Bacteria establish an aqueous living space in plants crucial for virulence. Nature. 2016;539:524–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Yong ML, Fan LL, Li DY, Liu YJ, Cheng FM, Xu Y, et al. Villosiclava virens infects specifically rice and barley stamen filaments due to the unique host cell walls. Microsc Res Tech. 2016;79:838–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Yu M, Yu J, Hu J, Huang L, Wang Y, Yin X, et al. Identification of pathogenicity-related genes in the rice pathogen Ustilaginoidea virens through random insertional mutagenesis. Fungal Genet Biol. 2015;76:10–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang LL, Ma XF, Zhou BB, Zhao JQ, Fan J, Fu H, et al. EDS1-mediated basal defense and SA-signaling contribute to postinvasion resistance against tobacco powdery mildew in Arabidopsis. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2015;91:120–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang Y, Zhang K, Fang A, Han Y, Yang J, Xue M, et al. Specific adaptation of Ustilaginoidea virens in occupying host florets revealed by comparative and functional genomics. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3849.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao ZX, Xu YB, Wang TT, Ma XF, Zhao JQ, Li Y, et al. Proper expression of AS1 is required for RPW8.1-mediated defense against powdery mildew in Arabidopsis. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2015;92:101–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Zheng D, Yi W, Yu H, Xu JR, Wang C. UvHOG1 is important for hyphal growth and stress responses in the rice false smut fungus Ustilaginoidea virens. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24824.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Zheng MT, Ding H, Huang L, Wang YH, Yu MN, Zheng R, et al. Low-affinity iron transport protein Uvt3277 is important for pathogenesis in the rice false smut fungus Ustilaginoidea virens. Curr Genet. 2017;63:131–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2019